- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Queen is gonna be a star
Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:41 am to Split2874
Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:41 am to Split2874
quote:
Does anyone have proof Atl would have made the trade with protections?
No one will directly answer this question. It doesn't fit their narrative.
I don't think they do. There is no benefit for them. But there is no evidence either way..
Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:56 am to brmark70816
It’s in my opinion the only way ATL would’ve made the trade is without protections
This was just a perfect opportunity for the Atlanta GM to play dumb while also trying to make himself look like a genius
This was just a perfect opportunity for the Atlanta GM to play dumb while also trying to make himself look like a genius
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:04 am to Wolfcola
quote:
It’s in my opinion the only way ATL would’ve made the trade is without protections
Exactly. At the end of the day we over paid for the pick. I dont think that's a debate. But on the flip side, the trade with the protections is an under pay. Atlanta doesn't have to do it. Maybe we have to include more picks or players to get it done (along with the protected pick). But nobody ever includes any of that. They just said Atlanta takes that one selection. I don't think that gets it done.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:06 am to brmark70816
And if you ask their fans, they would rather Queen than that pick
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:15 am to Wolfcola
quote:
And if you ask their fans, they would rather Queen than that pick
I dont know about that. That selection gives them a lot of bragging rights, until it's conveyed. Its a lottery ticket and if it hits, it's going to be hard to live down. That's the huge gamble we made. At this point it's not looking great, even with Queen showing out..
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:27 am to Wolfcola
quote:
And if you ask their fans, they would rather Queen than that pick
That pick is one of the most valuable trade assets in the NBA
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:38 am to brmark70816
quote:
Its a lottery ticket and if it hits, it's going to be hard to live down
Did the Queen pick not hit? I don’t know about you but i just watched a rookie center put up a 33 point triple double last night
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:42 am to brmark70816
quote:
Maybe we have to include more picks or players to get it done (along with the protected pick). But nobody ever includes any of that. They just said Atlanta takes that one selection. I don't think that gets it done
Maybe Dumars shoulda offered up an Herb for DD swap with the top 5 protections. They really wanted Herb last year. Wouldn’t have to pay DD an extension and DDs age aligns perfectly with Fears and Queen
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 8:44 am
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:51 am to Wolfcola
Two things can be true:
1) Queen looks really good and there is a chance he ends up one of the better big men in the league
and
2) The trade at the time was one of the worst trades one could possibly conceive and even if Queen is good, will set us back a year or two at least
1) Queen looks really good and there is a chance he ends up one of the better big men in the league
and
2) The trade at the time was one of the worst trades one could possibly conceive and even if Queen is good, will set us back a year or two at least
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:29 am to Wolfcola
Yeah remember all you fools were crying about an imaginary pick next year when Queen is out here dropping triple doubles as a rookie a lot of y’all owe Joe an apology he knew what he was cooking
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:48 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
even if Queen is good, will set us back a year or two at least
Why would the trade set us back? We got a very good player a year earlier than the pick would have been. And it’s rare for rookies to show out like Queen has. That player we would have gotten next year would probably take more time than Queen has to acclimate to the league.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:00 am to SaintTigerPel
quote:
even if Queen is good, will set us back a year or two at least
This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. So getting a young future all star center now will set us back longer than drafting an unknown next year? Lmao
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:29 am to Wolfcola
I Hope we hire Mike Malone now so he can unlock his full potential like he did with Joker
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:43 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:too expensive for Gayle
Hope we hire Mike Malone now so he can unlock his full potential like he did with Joker
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:44 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Two things can be true: 1) Queen looks really good and there is a chance he ends up one of the better big men in the league and 2) The trade at the time was one of the worst trades one could possibly conceive and even if Queen is good, will set us back a year or two at least
Too many retards on here can’t understand this. Expected. The issue with the trade is the lack of protections. At minimum make it top 3 protected
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 10:46 am
Posted on 12/9/25 at 11:42 am to brmark70816
quote:
Its a lottery ticket and if it hits, it's going to be hard to live down. T
If the lottery pick hits you get to pick a Zion
Its like everyone forgets you eventually have to use the pick.
Back to top

1







