- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans, Kings, and Blazers agree to Tyreke Evans/Withey trade
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:08 pm to macatak911
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:08 pm to macatak911
He's probably worth the money suggested when you compare to the kind of deals Iggy, Thiago Splitter etc got. So they will match IMO, hoping for a S&T here.
When is the next lockout scheduled?
When is the next lockout scheduled?
1
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:09 pm to Hazelnut
If Demps put a large trade kicker in,it would make it difficult for him to trade. So
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:10 pm to squidburger
quote:
Although the Pelicans technically are still waiting for Evans to verbally commit to signing the offer sheet, sources close to the situation regard that as "an inevitability" by week's end. Evans then would formally sign the four-year, $44 million offer sheet on July 10, when the league's annual moratorium on signings and trades is lifted. Sacramento would have three days to either match or pass on the offer.
The Pelicans/Evans are purposefully not agreeing so they can guarantee that he doesn't end up a King one way or the other, leaving the door open for a S&T I think.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:10 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
large trade kicker in,it
Yeah I could see them doing that, it was rumored.
PHX tried something similar with the 4th year player option.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:10 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Let's hope Demps does a sign and trade then.
We can do a S&T until he signs the offer sheet.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:11 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
If Demps put a large trade kicker in,it would make it difficult for him to trade. So
But how big of a kicker can he put in? Even if the kings have to wait a whole year before being able to trade him, that's better than losing him for nothing and not using the remaining cap space for anything else.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:11 pm to gatorhater211
This is why I don't like going after RFA. The Hornets got burnt with Mo Pete because of it that one year and we saw how it worked out for PHX.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:12 pm to Hazelnut
quote:
But how big of a kicker can he put in? Even if the kings have to wait a whole year before being able to trade him, that's better than losing him for nothing and not using the remaining cap space for anything else.
Well he automatically gets a one year no trade clause I believe if SAC matches. Like EG has.
Nothing to stop Dell from adding no trade years though. (I think)
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:12 pm to Hazelnut
quote:
I really dont see their logic of not matching at this point.
They want to rebuild around Cousins and McLemore
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:12 pm to Hazelnut
Please do a S&T
Ill miss gravy though...
Ill miss gravy though...
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:13 pm to macatak911
Nevermind. Can't put a no trade clause...
"A "no-trade" clause prevents the team from trading the player without the player's consent. A no-trade clause can be negotiated into a new contract1 if the player has been in the NBA for at least eight seasons, and has played for the team with which he is signing for at least four seasons. They don't have to be the four most recent seasons -- for example, Horace Grant received a no-trade clause from Orlando when he signed with them in 2001. He had played for Orlando for the requisite four seasons, but had played for Seattle and Los Angeles in the interim. Very few players actually have one of these negotiated no-trade provisions (currently only Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki have them).
"
"A "no-trade" clause prevents the team from trading the player without the player's consent. A no-trade clause can be negotiated into a new contract1 if the player has been in the NBA for at least eight seasons, and has played for the team with which he is signing for at least four seasons. They don't have to be the four most recent seasons -- for example, Horace Grant received a no-trade clause from Orlando when he signed with them in 2001. He had played for Orlando for the requisite four seasons, but had played for Seattle and Los Angeles in the interim. Very few players actually have one of these negotiated no-trade provisions (currently only Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki have them).
"
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:14 pm to LosLobos111
quote:you'll get over it
Ill miss gravy though...
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:17 pm to LosLobos111
quote:
Ill miss gravy though...
To end up with a starting 5 that are all either legit all-stars or considered to be that level of talent?
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:17 pm to Hazelnut
quote:
But how big of a kicker can he put in?
I'm pretty sure Josh Smith who had a similar sized contract had a 15% trade kicker that may not have stopped Smith from being traded by itself, but made trading Smith much more complicated and it was brought up multiple times for the 2 years Smith was unsuccessfully on the trade block.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:18 pm to Cap Crunch
quote:
They want to rebuild around Cousins and McLemore
My point is, they can either keep him with whatever trade restrictions he has and wait to trade him when those restrictions are over and get real assets for him, or they can let him go for nothing and waste all that cap space. A lot of this does depend on the type of restrictions Dell put into the offer. He very well may have put enough restrictions in it to where the Kings wouldn't think it's worth matching. But maybe Dell didn't put that many restrictions in because he's afraid of shooting himself in the foot if a great deal comes along (in the future) that involves Evans.
Of course they could do a S&T. And that is what I think will happen. But if Reke signs that offer sheet, then a S&T is out the window and I think the Kings would be stupid not to match. Of course, it is the Kings...
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:19 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
I'm pretty sure Josh Smith who had a similar sized contract had a 15% trade kicker that may not have stopped Smith from being traded by itself, but made trading Smith much more complicated and it was brought up multiple times for the 2 years Smith was unsuccessfully on the trade block.
Great insight from the almighty Dell
ETA: Speaking of Josh Smith, why don't the Kings go after him and forget about Reke
This post was edited on 7/3/13 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:22 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
I'm pretty sure Josh Smith who had a similar sized contract had a 15% trade kicker that may not have stopped Smith from being traded by itself, but made trading Smith much more complicated and it was brought up multiple times for the 2 years Smith was unsuccessfully on the trade block.
This is what makes me think Dell may not have put in such a big restriction in the offer. Because you never know what the future holds, and you want to have the ability to trade any of your players on your roster if the right deal comes up. This doesn't necessarily apply to the superstars though.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:23 pm to Hazelnut
Khaaa khaaaa motherfrickers
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:31 pm to TigerBait1127
I want to get excited, but I just can't help shake the feeling the Kings will match.
Posted on 7/3/13 at 7:32 pm to chrisksaint
quote:I praying for a S&T announcement before the 10th
I want to get excited, but I just can't help shake the feeling the Kings will match.
Page 105 of 139
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News