- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pacers trading 23 and Mojave King rights to Pelicans for their 2026 pick back
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:11 pm to supe12sta12z
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:11 pm to supe12sta12z
I like this move. Well done
0
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:14 pm to Soggymoss
quote:Meh, I would have kept the pick next year and gambled that it would be higher than 23. Next year's draft is supposedly strong and there are only 7 picks lower. Not to mention, the "unknown" usually makes a pick more valuable in a trade scenario, whereas now it is set at 23 (which has little value in a trade).
Pacers trading 23 and Mojave King rights to Pelicans for their 2026 pick back
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:15 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:and the east is wide open. Celtics and bucks should take a step back next season. Pacers should be a top 3 seed next year in the east
An extra pick this year is more valuable for this team than in 26.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:18 pm to NOSHAU
quote:same. Not mad but would have preferred to just keep the pick. Hard to have a strong opinion on a move like this
Meh, I would have kept the pick next year and gambled that it would be higher than 23. Next year's draft is supposedly strong and there are only 7 picks lower. Not to mention, the "unknown" usually makes a pick more valuable in a trade scenario, whereas now it is set at 23 (which has little value in a trade).
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:34 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Load up for a trade move imo
I don't like this at all. Having (2) picks in a loaded draft is a great thing. It would hurt us to now lose it trading up IMO.
Find a way to move up from #7 without losing this pick or stay put and draft (2) players.
I wonder if the chances of us picking Malauch at #7 just increased. Only because we now have shooting options at #23 with guys like Nique Clifford and Walter Clayton.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:46 pm to Dantheman504
Food for thought:
We could possibly trade Herb for like #15 and a future 1st.
#7/ #15/#23/ future pick
Quick rebuild and extra salary space/ TPE while keeping Murray/ CJ/ Trey/ Zion.
Would rather something like that or keep #7/ #23 > trading up.
We could possibly trade Herb for like #15 and a future 1st.
#7/ #15/#23/ future pick
Quick rebuild and extra salary space/ TPE while keeping Murray/ CJ/ Trey/ Zion.
Would rather something like that or keep #7/ #23 > trading up.
This post was edited on 6/17/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:49 pm to Dantheman504
Seems like they want to draft 2 players in the first round. If they wanted to trade up then they would have just used to pick to trade up on draft day. It probably would have been a better bargaining chip than the set 23rd pick.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:51 pm to Soggymoss
If we keep that pick, I wouldn't mind Walter Clayton there.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:55 pm to SEC Doctor
I’m hoping Rasheer Fleming falls there. 6’9 with a 7’5 wingspan and can shoot.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:58 pm to Balsamic_duck
I really like Fleming’s game!
Posted on 6/17/25 at 1:59 pm to Balsamic_duck
I'd be happy if one of Fleming or Coward is there at 23 if we don't take a wing/forward at 7.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:00 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
Dumars is trying to trade up. I’m not a fan of trading up in this draft
He's going to double down and frick up.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:01 pm to AOC4PREZ2028
Multiple shots in this draft would be more picks in the teens, this feels like more empty filler you put in a deal
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:01 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
I'm sure the rest of the East thanks the Pels for improving the Pacers financial position
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:04 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
I'm sure the rest of the East thanks the Pels for improving the Pacers financial position
And for what? A low pick in a top-heavy draft.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:09 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Pels better have had some intel before doing this
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:11 pm to nicholastiger
They're going to have to plan for the future now. They have Turner to overpay this offseason and will need to extend both Mathurin and Nembhard as soon as this offseason.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:15 pm to Fun Bunch
lol did Dumars just get swindled? They announce this trade then the pacers announce Hali has a calf strain
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:30 pm to Balsamic_duck
Anyone watching game 5 knew he had a calf strain.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:34 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
lol did Dumars just get swindled? They announce this trade then the pacers announce Hali has a calf strain
This is such a stupid comment.
Hali's calf strain in June of 2025 will have ZERO impact on the Pacers' 2026 draft positioning. If you want to constantly post negative comments, there's plenty of fertile ground to cover. This was just dumb.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News