Started By
Message

re: Mikal Bridges developing into a true #1 option

Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1192 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:19 pm to
And if your only justification is contract %. Jerami Grant is making more than BI, stars get paid a lot of money. It’s the NBA
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25666 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

It's really an interesting question. Is it better to be the 30th best primary option, or the 10th best secondary option/role player?



I like the question, but Bridges is not the 10th best secondary role player either, b/c he isn't a secondary player period. He's a third.

We can complain about BI being the #1 option all we want, but it doesn't matter who's on this team, some guard will always be the #1 option until Zion learns how to shoot. If Zion can't get to the goal, then he literally cannot get a shot off (he can, he just refuses to). There is nothign a defender can do to prevent BI from getting a shot off. It might not be a great shot, or even a good shot, but he'll always be able to get a shot off.

We can always look at Giannis offensively and how he played with Middleton.

This is their clutch stats from their championship team in '21
PPG
Middleton 4.8
Giannis 3.7
Jrue 1.8

FGA
Middleton 3.7 (33 total)
Giannis 2.4 (22 total)
Jrue 1.7 (15 total)

USG%
Middleton 36.7%
Giannis 29.4%
Jrue 15.6%

Percentage of Points from Mid-Range
Middleton 37.2%
Giannis 6.1%
Jrue 12.5%

Percentage of Points from 3P-Range
Middleton 20.9%
Giannis 0%
Jrue 37.5%

Percentage of Points in the Paint
Middleton 18.6%
Giannis 72.7%
Jrue 37.5%

Percentage of Points from FT
Middleton 23.3%
Giannis 21.2%
Jrue 12.5%

Percentage of FGM assisted on
Middleton 40%
Giannis 53.8%
Jrue 0% (All of Jrue's made shots in the clutch were unassisted. That was 9 games where the clutch stats were compiled, not one FGM was assisted)

Middleton shot 45.5% from the field in the clutch for those playoffs, and 30% from 3.




So you would all agree that Middleton was the #1 option for the Bucks when the won the championship, right?
Think about how this team and it's future with BI/Zion is similar with that team?
Zion can still be the leading scorer and still get the ball late in games, but until he can hit a mid range shot, or a 3, someone who can is going to have to do that in order for us to advance in the playoffs.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1192 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:31 pm to
Great post.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

I just find it amusing the guy who will defend CJ and JV on this team at great lengths is also hugely anti BI. You talk about consistency, in what world have JV and CJ been consistent this season?
1. I made exactly zero statements about BI's consistency here, so I have no clue what you're talking about? You kinda just made up an argument here and attributed it to me incorrectly

2. You can check monthly splits, CJ and Val have been remarkably consistent this season. CJ is now going through his first little slump the last few games, but no player is immune to a 5-10 game down turn unless you'r the elite of the elite, but overall both have been very consistently.

quote:

Neither can defend to save their lives
This is a gross exaggeration, neither are terrible defenders as you claim.
quote:

and are a coin flip if they are going to contribute on offense that night
CJ is a coin flip how how he'll play offensively...what?
quote:

BI is the problem though
2nd time, see my previous post about BI's upcoming 30% max and my statement about it's not about how good you are, it's how good you are in relation to how much money you make. That decision comes very soon, basically this offseason, or you're risking losing BI for nothing if you don't plan to pay him the max.

This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 3:46 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

And if your only justification is contract %. Jerami Grant is making more than BI, stars get paid a lot of money. It’s the NBA

And Jerami Grant is an awful contract playing on teams that do zero winning, so I'm not sure what point Jerami Grant makes other than...my point?
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 3:49 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32541 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

I like the question, but Bridges is not the 10th best secondary role player either, b/c he isn't a secondary player period. He's a third.

By "secondary" I just meant essentially non-primary, ie. plays primarily off-ball. It's really too hard to rank role players because some primary options can also play an off-ball role player role at times as well.

As to the comparison with Giannis/Middleton and Zion/BI. Giannis also averaged 8.2 FGA+FTs more than Middleton that season. Zion is only averaging ~1 more FGA+FTs than BI. Middleton was very important to that team in crunch time, but during the regular flow of the game he definitely took a back seat to Giannis.

ETA: if Zion and BI are going to work together, Giannis and Middleton are a good model to look at. Realistically they worked so well together because of the team defense though, rim protecting center, help defense from Giannis, and perimeter defense from Jrue.
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 4:09 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:30 pm to
Epic is on point here

If BI and more so the coaching staff/front office were willing to defer and let Zion be the clear #1 and high usage guy and BI clearly the #2 option and those deferments being to the high volume of midrange shots to more balance of inside/outside but in the clutch, BI steps up more and can shoot the middies when that's the only option late in games, that would be fine.

But there's no reason to think we'll ever actually do that.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1192 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:32 pm to
You’re right, I actually don’t know why I thought you said something about consistency. My bad. But my general message still stands, we need a facilitator on this offense who can spread the floor and allow BI to move more off ball at times. I think Collin Sexton would work on this team pretty well, Tyus Jones would be nice. Someone on a good contract and can play both ways. I do think CJ is our worst defender and if that 3 ball isn’t falling while he’s also getting abused in the PNR, he’s just a total net negative.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25666 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

By "secondary" I just meant essentially non-primary, ie. plays primarily off-ball. It's really too hard to rank role players because some primary options can also play an off-ball role player role at times as well.




i gotcha. well then Bridges is no where near 10th best secondary option.

And when you talk about those secondary options, it really depends on how they fit into the team.
BI is a better player than Herb, but Herb would make the Suns better than BI would.
Swapping Mikal for BI doesn't make us better. Swapping CJ for Mikal does, even though CJ is a much better offensive player than Mikal, but as the 3rd option Mikal doesn't have to create and can knock down 3's, and his defense is the difference maker.


quote:


As to the comparison with Giannis/Middleton and Zion/BI. Giannis also averaged 8.2 FGA+FTs more than Middleton that season. Zion is only averaging ~1 more FGA+FTs than BI. Middleton was very important to that team in crunch time, but during the regular flow of the game he definitely took a back seat to Giannis.


I get what you're saying, and yes Zion should be averaging more than he is, but the Pels have more scorers than the Bucks did. CJ is a 20ppg guy, and we've got guys like Trey and JV who can score 20+ on any given night.

and if you look at their clutch stats for the regular season:
PPG
Middleton 2.5
Giannis 2.5
Jrue 2.0

FGA
MIddleton 1.8
Giannis 1.7
Jrue 1.6

Usg%
Middleton 31.4%
Giannis 27.0%
Jrue 24.9%

Jrue took a back seat to those two guys in teh regular season, but you can still see when the game got close, it was Middlton and Jrue taking more shots than Giannis.

That phenomenon doesn't happen with Jokic with Murray, b/c Jokic has more to his game than finishing at the rim.
Jokic scored more in the clutch in the regular season even though they took the same amount of FGA, but come playoff time it was all Jokic, and MPJ was no where near what Murray did as the #2.
Jokic was 42% usage in the playoffs in the clutch compared to Murray 20.5%. MPJ wasn't even the top role player in the clutch for just about any stat. It was AG and KCP.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

You’re right, I actually don’t know why I thought you said something about consistency. My bad.
All good
quote:

we need a facilitator on this offense who can spread the floor and allow BI to move more off ball at times.
I only think we'd need or could use that type of PG if BI was gone. If we have BI and Zion, I'm not sure there's enough ball to go around for all 3 to facilitate.
quote:

I think Collin Sexton would work on this team pretty well
Teddy mentioned sexton/Kessler for BI a couple of days ago and funny enough, I had the exact same duo lined up in a post but didn't end up hitting send because ultimately I don't see Ainge going for it. But I think those 2 would be perfect for what we have here
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32541 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

If BI and more so the coaching staff/front office were willing to defer and let Zion be the clear #1 and high usage guy and BI clearly the #2 option and those deferments being to the high volume of midrange shots to more balance of inside/outside but in the clutch, BI steps up more and can shoot the middies when that's the only option late in games, that would be fine.


He would be a very solid fit if this is what was occurring. I'm not sure if it's a coaching issue or a BI issue, but the way that BI is used is an issue
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31612 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 4:45 pm to
Yeah Herb has turned into the player everyone thought Bridges was
Posted by DaTruth225
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2015
307 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Low key move of the off-season was resigning Herb a year before his contract expired.


So D.G. did the right thing this off-season? He got railed by this board for using the only room under the luxury tax we had to re-sign Herb. I wonder what his market would be as an RFA this offseason
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25666 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

I wonder what his market would be as an RFA this offseason


pretty sure 2nd round picks and undrafted players never become RFA's. They simply become unrestriced FA's when their contract is up, and most of them have unguaranteed 3rd years when they sign as a rookie.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15225 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

If he sacrificed 3-4 middies a game for 2 more 3s and 2 more shots at the rim,


Just a few more open looks at the rim. Gonna have to snap his fingers on that one.
Posted by SomethingLikeA
Member since Jul 2013
1113 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:22 pm to
Lebron hasn’t seen a stat line anywhere near this since Mikal Bridges was 13.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

pretty sure 2nd round picks and undrafted players never become RFA's. They simply become unrestriced FA's when their contract is up, and most of them have unguaranteed 3rd years when they sign as a rookie.


This isn’t right- Herb and Austin Reaves were both just restricted free agents after being 2nd round/undrafted players.

RFA applies to veteran free agents, which is technically what any player is when their contract ends within 3 seasons and a qualifying offer is extended
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Just a few more open looks at the rim. Gonna have to snap his fingers on that one.

In 2018, 37.5% of BI's shots were at the rim.

In 2024, 14.6% of BI's shots are at the rim.



So yes, BI actually can "snap his finger" and do it because he's done it before.

Unless you think he's so washed up athletically and can't any more? I do not think that. He has everything he needs to be able to attack the rim much more than he does now, not sure why anyone would think otherwise.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25666 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Unless you think he's so washed up athletically and can't any more? I do not think that. He has everything he needs to be able to attack the rim much more than he does now, not sure why anyone would think otherwise.



You think maybe it's really difficult for him and anyone else to get to the rim when JV and Zion are on the court and their man sits in the paint when they don't have the ball?




Here's some interesting stats:

Zion has teh ball in iso situations 21.6% of the time. ONly 4 other guys have a higher frequency than Zion (Luka, SGA, Harden, Tatum).
Points per possession is 1.02 and FG% is 50%, and FT rate is 21%.
BI on the other hand has a frequency of 12.2% for iso plays, and his points per possession are 1.01 with a FG% of 50.5% and FT rate of 12.6%.


BI is involved in a PnR as the ball handler just 6 times a game and has a points per possession of .94
Zion is the ball handler in a PnR just 3.8 times a game and has a ppp of 0.99.


JV has been the roll man 126 times this year.
ANyone want to guess how many times Zion has set a pick and rolled to the goal this year?




17 times. He's set a pick 17 times total this year, and we have a ppp of 1.06 when he does that.
Trey and Hawkins have each set a pick 14 times this year.
PPP for Trey is 1.64 and for Hawk it's 1.07.


Zion has the 14th most post ups in the league, but he's only converting 0.9 PPP, so not really a great play, and he shoots 47.7% from the field on post ups.


This is where i think a PG would help.
BI is at 1.2 PPP when he is coming off a screen off the ball, and shoots 57% from the field.
Hawkins is at 1.3 PPP comign off screens.
Both of those numbers are really good, and the few guys that have higher PPP aren't getting as many possessions per game as Hawk and BI are.
Evidently Zion doesn't do that enough b/c he didn't even qualify for the stat.
The Zion dribble handoff happens a little more often, and has a PPP of 0.96. BI's dribble handoff PPP is 1.17.


Zion averages 16.6 drives per game. BI is at 13.6.
Zion's FG% on drives is 51.5%, while BI's is 54.7%. BI turns the ball over less and has a higher rate of assists on drives






Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110968 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

You think maybe it's really difficult for him and anyone else to get to the rim when JV and Zion are on the court and their man sits in the paint when they don't have the ball?

Zion missed an entire year then played 29 games the next year, most of his minutes replaced by Trey in the 2nd year, it didn't change BI's shot profile one iota from the year before or the year after(this year) so that shows that it has nothing to do with Zion at all.

Plus other dudes play with Zion and Val and still get to the rim, despite having a much smaller offensive skillset.

Herb shoots 33% of his shots at the rim.

Dyson 24%

Trey 14%

Naji 22%



From rotation level dudes, the only guys who take less shots 0-3 feet out as a % of their shot profile are Trey(barely), CJ, and Hawkins. That simply should not be the case given BI's skillset and size.


This post was edited on 3/1/24 at 9:46 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram