Started By
Message

re: Jaxson Hayes Interview in The Athletic

Posted on 12/19/21 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by LouisianaJoseph
Denver
Member since Apr 2018
1392 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 2:45 pm to
Have you ever read this site? Our fans TD are trash.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17944 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

And all I got out of the vast majority of that interview was the same trust fund bratty kid annoyed because the world didn’t hand him what he feels entitled to, like when he melted down over the rookie all star game spot. He’s now matured just enough to try and dress up and deliver his entitlement and blame shifting with an even keel, as opposed to melting down. But he’s still not getting it. Feels like until he is playing in China he won’t get it. Until every person he could point fingers at is gone and it’s just him.


I don't think that he's going to get it even then. If getting tazed and arrested didn't do it, if his father leaving his coaching job to move in with Jaxson this season didn't do it, if getting benched by Willie Green for an extended period after SVG had to bench him for an extended period hasn't helped him to get it ... then why would being forced to play in China do it?

As I said before the season, Jaxson's potential was to be Giannis, but with a better shot. But I don't think that he's ever going to amount to much, because he doesn't have for the game, he doesn't have the drive to succeed, and because, as you said, he's the bratty kid consumed with entitlement.

Honestly, though, I don't think that Jaxson will end up in China. He's just too athletically gifted. He'll end up as an NBA rotational player in a year or two, but I don't think that he'll ever be a regular starter.

quote:

….Jesus these picks were a disaster.



Eh. As poorly as NAW has played compared to our expectations before the season, his production and value is about what you expect from the #17 pick. It's not fair to judge him against the value of the #4 pick.

Jaxson is a bust. He's an absolute, total bust. He's just as bad as if we'd kept the #4 pick and used it to take Culver, which is what we were going to do if we kept that pick. The two biggest busts of that draft are the guy that we took, and the guy that we almost took---an absolute failure of scouting.

But none of that is Nickeil's fault.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61565 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Have you ever read this site? Our fans TD are trash.


They're trashy hiding behind the anonymity of a keyboard. I seriously doubt anyone here would say shite to a player at the game if they got within earshot.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34464 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

He all but asks for a trade. Good. As far as I'm concerned, Griffin can't trade him fast enough. What a pathetic human being he is, to say nothing of him as a basketball player.


I didn't read it like that at all. He seemed honest. I personally agree with him that minutes will help him grow. A few weeks ago Jaxson got like 15 points in like 10 minutes or so. 3/3 from deep. It was nice to see. He got like 4-5 DNP coaches decision following that. He's right, you can't get in a rhythm like that. I love Billy, and he's a good guy and a great teammate, but I'd rather Jaxson get the minutes.

Hated to hear the part about fans screaming negative stuff at Zion. This whole time, I honestly never gave any thought to that. That's got to suck. Hopefully he doesn't get that in N.O.
This post was edited on 12/19/21 at 9:50 pm
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6266 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:46 pm to
This is true. 3 years ago when AD demanded out and was being a bitch, I absolutely hated the guy. But when I went and sat courtside in a late season game against the Sacramento Kings, I ended up talking to his dad for a few minutes in the courtside club area during halftime and at the conclusion of the game, I shook AD’s hand and thanked him for the 6 years before he walked into the tunnel.

I was able to do that and I absolutely hate AD and I am a piece of shite on this board at times.

I really pray to God that our fans aren’t hollering shite at 21 year old injured Zion.

Btw, we won that game I went to. Christian Wood went absolutely nuts and without that win, I am not sure if we win the lottery to win the Zion pick.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71750 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 7:57 pm to
It's not that bad. He's kinda frustrated that he's not playing regularly but he's not trashing anybody or demanding a trade.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 12/19/21 at 10:38 pm to
First part I largely agree, I don’t think he ends up in China either, but it would probably do wonders for him if he did. Maybe then he could have a Christian Wood type moment and realize the world isn’t gonna fall into his lap and he needs to scratch and crawl if he wants to make it.

quote:

Eh. As poorly as NAW has played compared to our expectations before the season, his production and value is about what you expect from the #17 pick. It's not fair to judge him against the value of the #4 pick.


Absolutely it is.

We gave up what could have been Darius Garland on the premise that Jax + NAW + Didi > Garland or Hunter.

And I’ve seen you mention that piece of gossip about Culver before. If we were going to take Culver than that is simply a further indictment of this regime.

This post was edited on 12/19/21 at 10:54 pm
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
10571 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 1:15 am to
He doesn’t have it mentally. Won’t be shocked if he’s out of the league in 3 years.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9819 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 5:17 am to
quote:

If we were going to take Culver than that is simply a further indictment of this regime


What do you mean by this? How could anyone know that Culver was going to bust?

Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 5:42 am to
Let me guess, you’d trade Brandon Ingram for him too and he was your favorite prospect lol?

A moderately athletic two year slashing guard that can’t shoot, definitely trends for why our FO would like that, but it’s not hard to see why he would struggle at the next level and why someone like Garland or Hunter would be more likely to find success with the skill sets they were bringing to the table.
This post was edited on 12/20/21 at 5:46 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17944 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:03 am to
The draft is, to a great degree, a crapshoot. There's really no way to know how players will turn out.

If there were a re-do of last year's draft, Herb Jones would be taken in the top ten. Everyone missed his potential, but we succeeded in getting a gem in the 2nd round because we missed it less than everyone else. That's a scouting success.

The night of the 2019 draft, what was reported was that we had Culver and Hayes rated almost equally for the #4 pick. David Griffin looked carefully and the teams picking 5-7 and concluded that one of the two would still be available at #8, which is why we made the trade.

If that was the case, then the trade was a "success" in that our front office still got who they wanted at #8 and picked up NAW and Didi for free.

So, for all the people here who bash the trade, I say that the trade made sense and continues to make sense, based on our draft board that night.

The problem wasn't the trade---it was the scouting. Just as our front office deserves credit for figuring out this year that Herb Jones might better than everyone else thought, they deserve blame for failing to realize that Hayes and Culver would be busts. If course, all the mock drafts had Culver in the top 7, and Jaxson wasn't going to last past #11 or #12, even if we didn't pick him, because there were indeed analytics that showed Culver and Hayes as equal value with RJ Barrett for the #3 pick. I think that using analytics is important, but they can't measure love of the game, attitude, or work ethic---that's stuff that only good scouting can tell you. The construction of our draft board prior to the 2019 draft is the biggest failure of the Griffin administration.

There have, obviously, been other significant failures, such as signing Nicole Melli and losing Christian Wood in the process, the Redick dustup, the expectation that Bledsoe could be a good starter for us, and the Adams trade and extension.

[Edit: forgot the hiring of SVG]

[Edit again, because I forgot the Lonzo trade.]

I said before the season that, if we fail to make the playoffs, Griff should be fired. Even without Zion for most of the season, I still think that he should go if we don't make the play-in, because the West is so weak.

But if our acquisitions of Herb Jones and Jonas Valanciunas and the resigning if Josh Hart (when most of this board thought that Naji would be just as good for less money) help us to make it to the play-in, then I have to give the front office credit for those decisions.

It works both ways.
This post was edited on 12/20/21 at 7:32 am
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14449 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:09 am to
Scouting in 2019 I really can't give a whole lot of fault there also, we didn't really have a scouting department in place, and the scout that we did have was a holdover from Demps IIRC.


There wasn't a whole lot of time to get a scouting department in place and fix that aspect of the organization, but that has changed since then.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:10 am to
quote:

If that was the case, then the trade was a "success" in that our front office still got who they wanted at #8 and picked up NAW and Didi for free.


Because you identified shite and were able to move back and still get shite doesn’t make something a success…I mean I guess from an organizational perspective if what you wanted was shite, but from an objective view, all you did was get shite
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:11 am to
quote:

Scouting in 2019 I really can't give a whole lot of fault there also, we didn't really have a scouting department in place, and the scout that we did have was a holdover from Demps IIRC.


So then you don’t get cute and move down in the draft if you don’t actually have a scouting department in place, you stay out and pick BPA and that was Hunter or Garland. What you say here, which I don’t believe, would be even more of an indictment
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14449 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:15 am to
As GOP stated above, analytics showed differently from your idea of BPA.

Also, one could argue without a scoring department you attempt to trade up for what you know is a sure thing, which they tried to do to get Ja, or trade down to take more bites at the apple.

Lastly, I don't get the fascination with Hunter, dude has missed more games than Zion.
This post was edited on 12/20/21 at 6:17 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9819 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:29 am to
Garland was not judged as BPA at that time. Shading it that way is revisionist. The debate at that time was Hunter or Culver. If we went PG (which wasn't a need with us having both Ball and Holiday), it was between White and Garland. The overwhelming favorite on the board was White.

My whole point on this is that White, Culver and even Hunter have all been disappointments. Garland has not. It's not a great debate that we should have taken him or that it's a huge mark against Griffin. It's somewhat luck.

Culver was a stud. It was a bit of a flash in the pan. But a lot, myself included, saw it as an ascension. He was supposed to have a high floor and be an awesome defender at SG. We had Ingram, so SF was locked down. The need was a SG, which is why we threw stupid money at Reddick. I have followed Culvers situation and it is a shame. But it happens. Rehashing Garland over and over accomplish anything and it's a disingenuous take.

Hayes is a bust. It sucks. Lots of blame to go around. But the trade wasn't awful. Griffin played the %s and lost..
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17944 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Scouting in 2019 I really can't give a whole lot of fault there also, we didn't really have a scouting department in place, and the scout that we did have was a holdover from Demps IIRC.


There wasn't a whole lot of time to get a scouting department in place and fix that aspect of the organization, but that has changed since then.


No, David Griffin had time to get scouts in place. That's BS. You can't use that as an excuse.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14449 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 6:42 am to
How much time? He was hired April 12th, draft was 2 months later.

There was no basketball being played, so what scouts would've been able to scout? You could conduct interviews, that's about it. Scouting is a year around job, it's not something you get done in 2 months.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Garland was not judged as BPA at that time. Shading it that way is revisionist.


Yes he was, on many boards

LINK
4, Hunter, 5, Garland

LINK /
4.) Darius Garland, 5.) Hunter

LINK /
4.) Hunter, 5.) Garland

LINK
4.) Garland

LINK /

4.) Garland

LINK /
4.) Hunter, 5.) Garland

Me: after the pick
quote:

quote:


Yep. Griff really fricked this up. I’m shocked we didn’t take Garland. Even if we want to keep Lonzo and Jrue, let Garland be our sixth man guard just like CJ was initially for Portland. Darius could have played alongside Lonzo or Jrue in the backcourt for stretches and it would have worked.



I'd even accept taking Hunter, as you don't know what Ingram will be or whether he can even stay healthy.

Yeah, I feel completely at odds with the rest of the board because I think this was Griffin's first swing and miss and it is a doozy, and it seriously makes me concerned with how he will utilize those incredible assets he received in the Lakers trade.


And you can check the receipts, I was shouting at the rooftops about Garland before the draft and how his offensive skillset perfectly compliments Zion and the modern game, you could even argue with his pull up shooting and ability to be an off-ball chaos shooter, a more natural fit than Morant. If we didnt have out scouts in place, then it made ZERO sense to not just take BPA.

As a side note you'll notice Jaxson Hayes often around 10.

It just blows my mind the defenders still popping up for that move.
This post was edited on 12/20/21 at 7:31 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9819 posts
Posted on 12/20/21 at 7:39 am to
Congrats. You were right. I appreciate you pulling all those sources.

But that presupposes not making the trade with Atlanta. If we magically could go back, wouldn't we just go after Morant? Trade a mega package to Memphis for the 2nd pick?

Another issue with a redraft using hindsight is that we still don't end up with Garland. He would go 3rd to the Knicks. We would be stuck with either Barrett or Hunter. We can't be the only team redoing it with that type of knowledge..
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram