Started By
Message

Hypothetical: Say the Lakers get the 2 pick and not the 1

Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:17 pm
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:17 pm
Do you take Scoot Henderson? How would he fit on this roster?
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8844 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:19 pm to
Well yea.
Posted by DomincDecoco
of no fixed abode
Member since Oct 2018
10880 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:20 pm to
Or you trade it for a bunch more 1sts and go after a young vet
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12307 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:20 pm to
You take the consensus number two every time regardless of your roster. You not guaranteed that good of a pick again.
This post was edited on 11/10/22 at 2:21 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110888 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Do you take Scoot Henderson?
Yes
quote:

How would he fit on this roster?
Beautifully as CJ's replacement 1-2 seasons later.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Well yea.


I mean, I think so too but that puts us in a logjam at guard unless Dyson grows more and we use him as more of a wing.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61514 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:24 pm to
The only reason you don't follow your board and take the BPA is if you think it's an especially weak draft and don't want the guaranteed money tied up in players you don't believe in. But all indications are that's not the case for this draft.
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
3151 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:24 pm to
scoot would be #1 in most other drafts. Reminds me of Ja or prime westbrook
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115958 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Do you take Scoot Henderson?


Uh duh?

Yeah. You take Scoot.

And if he works out you can move CJ down the road for other parts.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:28 pm to
Of course Wembanyama's ceiling is higher. He's a unicorn but I do wonder if Scoot would be a safer option longterm. There's tons of reference of taller 7 footers, guys Victor's height and taller, that just dont last very long in the NBA.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14909 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:30 pm to
From the limited research I've done on this years draft prospects as of now if that Lakers pick landed in the top 4 I wouldn't entertain trading it for any less than a perennial All-Star/All-NBA player.

Obviously those top 4 probably won't remain the same, but as of now...
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110888 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

I mean, I think so too but that puts us in a logjam at guard unless Dyson grows more and we use him as more of a wing.

This could be true but when you're drafting this high you go BPA and figure it out.

Another way to look at it right now Scoot grades out to be much better than Dyson, so why would you not take him if you have Dyson? If you can truly only keep 1, take the better player in Scoot and move Dyson down the road.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Or you trade it for a bunch more 1sts and go after a young vet


Have we learned nothing from the Jaxson Hayes trade?

Only under the most advantageous scenario(think getting someone like Luka in his prime) you never give up the opportunity to pick top 5.

If you get Scoot? You take it and dont think twice. In pretty much every draft besides this one and Zion’s the last half decade, Scoot would be consensus #1 right now
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6251 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:32 pm to
Dyson is already basically 6ft 8 and is more of a 3 and Slashing D Wing if we are being absolutely honest.

Of course you take Scoot if he is the 2nd best prospect at the time of the draft.

You never truly know, someone else may surface during the NCAA season.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110888 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Of course Wembanyama's ceiling is higher. He's a unicorn but I do wonder if Scoot would be a safer option longterm
He'd 100% be safer, but I still think you take Wemby 100 out of 100 times. The reward is just too high to turn down for the risk but I think it's a fair question.

Dudes that size seem to not have success staying healthy.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17484 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:36 pm to
I want a franchise guard. We haven't drafted one since CP3.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:38 pm to
No of course not. if you're the number 1 then you HAVE to take Wemby and get the 7-8 amazing seasons out of him.

But I also wonder if it would be a blessing in disguise if we ended up with the 2 and get 12 or more years out of Scoot.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Dyson is already basically 6ft 8 and is more of a 3 and Slashing D Wing if we are being absolutely honest.


If we are also being honest, if Scoot lands here and is the real deal, Dyson probably has a long term future with us entirely dependent on whether he can learn to shoot at a Lonzo-like level.

Cause Scoot also is not a pure shooter right now(and may only be a Morant-like streaky one) and with BI/Zion as your core(also not great three point shooters), you basically have to put a knock down shooter next to them(also means Herb’s long-term in a Scoot to Pels world probably has a limited shelf life), especially when rim protecting switchable stretch fives are not easy to find.

Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:47 pm to
He's not a pure shooter right now but he's much better than Ja and has a higher ceiling for it than Ja IMO. I think he'd be perfect with Z and BI.


I think Herb's work ethic the next several years will get him to where he's not complete trash at 3
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110888 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Dyson is already basically 6ft 8 and is more of a 3 and Slashing D Wing if we are being absolutely honest.

We know he has the D, but Dyson seems much, much more of a facilitator who is best with the ball in his hands than just a guy who catches and shoots 3s.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram