- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Garrett Temple not retiring, wants to be back
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:23 am to Broski
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:23 am to Broski
Seabron is also way cheaper than temple. Don’t really care to pay 5 mil to a cheerleader. We have enough leadership from other vets. He provides nothing for a more expensive price.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:24 am to Macintosh
quote:
Seabron is also way cheaper than temple.
It's why I said Temple should be on the vet min.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:30 am to Broski
quote:.
GT (again, theoretically) brings something
We are 8 games under .500 the two years he was here. It would be one thing if he was contributing to a winning culture. Whatever you theoretically get from him has already been milked dry
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:32 am to GynoSandberg
Pretty much what I was about to post but more succinctly put.
I don't see any tangible benefit to someone completely washed like Temple.
I don't see any tangible benefit to someone completely washed like Temple.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:32 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
We are 8 games under .500 the two years he was here. It would be one thing if he was contributing to a winning culture. Whatever you theoretically get from him has already been milked dry
And yet, it's still more than Seabron could've possibly contributed.
I'm not saying it has to be GT, but I think the end of the bench role is better suited for a vet than it is some 2-way scrub who has little chance of ever sustaining an NBA career.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:32 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
GT could literally just be front office guy but he doesn’t see the writing on the wall.
I'm sure he does see the writing on the wall, and the writing says front office staff members don't make $5 million a year.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:33 am to Broski
quote:2-way players do not count against the roster, so irrelevant.
And yet, it's still more than Seabron could've possibly contributed.
I'm not saying it has to be GT, but I think the end of the bench role is better suited for a vet than it is some 2-way scrub who has little chance of ever sustaining an NBA career.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:35 am to Fun Bunch
No reason for him to be on team he can be an assistant coach we need better back ups
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:36 am to tigersmanager
quote:
we need better back ups
Like Seabron
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:43 am to Broski
quote:or use that money to upgrade the 6/7/8th option on the team.
Like Seabron
Posted on 4/14/23 at 11:54 am to TigerinATL
quote:
I'm sure he does see the writing on the wall, and the writing says front office staff members don't make $5 million a year.
He's made $60M in his nba career, which is beyond anyone's expectation, and he's been smart with his money on top of that. Of course he'd like another $5M, but it's not like he'll be hurting b/c he'll only make a couple hundred grand as an assistant instead of a $2M as a player.
There's a 99.9% chance we waive him. The only way we wouldn't is if his salary was needed for a trade for some reason.
and while i would like him to remain on the team, i do not want him taking up a roster spot. Give that to a young 2nd round or undrafted player, or hell just leave the roster spot open.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 12:04 pm to Macintosh
GT will obviously be back unless we can use his salary in a much bigger trade
Posted on 4/14/23 at 12:11 pm to GOP_Tiger
If we were in his shoes, get to live home, playing for the hometown team, getting paid handsomely, and is in a role that you like, why would you give it up?
This post was edited on 4/14/23 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 4/14/23 at 12:28 pm to supe12sta12z
It's not that he's giving it up, but I doubt he wants to be traded, and if he were to remain with us at $5M, it's b/c we are going to trade him.
No one is going to pay him $5m to play basketball next year.
No one is going to pay him $5m to play basketball next year.
Posted on 4/14/23 at 12:43 pm to Fun Bunch
That’s like George Hill saying he wants a “Udonis Haslem role” with the Pacers. Can’t play anymore but keep the checks coming!
Posted on 4/14/23 at 2:14 pm to Fun Bunch
All he gives the team is another body at practice. He has not upside nor value. Let him go!
Posted on 4/14/23 at 5:29 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Garrett Temple says he’s given no thought to retiring.
Why would he? A free courtside seat and getting paid $5 mill/yr to watch basketball games.
Where do I sign up for that?
Popular
Back to top


1







