- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlotte would prefer BI
Posted on 6/18/23 at 12:18 pm to shel311
Posted on 6/18/23 at 12:18 pm to shel311
Luxury tax penalty is $1.50 penalty/tax for each $1 spent over cap…spend $10 mill over cap and u pay extra $15 mill…penalty
May increase the higher u go in luxury.
new cba brings…
“The NBA is also implementing a second salary cap apron — $17.5 million over the tax line — and those teams will no longer have access to the taxpayer mid-level in free agency. Those changes will be eased into the salary cap over a period of years.”
May increase the higher u go in luxury.
new cba brings…
“The NBA is also implementing a second salary cap apron — $17.5 million over the tax line — and those teams will no longer have access to the taxpayer mid-level in free agency. Those changes will be eased into the salary cap over a period of years.”
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 12:32 pm
0
Posted on 6/18/23 at 12:48 pm to BradleyBadd
Send the fat guy……
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:13 pm to redfish99
quote:
Send the fat guy……
No
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:34 pm to BradleyBadd
quote:
Charlotte would prefer BI
No problem
2
Mark Williams
Future pick(s)
Not taking back Hayward
...is a great place to start the conversation.
Less than that and they can eat shite.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:36 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
They were 10 games under .500 and beat a clippers team without kawhi/pg 13 to get in and then lost in 6 games to suns. But sure let’s forget all that context as well.
Who’s the one lacking context?? To be fair and accurate, you should examine what the record was when the trade was made to bring in CJ and Larry. To put it all on BI because he, essentially by himself (before CJ, Larry came, Jose emerged, Herb figured out the NBA, Trey became a productive player), couldn’t prevent a historically terrible start is totally lacking in context. What was their record after CJ and Larry came in is what he should be measured by. Totally disingenuous take.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:42 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:we were a .500 team when CJ was traded here for the rest of the season. We were still average at best
What was their record after CJ and Larry came in is what he should be measured by. Totally disingenuous take.
I think what we’re getting at is this team as of now if just incredibly average and had a nice little run in December which has brainwashed all of your minds into thinking this roster is a title contender. When in reality, we’re not there. And we’re gonna be financially tied up for a while if we commit to this team and re-sign bi. Just feels like a bad investment.
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:51 pm to shel311
Crazy that bi will make 47 mil.
I just don't see how cj doesn't get traded after this next year.
I just don't see how cj doesn't get traded after this next year.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 1:57 pm to Chalkywhite84
Bi Base salary for 23-24 is 33.8 mill
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:03 pm to BradleyBadd
quote:he’ll account for 30% of the cap for his next contract. It’s just reeks of a Bradley Beal/wizards issue all over again. Mediocrity with results and holding a “loyal” player too long as his trade value drops
Bi Base salary for 23-24 is 33.8 mill
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:11 pm to Chalkywhite84
quote:Don't entirely disagree but the cap wiklve considerable higher in year 1 of that new contract.
Crazy that bi will make 47 mil.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:12 pm to Macintosh
quote:Beal was extended as the #1 player to build around.
he’ll account for 30% of the cap for his next contract. It’s just reeks of a Bradley Beal/wizards issue all over again. Mediocrity with results and holding a “loyal” player too long as his trade value drops
If we do that with BI, we're cooked. If he's the #2, that's fine.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:21 pm to shel311
quote:
But part of the issue is the money you don't receive from being a non luxury team. Meaning, if you go $2mil into the tax, you don't just lose $2mil or whatever they penalty is. You lose the payout of money distributed to all the non tax teams, which I think is around $17mil or so recently.
But those amounts will be going way down, because teams such as the Clippers and Warriors won't be able to spend what they used to spend.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:25 pm to shel311
quote:
16-17 with BI and no Zion last season. 36-46 the full season before.
We truthfully have not seen BI lead us to wins without Zion.
People keep ignoring that he's not a very efficient scorer, and he's a negative defender.
I really question if BI is good enough to be a legit #2 on a title team, though I'll admit he hasn't peaked yet.
The argument that he could be our #1 and we could have any kind of success? Dumb.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:30 pm to Sheep
Hayward is an asset baw
Good player on an expiring contract and he makes the money work.
Good player on an expiring contract and he makes the money work.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:32 pm to GOP_Tiger
People are really discounting that Suns series where it took
Ayton shooting 70%, Paul having 3 outrageous games, including a 14-14 performance, CJ playing like shite all series, and the officiating handing the Suns game 6, for the Pels to lose without Zion.
Brandon Ingram is very good.
Ayton shooting 70%, Paul having 3 outrageous games, including a 14-14 performance, CJ playing like shite all series, and the officiating handing the Suns game 6, for the Pels to lose without Zion.
Brandon Ingram is very good.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:38 pm to 3PieceSpicy
Or Ingram didn’t step up in Game 5 and/or 6. He had 22 and 21 points in the most critical games of the series. He played great in the 3 games before. I mean honestly you want ti pick out stuff to make your pount better. I could do the same on the other side of the argument.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:39 pm to BradleyBadd
quote:I’ll bet they do, LOL. The superstar who plays over the one who barely plays. Tough decision.
Charlotte would prefer BI
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:41 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
People are really discounting that Suns series
Yeah, I don't base all my assessments on one playoff series.
Especially against a team that promptly lost in the next round to a weak Dallas team.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:42 pm to Sofaking2
quote:look I like Bi but he’s not a superstar cmon.
The superstar
Posted on 6/18/23 at 2:58 pm to 3PieceSpicy
“for the Pels to lose without Zion.” Seems hard for the current BI haters/traders to sink in…Zion is the problem and the key to pels succes…25/6/6 is great #s from Bi… a 2…1B ish
And I kind of agree that bi isn’t a complete superstar. If he was putn those numbers up for a large market team, he would be. But he don’t like the lights of the big market…he wants to be here
And I kind of agree that bi isn’t a complete superstar. If he was putn those numbers up for a large market team, he would be. But he don’t like the lights of the big market…he wants to be here
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 4:04 pm
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News