- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/5/22 at 9:05 am to 50_Tiger
CJ is 30 and fox is 24
if the cost is similar you go get the younger guy 10/10
I’d rather trade less for hield and try again to find a cheaper facilitator elsewhere
if the cost is similar you go get the younger guy 10/10
I’d rather trade less for hield and try again to find a cheaper facilitator elsewhere
Posted on 2/5/22 at 9:44 am to GOP_Tiger
For a CJ deal Hart, Graham or Jonas has to go out, only way we can make money work
Posted on 2/5/22 at 9:46 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Executives around the league believe the Trail Blazers will move CJ McCollum by the trade deadline or this offseason, per @MikeAScotto
“Several teams, including the New Orleans Pelicans, Dallas Mavericks, and others, are expected to have interest in trading for McCollum” LINK
Posted on 2/5/22 at 9:49 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
The New Orleans Pelicans are reportedly "pretty active looking to buy" on the trade market and have made veteran guard Josh Hart available in talks, ESPN's Brian Windhorst said on his Hoop Collective podcast (h/t HoopsHype).
Windhorst added that the Pelicans have held trade talks with the Atlanta Hawks regarding Kevin Huerter, the Portland Trail Blazers about CJ McCollum, the Houston Rockets regarding Eric Gordon and the Sacramento Kings about De'Aaron Fox.
SIAP
This post was edited on 2/5/22 at 9:50 am
Posted on 2/5/22 at 9:52 am to cgrand
From Michael Scotto at HoopsHype
LINK
What would the Mavs trade for CJ? Finney-Smith or Brunson? Everything I've seen about Dallas trading instead of paying those guys would be to keep future flexibility.
"and others"? I know this is reportedly sourced from rival execs, but it sounds like a poorly drafted Portland leak to drive up CJ's low price.
quote:
With the emergence of Simons and the selling off of veterans like Powell and Covington, rival executives around the league believe the Trail Blazers will move CJ McCollum by the trade deadline or this offseason as Portland continues to reshape its roster around franchise star Damian Lillard. Several teams, including the New Orleans Pelicans, Dallas Mavericks, and others, are expected to have interest in trading for McCollum, who is owed $69.13 million over the next two seasons.
LINK
What would the Mavs trade for CJ? Finney-Smith or Brunson? Everything I've seen about Dallas trading instead of paying those guys would be to keep future flexibility.
"and others"? I know this is reportedly sourced from rival execs, but it sounds like a poorly drafted Portland leak to drive up CJ's low price.
This post was edited on 2/5/22 at 9:54 am
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:06 am to GOP_Tiger
I know theres interest, but CJ makes 30 million, to salary match we have to send Hart, Graham or Jonas, only way to get to the 28-29 million required without gutting the team by sending Sato, Temple, NAW, Hayes and minimums.
Sato, NAW, Temple, Jax, Didi works salary wise, but guts the team.
On the flip side, Hart, Sato and one of Temple, NAW, Kira, Hayes works salary wise.
Sato, NAW, Temple, Jax, Didi works salary wise, but guts the team.
On the flip side, Hart, Sato and one of Temple, NAW, Kira, Hayes works salary wise.
This post was edited on 2/5/22 at 10:13 am
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:21 am to Soggymoss
they aren’t trading CJ for our scrubs and salary ballast.
there would have to me major draft capital attached
let the mavs have CJ
there would have to me major draft capital attached
let the mavs have CJ
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:28 am to Soggymoss
quote:
For a CJ deal Hart, Graham or Jonas has to go out, only way we can make money work
Not true. It will be probably be Sato + Hart or Graham + NAW or Hayes. You could even do it without giving up Hayes or NAW as Hart+Sato+Willy+Didi works. I’d assume though if we did that we would have to take back some small salary in our Melli TE for roster purposes. So we it would be more likely Sato+Hart+Willy + Didi for CJ + Snell, Zeller, or McLemore.
Edit: I misread your post. I thought you were saying it had to have Hart + Graham or Jonas.
This post was edited on 2/5/22 at 10:53 am
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:37 am to Baron
Gotta keep Hayes now that he's flashing some huge potential that he was drafted on. And I think Griff / FO will really try to keep Murphy. Think they want to keep Kira, and other teams might not even put value on him with his injury.
So it seems like the available players for trade are:
Satoransky (expiring salary)
Hart
Graham
NAW
Temple
And all the picks. Feels more likely they would overpay with an extra future 1st or two, in order to keep the developing potential players in the fold (Hayes, Murphy, Kira).
So it seems like the available players for trade are:
Satoransky (expiring salary)
Hart
Graham
NAW
Temple
And all the picks. Feels more likely they would overpay with an extra future 1st or two, in order to keep the developing potential players in the fold (Hayes, Murphy, Kira).
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:38 am to Baron
Ummm, you're sending out Hart or Graham....
Which is exactly what i said we would have to do....
Which is exactly what i said we would have to do....
This post was edited on 2/5/22 at 10:41 am
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:39 am to cgrand
Yall seriously overvalue CJ, hes not fetching much more than salary and a young player, he's on the wrong side of 30 on a big contract and has had alot of inuuries popping up.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:44 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Ummm, you're sending out Hart or Graham....
Which is exactly what i said we would have to do....
Yep, sorry misread your post. I’m going to blame 99% on my reading comprehension skills and 1% on the missing Oxford comma.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:45 am to Baron
All good, i do it all the time!
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:51 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Getting back on track, what team was stupid enough to offer that
Well, there were reports that we were interested and Griffin is still running the team, so….
quote:
and why was Dallas stupid enough to turn it down?
I guess they don’t want to lose him for the playoffs and/or they have decided they are going to keep him this off-season. This could be a sign that they decided to keep him at his price in the off-season rather than Brunson because I don’t see how they pay both.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:55 am to Soggymoss
quote:DFS is a solid player.
and why was Dallas stupid enough to turn it down?
Dallas is trying to win now. I don't see the value in moving him for a pick that you'd hope in 3-4 years can net you a player about as good as DFS
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:55 am to Baron
quote:
Well, there were reports that we were interested and Griffin is still running the team, so….
My first thought was this, but we already traded our picks this year, so has to be someone else.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 11:01 am to Soggymoss
Indy? Carlisle did coach him for 5 years.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 11:05 am to cgrand
quote:Agree. However, cannot see the cost being anywhere close. I would have to think Fox is not a realistic target. I certainly hope we do not settle for Gordon.
CJ is 30 and fox is 24
if the cost is similar you go get the younger guy 10/10
Popular
Back to top



1




