Started By
Message

The Beatles...

Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:01 am
Posted by Coach Guidry
Member since Nov 2007
2333 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:01 am
If they had continued after Let It Be...what do you think they would have sounded like? Would they have fallen apart with the harder rock music of the time?
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25428 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:03 am to
They might have sounded something like their solo careers. Really, I think that the Beatles had run their course. They made a ton of music together.
Posted by Spaulding Smails
Milano’s Bar
Member since Jun 2012
18805 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:04 am to
John and Paul were still able to make great music Post-Beatles, so I think they would've fared just fine. Assuming they didn't hate each other and worked as a team, etc
Posted by Coach Guidry
Member since Nov 2007
2333 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:05 am to
True...I think WINGS was the closest to what they would have sounded like as the Beatles.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
65088 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

John, Paul and George were still able to make great music Post-Beatles

FIFY
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21591 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

John and Paul were still able to make great music Post-Beatles, so I think they would've fared just fine


Do you even All Things Must Pass, bro?
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
46174 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:33 am to
ELO

Pretty sure that's what Lennon said.
Posted by Child of the Missip
Member since May 2012
1522 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:37 am to
The Beatles suck big balls
Posted by Ryne Sandberg
Team Am Mart
Member since Apr 2009
19746 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:39 am to
I love Let It Be. It is tied with Abbey Road as my favorite Beatles albums.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5521 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:53 am to
They would've sounded like Electric Light Orchestra. At least that's what John Lennon thought so I'll go with his opinion.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 10:55 am
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20182 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

If they had continued after Let It Be...what do you think they would have sounded like?

They did....and they recorded an album called Abbey Road, their best album imo.

No one could predict what they would have sounded like after Abbey Road because they all wanted to go in different directions. The White Album kind of resembles this as John, Paul and George all did their own thing on the album. They couldn't have been as magical though had they kept doing this over and over. Individually they grew too big for the band and it was time to go solo.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20182 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

John and Paul were still able to make great music Post-Beatles, so I think they would've fared just fine. Assuming they didn't hate each other and worked as a team, etc

George Harrison's "All Things Must Pass" destroys anything John and Paul recorded post-Beatles.
Posted by Coach Guidry
Member since Nov 2007
2333 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

They did....and they recorded an album called Abbey Road, their best album imo.


Let it Be was not FINISHED until after Abbey Road...
Posted by cigsmcgee
LR
Member since May 2012
5233 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:30 pm to
the only way it would have worked is going back to White Album style recording. each guy doing his thing, getting so many cuts on an album, etc...

youd probably have three Beatles albums meshed together with some choice tracks from their first couple solo albums...
Posted by uglycasanova7
Member since Feb 2011
1284 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:36 pm to
I think John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band was the direction they were headed. However, All Things Must Pass sounded like everything that was awesome about the Beatles.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20182 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Let it Be was not FINISHED until after Abbey Road...

They were finished recording the songs....they just weren't edited because they abandoned the project and didn't speak til Abbey Road's sessions. That's when Paul McCartney and Phil Spector put the finishing touches on it. Harrison helped a bit too. But that was it. Lennon had already left the band a few months before they resurrected Let It Be.

Let It Be was a near disaster. The film is very interesting....you can see that they pretty much hated being in the same room together during that time.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 2:51 pm
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
24864 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:52 pm to
George was by far the best Beatle.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
65088 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

George was by far the best Beatle.


His is the only solo Beatle stuff I listen to anymore. Great songwriter. Saw him in concert at the Assembly Center way back when.
Posted by OldTigahFot
Drinkin' with the rocket scientists
Member since Jan 2012
10507 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

George was by far the best Beatle.


I always thought his was the best of the solo efforts. Paul's meodies were brilliant but his lyrics were nonsensical. John, on the other hand, seemed satisfied with basic rock chords that wouldn't overshadow his poetic genius. They seemed to "miss" each other.

Posted by charlieg14
Member since Mar 2006
3076 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 11:18 pm to
[quote]True...I think WINGS was the closest to what they would have sounded like as the Beatles.
[/quote

Good band , but wouldn't have been like wings because John's influence would have meant neither John or Paul dominant with their own sound.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram