Started By
Message

re: The Beatles are The Most Overrated Band Of All Time

Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by CaptainPanic
18.44311,-64.764021
Member since Sep 2011
25582 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:51 pm to
PEEJ

What's good, f4m?
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21591 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

dukke v



Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40140 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

dukke v

The GOAT hath spoken
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216475 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
157377 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

dukke v
Finally, the voice of reason
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40140 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:13 pm to
Peej have you listened to the new Real Estate album yet?
Posted by TurkeysAndBees
Member since Jan 2017
651 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Let's be real here, every album before Rubber soul was... not good


I agree 100%....absolutely....just 50's doo-wop rehashed...just as everything else was in the early to mid 60's But what happened at Abbey Road St. John's Wood / EMI from 1966 to 1969 launched innovations and opened doors for modern or popular music into the art forms that we have today. I agree it was a synergy of George Martin and two or three exceptionally creative fellows but there's not a major record producer today that has not studied those sessions as if they were the Holy Grail. The palettes that were left to be used from those sessions still stand as the "encyclopedia" or "Bible" of pop / rock music.. Even the high end manufacturers and circuit designers of state-of-the-art production equipment, processors, recording consoles, mics, etc, still strive to recreate the myriad of sounds and textures that were born there. Songwriters and musicians, whether they know it or not are still using the templates that opened up and branched out to genres and sub-genres of lyrical expression and using textures of sound to create landscapes the listener can to escape to and stimulate his/her imagination. It's still the way music is made today and not much in the way of production has changed since. Just listen to 12 hours daily of the 1930's & 1940's crooners, the 1950's and 60's doo-woppers, the R&B and county western balladeers of those periods singing the accepted verse-chorus-bridge-outro format, the almost mindless, innocuous tales of teen puppy love, dreamy romance, and heartache, ad nauseum... ..Do that for about a month to get an understanding of what music was to society in general for decades up until 1965, skip '66-'69, jump to 1970, put on some Zappa, Bowie, Ramones, Dead, Led Zep and up to Marley, Nirvana, The Mars Volta, Radiohead, St. Vincent, ...and Kanye. Those four years at EMI bridged the gap and opened it up to all that followed.

I didn't mean to write War and Peace but I can't agree more about the Beatles first ten or so albums... but it would be hard to overrate what was conceived in and born of the rest.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39873 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

every album before Rubber soul was
Nah. Beatles for Sale A Hard Day's Night and Help were great.
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
46146 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

The Beatles

Not the greatest musicians

Objectively the greatest band of all time

Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
20010 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

The Beatles are The Most Overrated Band Of All Time
quote:

every album before Rubber soul was... not good
Those are two mutually exclusive concepts.

Without debating either contention, please enlighten me: name some specific albums by popular music artists released between March 1963 (when Please Please Me, their first album featuring original songs, was released in the UK) and December 1965 (when Rubber Soul came out) that you think were better than any of the Beatles' LP releases in that timeframe.

I'd love to hear what you consider not "...not good".
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39873 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Not the greatest musicians
What's the definition of "musician"? I would put McCartney up there with virtually anybody in terms of musicianship.
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
33526 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 4:19 pm to
How was your backstage visit with One Direction?
Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
9767 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:38 pm to
Wrong
Posted by TexTigah81
Member since Nov 2013
585 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Not the greatest musicians



The Beatles were very underrated as musicians. Just because, in the early years, they wore their little suits and the little girls screamed so loud they couldn't hear themselves singing & playing they were considered by many to be a "boy band" and not good musicians. They didn't really start maturing as musicians until they quit touring in 1966 and went in the studio full time. McCartney was probably the most talented. He played bass, piano, guitar, lead guitar on several songs and drums on some songs when Ringo had quit for a short time in 1968 or 1969. He played ALL the instruments on his first solo album "Cherries". Lennon played rhythm guitar, lead guitar on some songs, piano, and harmonica. Harrison played lead guitar, slide, bass and the sitar. Ringo was a good drummer with excellent timing that was a perfect fit for them. He actually was "hand-picked" by George Martin out of all the drummers in England. Just because Harrison didn't rip out a 3 minute lead and Starr didn't have a 5 minute drum solo didn't mean they weren't good musicians. The Beatles didn't write songs that included long guitar leads or drum solos. They were more into lyrics, harmonies & melodies. Regardless of what anyone thinks of The Beatles as musicians there is one fact that is undebatable. The Beatles were the GOAT!
Posted by WhopperDawg
Member since Aug 2013
3073 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

The Beatles were very underrated as musicians


True dat and anyone that disses the Beatles just isn't too bright.

Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

rubber lol
Posted by ElroyJetSon
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
4018 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 8:12 am to
I love The Beatles but Imagine by John Lennon is one of the worst songs I've ever heard
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
157377 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19311 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

.just 50's doo-wop rehashed...just as everything else was in the early to mid 60's
Totally disagree.

The doo-wop sound was dying out in the late 50's, giving way to the folk music rebirth in New York and Elvis's "rockabilly" appeal in The South. The West Coast was Beach Boys and the Bakersfield sound.

It was the British Invasion, led by The Beatles, that re-invigorated the rock-n-roll spirit because it became vigorous and innovative again. They continued to innovate and pioneered one of the most profound decades in music.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 10:43 pm to
I think you have everyone convinced this time. Not so sure that you understand what you have convinced everyone of.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram