Started By
Message

re: Which movie kicked off the boom in comic movies?

Posted on 4/10/14 at 10:13 am to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

X-men (2000)


X-Men is still the best superhero movie out there.
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24684 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 11:11 am to


'nuff said . . .
Posted by sportsaddit68
Hammond
Member since Sep 2008
6577 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 11:53 am to
quote:

X-Men 2 is still the best superhero movie out there.


Fixed it to my liking.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:17 pm to
X-Men.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61479 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Daredevil hands down. Beautifully put together accompanied with a great showing by Affleck while he was hitting his stride...



the success of Spiderman actually screwed up Daredevil b/c the studio then started to demand it be lighter in tone, started cutting out the violence, and forced in a happier Electra love story.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61479 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure how it could be Blade when Batman and Robin came out the year before and was monetarily more successful.


B/c B&R was so monumentally awful it damn near killed the comic book movie genre.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:13 pm to
X men really started it off making a few hundred million. That movie made executives feel comfortable putting money behind comic book themed films.

Two years later spider man makes $821,708,551. Blade didn't make as close to an impact. The significance in comparison on the film industry..is basically the same refelection as with the comic book industry.

What means more to comic book collectors, and has more overall importance in the comic world? x men or blade?
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:37 pm to
It's gotta be X-Men, as that's the first movie from Marvel Studios after it reorganized. X-Men was the first real attempt by Marvel to profit off of its comic characters at the box office. And really, it was because the technology finally allowed you to do it. Before, comic movies just weren't feasible because of the special effects. You could do super strength (and let's face it, poor flight), but that's about it. X-Men showed A) these characters were valuable and there was a built in market for them and B) we had the technology to make the film look good.

Blade is sort of a proto comic film, but it was pitched as a vampire film more than anything. And they weren't banking on the superhero part of it. X-Men ushered in the era of superheroes replacing action heroes. Blade is a middle ground between the two.
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
6556 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:39 pm to
You are all wrong. Stan Lee was in the damn movie that kick started the whole Marvel comic book movie craze...Mallrats (1995)

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477247 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:53 pm to
X-Men

it didn't have a large budget. that should tell you everything about the place of the "comic book movie" when it came out
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram