- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When They See Us (Netflix)
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:28 am to Byrdybyrd05
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:28 am to Byrdybyrd05
"5 minorities get wrongfully accused and incarcerated for a heinous crime? They should just deal with it and knock it off with the guilt trips."
-mattchewbocca
-mattchewbocca
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:06 am to sicboy
quote:
-mattchewbocca
that will be a great thread
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:16 am to QJenk
quote:
So this is legit. I didn't trust it cuz I saw it being talked about by some of the typical "everything is racist" crowd. But now I actuallt really wanna check it out.
The evidence shows they did attack the woman, and the man who confessed to the rape in jail was never interrogated by police. There is also no evidence whatsoever that their confessions were coerced or their rights were violated by the police.
LINK
quote:
only a fool—or perhaps a liar—could think that “the Central Park Five” were innocent of anything, much less the attack on Trisha Meili
This show sounds like pure propaganda meant specifically for people who want to be told what to believe. These guys have never retracted the confession that their sole intent for being in Central Park that night was to attack and terrorize innocent people, and there is no reason to believe they did not attack the jogger. They had done it before.
quote:
Multiple videotaped confessions of “the Five”; the presence of semen, blood, and hair on all of the suspects; a scratch on Kevin Richardson’s neck that, in the company of his father, he admitted he received by Meili; and several witness accounts confirmed for the police that the vermin who Ken Burns would years later make into martyrs were as guilty as sin itself of initiating and facilitating an attack against Trisha Meili that nearly cost the poor woman her life. Matias Reyes semen was the only attacker’s DNA found on Meili or at the crime scene. However, neither this nor the word of this serial rapist and murderer that he acted alone goes any distance whatsoever toward proving the innocence of “the Central Park Five.”
quote:
Linda Fairstein, the original prosecutor in this case, expressed her certainty that “the Central Park Five” are guilty. Reyes, she believes, merely finished what they had started. As for this notion that the NYPD “coerced” false confessions from the suspects, Mike Sheehan, one of the central detectives who investigated the crime, and who, in his own words, had spent decades taking “over 1,000 confessions, in 3,000 homicides,” has nothing but contempt. “All of this stuff about coercion really pisses me off,” Sheehan has said. “Do you honestly think that we—detectives with more than 20 years in, family men with pensions—would risk all of that so we could put words in the mouth of a 15 year-old kid? Absolutely not.”
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 10:18 am
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:07 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
All of this stuff about coercion really pisses me off,” Sheehan has said. “Do you honestly think that we—detectives with more than 20 years in, family men with pensions—would risk all of that so we could put words in the mouth of a 15 year-old kid? Absolutely not.”
Thats a pretty dumb argument. That shite happens all the time
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:23 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
imjustafatkid
Oh shite, he's in both threads on this series...

Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:29 am to JBeam
I love when people post links from Pro Trump websites. Wow such credibility they have.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:16 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
I love when people post links from Pro Trump websites
What about links from anti-Trump websites which includes 99% of all Mainstream News sites?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:16 pm to JBeam
“You think the guy in a 3,000 dollar suit would coerce a confession?? CMON!”

Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:18 pm to Bonkers119
Most of ya'll on this board are incredibly zhitty at picking heroes....
This incident aside, these were some garbage human beings who committed much mayhem...
This incident aside, these were some garbage human beings who committed much mayhem...
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:21 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
I love when people post links from Pro Trump websites. Wow such credibility they have.
Pro-Trump websites? How very foolish of you. Do the New York Times or CNN better suit your needs?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:26 pm to imjustafatkid
If the police had found Reyes in 1989, those 5 kids would have never been charged.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:31 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
If the police had found Reyes in 1989, those 5 kids would have never been charged.
Pure speculation resulting from your personal bias.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:31 pm to imjustafatkid
Those are just links to the findings of the Police Panel. Again, the NYPD Panel had bias to determine their detectives did nothing wrong. Of course they are gonna say that.
Please don't ruin two threads. Stick to the one that better fits your narrative.
Please don't ruin two threads. Stick to the one that better fits your narrative.
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:32 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Pure speculation resulting from your personal bias.
LOL
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:32 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Do the New York Times or CNN better suit your needs?
Neither of these articles really say anything
quote:
Taken together, the police and prosecutor's reports consider the same facts, but draw opposing conclusions, the police defending their actions and the prosecutors theirs, with neither acknowledging mistakes by investigators in 1989. Thus, it appears increasingly likely that the mysteries of a signature case in the annals of New York crime may never be totally resolved.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:35 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Those are just links to the findings of the Police Panel
Versus the word of a criminal and a skewed Documentary?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:42 pm to Bonkers119
I love how people watch these propaganda films and use them as the basis to form their opinions, as though these films have any interest in presenting the facts fairly.
The people who made this have an agenda: poor poor black people, evil evil white people. That's the story they want to tell and that's the story they will tell. Facts be damned.
The people who made this have an agenda: poor poor black people, evil evil white people. That's the story they want to tell and that's the story they will tell. Facts be damned.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:45 pm to Salmon
quote:
neither acknowledging mistakes by investigators in 1989
That's saying quite a lot, actually.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:46 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Those are just links to the findings of the Police Panel. Again, the NYPD Panel had bias to determine their detectives did nothing wrong. Of course they are gonna say that.
Here's a link to the NYDA filing that asked to set aside the convictions. Could you point to me where it claims the men are innocent? LINK
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 12:47 pm
Popular
Back to top



2








