Started By
Message

We’re Dangerously Close to Another #OscarsSoWhite Year

Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:53 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
62114 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:53 am
Oh the horror

quote:

Few people have noticed yet, but the Oscars could be barreling toward repeating some not-so-great history.

In March, Michael B. Jordan walked onto the Dolby Theatre stage and collected the best actor Oscar for “Sinners,” one of four wins for a film that set the all-time record with 16 nominations. He is the sixth Black man in 98 years to win the prize. Now, eight months later, if the pundits are reading the race correctly, the door his win seemed to open could be swinging shut.

In Gold Derby’s aggregated predictions in late October, three actors of color sat in nomination positions across the four acting categories and not one director of color made the projected five. In the lead races, nine of the 10 projected slots belonged to white performers. Mexican Australian breakout Inde Navarrette was the lone exception.

If that holds through nominations morning on Jan. 21, we’ll be reliving January 2015, when all 20 acting nominees were white and April Reign gave the industry the infamous hashtag it still hasn’t shaken: #OscarsSoWhite. It happened again the following year. After each time, the Academy promised it had learned something and was making changes.


quote:

Here’s what makes this year so maddening. The talent is there. The bench is deep, and it’s full of work that stands up to anything in the predicted fields. What’s missing is the buzz, and the buzz doesn’t build itself.

So let’s talk about who could stop history from repeating.

Start with Zendaya. The 30-year-old is one of the most famous actors on the planet, and she still has zero Oscar nominations. Few actors ever have a year like the one she’s having.

She opened 2026 with A24’s “The Drama,” then turned up in two of the year’s biggest hits, “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” and “The Odyssey.” Now Warner Bros. is moving her to best actress for Chani in “Dune: Part Three,” opening Dec. 18, after positioning her as supporting in the first two films.



read more
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
29376 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

“Sinners,” one of four wins for a film that set the all-time record with 16 nominations.


This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 10:59 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:59 am to
Zendaya had fewer than a dozen lines in The Odyssey if memory serves. She mainly just spent the entire film haunting Matt Damon's Odysseus by staring at him sadly. And who the hell is going to jot her name down for a nomination for Spider-Man?

Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
24061 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Here’s what makes this year so maddening. The talent is there. The bench is deep, and it’s full of work that stands up to anything in the predicted fields.


They need to show their work here.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
71561 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Start with Zendaya. The 30-year-old is one of the most famous actors on the planet, and she still has zero Oscar nominations.

Fame has absolutely nothing to do with being the best actor. In her case she should have gotten an Emmy nomination for Euphoria, but she's done nothing in movies to warrant an Oscar nomination.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Zendaya had fewer than a dozen lines in The Odyssey if memory serves. She mainly just spent the entire film haunting Matt Damon's Odysseus by staring at him sadly. And who the hell is going to jot her name down for a nomination for Spider-Man?


If she gets a nomination, it will be for Dune. It’s a long shot, though. Dune is more of a technical achievement than a masterclass in acting.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
10129 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:56 am to
It is shameful how Hollywood continues to deny space for the contributions of the many People of Color, particularly Black Womyn who have done more to contribute to the success of Hollywood in the past century than anyone. It's a great national embarrassment.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 11:57 am
Posted by The Shins
Member since Oct 2026
15 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Few people have noticed yet, but the Oscars could be barreling toward repeating some not-so-great history.




well that was the most racist article I read today.

That author should be fired and never allowed to write again.
Posted by MAROON
Houston
Member since Jul 2012
2614 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

well that was the most racist article I read today.


the author is black so he can't be a racist. Only those that disagree with him are racist.

When will Hollywood acknowledge that they entire film industry was built on the backs of black workers and artists?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
61046 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

They need to show their work here.


:thatsracistgif.meme:
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6562 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Here’s what makes this year so maddening


This is really dumb concern trolling.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
117086 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 3:02 pm to
Is this the thread where we get mad because we extrapolate a variety article to be some broad opinion held by a noteworthy amount of people
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
8224 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Is this the thread where we get mad because we extrapolate a variety article to be some broad opinion held by a noteworthy amount of people


I may be misremembering, but didn't this happen some years back where there was all of the sudden a major concern that there wasn't enough black people winning. Then the entire way judging was done was changed to include mandatory diversity quotas?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
29376 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Is this the thread where we get mad because we extrapolate a variety article to be some broad opinion held by a noteworthy amount of people


Apparently it's the thread where we pretend that the people who decide who wins (are they noteworthy enough?) haven't already codified DEI nonsense into their selection criteria.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
31783 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 3:59 pm to
As much as I love Zendaya, she hasn’t done anything Oscar worthy.
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
12606 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Start with Zendaya. The 30-year-old is one of the most famous actors on the planet, and she still has zero Oscar nominations. Few actors ever have a year like the one she’s having.


So she should be nominated just because she's famous and has color?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
36640 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Start with Zendaya. The 30-year-old is one of the most famous actors on the planet, and she still has zero Oscar nominations. Few actors ever have a year like the one she’s having.


Famous actors who have never been nominated:
Jim Carrey
John Goodman
Donald Sutherland
Kevin Bacon
Seve Buscemi
Alan Rickman
Richard Gere
Meg Ryan
Steve Martin
Pam Grier

Just to name a few (list tabulated by AI, and admittedly I did not double check, so if some are incorrect then my mistake).


This is in no way intended to compliment or insult Zendaya's acting ability; rather it is to illustrate some INSANELY successful and talented actors and actresses have also never been nominated.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
29376 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Alan Rickman


I don't really follow awards shows but that's absurd.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
36640 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

“Sinners,” one of four wins for a film that set the all-time record with 16 nominations.


While I find "number of nominations" to be an interesting metric, it's tied directly to who all you're up against as much as it is how good the movie is.

Sort of like BYU having won a national title in 1984 - good for them, but their competition was mediocre. Hell, at the time, the 13 wins they got seemed impossible. 13 games seemed like too many back then... but I digress.


Films like Titanic were up against Good Will Hunting, LA Confidential, As Good As It Gets, Donnie Brasco... and Schindler's List was up against Philadelphia, The Fugitive, In The Name of The Father, The Remains of the Day, and The Piano.

The Fellowship of the Ring had the most nominations the year it came out, but was up against A Beautiful Mind, Moulin Rouge!, I Am Sam, Memento, Monster's Ball, and The Royal Tenenbaums.

So "most nominations" in a single year is neat, and they should be happy with the achievement, but most nominations ever is an odd metric when it can only be counted per year.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
22944 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:31 pm to
"Dangerously close"

That verbiage is very racist.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram