- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: tOfficial Better Call Saul Season 6 Episode 1 and 2 Thread (Page 15/16 spoil zone)
Posted on 4/13/22 at 7:59 pm to Displaced
Posted on 4/13/22 at 7:59 pm to Displaced
Man Saul screwed Kim. Mike was right to say "she's in the game now" when Saul admitted he told her about the pickup. Lalo was also right: Saul is a cockroach. Kim will end up dead and Saul will end up in prison.
3
Posted on 4/13/22 at 8:07 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Man Saul screwed Kim
No, Kim has made her own decisions.
quote:
Kim will end up dead
Nope. Maybe jail. She's not going to be killed.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 8:16 pm to rebelrouser
Posted on 4/13/22 at 8:45 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
Just wanted to say, the episode "Fly" is an hour of my life I wish I could have back. That was one of the worst episodes of any TV show I've ever watched in my life.
Early episode titles and synopses for season 6!
Posted on 4/13/22 at 8:51 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Man Saul screwed Kim. Mike was right to say "she's in the game now" when Saul admitted he told her about the pickup. Lalo was also right: Saul is a cockroach. Kim will end up dead and Saul will end up in prison.
yup. saul put her in significant danger by doing so.
how many people in the BB/BCS universe has being involved in the game even tangentially have been better off for it?
A big fat 0.
it will certainly cost their relationship at a minimum to explain why she isn't in BB. it has cost everyone either their lives, jail, or significant financial/emotional hardship with loss of loved ones. why would kim and saul be any different?
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:04 pm to AMS
quote:
it will certainly cost their relationship at a minimum to explain why she isn't in BB
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:05 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
No, Kim has made her own decisions.
jimmy is the sole person to blame for getting her involved in the game by telling her. just the fact that she knew about it got her in the game, participation not required. she may have gone along with it after the fact, but jimmy is the only cause of her being in the game.
quote:
Nope. Maybe jail. She's not going to be killed.
you dont see how this poses a significant problem with your theory about how she is involved throughout BB? she certainly isnt coming out the other side unscathed, no one does in BB/BCS.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:17 pm to AMS
quote:
you dont see how this poses a significant problem with your theory
Yes, I do, but I my theory is based off things Vince and Peter have shown us. They hinted at jail once when Kim was looking at the Mesa Verde models, so I have to consider it's a possibility. They've hinted many more times that she's working with him, so I still feel good about it.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:43 pm to AMS
quote:
jimmy is the sole person to blame for getting her involved in the game by telling her.
This is just wrong. After the Mesa Verde meeting with Saul she demanded full transparency. He didn't want to tell her about being the bagman, but she wants to know everything. She was the one who chose to go and speak with Lalo. It blows my mind that people still think Kim is just an innocent bystander.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:48 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
Yes, I do, but I my theory is based off things Vince and Peter have shown us. They hinted at jail once when Kim was looking at the Mesa Verde models, so I have to consider it's a possibility. They've hinted many more times that she's working with him, so I still feel good about it.
that literally hasn't been hinted at once. inventing a backstory for ISZA isnt a hint she is working in the shadows during BB. Neither is a desk or piece of jewelry.
all the 'easter eggs' you built a theory around are just small details VP/PG nerded out on and used to create a backstory for kim out of things they already had done without any thought or planning for a kim wexler to exist.
my theory is based off things vince and peter have shown us. literally every relationship and life ruined. just the fact that there are only easter eggs and an entirely absent kim should be an even bigger hint. but sure kim and sauls relationship is gonna be preserved everything is gonna be hunky dory.
kim is probably going to be disbarred and jailed during her war with howard or less likely killed. she is 'breaking bad' and outpacing jimmy for malfeasance at this point. She left breadcrumbs with those mesa verde blueprint milk spill switcharoo by using her real job and position. the huell church volunteer ruse can likewise be uncovered if going to war with howard. I dont think VG is so lame as to retcon something so unnecessary as kim wexler working in the shadows when there is a much more interesting and dramatic arc of downfall for her which has been building the entire BCS series.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:55 pm to AMS
quote:
that literally hasn't been hinted at once.
I told you over a season in advance that they would be married based off an Easter egg. Everyone acted like you are now.
Vince showed you what he had planned in the very first episode.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 9:58 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
jimmy is the sole person to blame for getting her involved in the game by telling her.
This is just wrong. After the Mesa Verde meeting with Saul she demanded full transparency. He didn't want to tell her about being the bagman, but she wants to know everything. She was the one who chose to go and speak with Lalo. It blows my mind that people still think Kim is just an innocent bystander.
it is just correct. mike even basically said so. thats why he kept his family in the dark, so they wouldn't be involved and they certainly wouldn't have participated.
If jimmy didnt tell her, she would not and could not be in the game, period. it doesnt matter if she wanted to be involved, but I agree she was willing to participate and is not an innocent bystander. that doesn't change the fact that jimmys decision to inform her is what got her in the game, period. her participation after the fact is irrelevant she was involved by pure virtue of knowledge due to jimmy.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:04 pm to AMS
Well, the time is almost here to find out, so we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:05 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
I told you over a season in advance that they would be married based off an Easter egg. Everyone acted like you are now.
it doesnt take an easter egg to predict them getting married. they were living together... also they are lawyers committing crime. they even discussed getting married so they can't testify against each other. its just a common law-crime tv occurrence.
quote:
Vince showed you what he had planned in the very first episode.
you mean the part where he is clearly lonely looking back on old commercials of himself and kim wexler is still absent?
This post was edited on 4/13/22 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:08 pm to AMS
quote:
it doesnt take an easter egg to predict them getting married.
Then why did everyone think I was nuts for predicting it? Here's the Easter egg. Them holding hands making an M for McGill in the bride and groom spots. More than a year before it happened.
This post was edited on 4/13/22 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:18 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
Then why did everyone think I was nuts. Here's the Easter egg. Them holding hands making an M for McGill. More than a year before it happened.
bc your theories of kim are bonkers and entirely unnecessary
lets just forget the part where they lived together and were sleeping together... it has to be that they form an M while holding hands. if you said that instead of they formed an M people wouldn't have thought you were nuts.
also I suspect the naysayers said nay more on the basis that kim isnt in BB, while you use things like this to say she is. you may have been correct about predicting their marriage, but not for an easter egg.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:22 pm to AMS
Like I said, it's time to find out. I feel good about it. I'm done arguing about it.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:26 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
Like I said, it's time to find out. I feel good about it. I'm done arguing about it.
your hand holding in form of an M easter egg theory was incorrect... they formed an M for mcgill so they must get married.
kim's last name is still wexler. She didnt take jimmy's last name, no M was formed. also the whole no middle name thing could nullify the marriage. it was brought up for a reason.
This post was edited on 4/13/22 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:35 pm to AMS
quote:
kim's last name is still wexler.
That shot was meant to foreshadow. I guess they would have to sit down and do a prenuptial for you to admit it.
Posted on 4/13/22 at 10:42 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
That shot was meant to foreshadow. I guess they would have to sit down and do a prenuptial for you to admit it.
you said M was for mcgill so they get married.
kim didnt take the mcgill name. saul made a point and corrected people her last name was still wexler.
there was no M = Mcgill.
its just a fact that your easter egg theory was incorrect, but i don't think anything will get you to admit it.
Page 6 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News