Started By
Message

re: The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power S1, Ep. 1 and 2 Thread | Amazon 9:00 pm EDT

Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

I don't know why y'all persist with this disingenuous argument.


It’s not disingenuous.

The fact is there is enough in the literature to support this decision.

You’re interpretation is different. That’s fine. But people are ignoring the evidence when they pretend this is something they invented completely and it’s butchering the character is in fact disingenuous.

You don’t have to like it. That’s a different topic.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The fact is there is enough in the literature to support this decision.
What you mean is that there is some vaguery in some small parts, and you can inject whatever you want?

Even if it is completely out of character?
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40552 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:34 pm to
Watched the 1st episode but was too tired for episode two last night. Not going to read the thread bc of spoilers but my thoughts on episode one...

It was a good episode of fantasy TV. Not sure it was a good episode of Lord of the Rings TV though. Research tells me that Galadriel actually was a warrior at one point and it wouldn't surprise me if she was a commander so that didn't necessarily bother me, but with lore it wasn't a long period of time. Hopefully she isn't a battle warrior for the entirety of this series. Her armor really gets on my nerves. It just doesn't resemble Elven armor and I don't know why they'd go away from what it would look like other than to just try and make her look badass. It is definitely more Game of Thrones than LOTR.

I'm glad that they actually showed she was centuries old instead of pretending she was a young kid. She definitely looks more of an adult in the episode than she did in the previews. Elrond as well. On the other hand, Celebrimbor looking old is odd. You just would never picture him as an old man.

Arondir and Bronwyn didn't bother me for the sole fact that Bronwyn is hot and hopefully we get more of her character. The Harfoots weren't nearly as bad as I was expecting them to be if you can look past the "they shouldnt be around right now" aspect of it.

The episode had it's moments and I like that it was true to somethings but then on the other hand it's not true to even more things and it will probably only get worse in that regard. I'm not giving up yet. Nothing yet to me was a slap in the face to Tolkien, that's probably where I'll draw the line.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Same essay, Tolkein states that she never fought in the rebellion. She and Celeborn only showing up to fight Faenor.


Ok. And?

quote:

Based only on what we KNOW about Galadriel, fighting Faenor was either: A: Supporting and healing Celebor (we KNOW she is a great healer) B: Politically fighting him in such a way (We have seen her do this many times) C: Some sort of magic battle.


You can’t say based on what you know, and then guess 3 times.

quote:

Deciding it had to be a melee fight on her part, is to assume something for which there is no evidence but is conceivable in a general sense.


It didn’t have to be a melee battle but it could have been. Again, you’re opinion and interpretation aren’t universal truth.

quote:

All their armor was described in great detail. Several times describing armor they USED to wear.


When?

Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

What you mean is that there is some vaguery in some small parts, and you can inject whatever you want? Even if it is completely out of character?


You keep saying it’s out of character

Tolkien said she was of the Amazon disposition, we know she fought in rebellions, we know she fought other battles. We know physically she was big and strong and athletic (her mother called her Man-Maiden) Her whole family had powers but also swung swords and wore armor.

You’re assuming she used her powers, but you can’t bring forth 1 example of her using those powers idk in actual combat. She collapsed a building but so did Luthien only using words of power which is likely how she did it.
This post was edited on 9/2/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
62769 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:42 pm to
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22771 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

quote:

I literally Quoted a passage Tolkien wrote that described fierce fighting and no other details.

You go to other works to fill in the details. More likely she fought fiercely in a magical or political sense.

That would fit her character perfectly.

That makes zero sense in the battle at Alqualonde.
There's zero mention or suggestion of any "magic" in that fight, but rather, the Noldor overwhelmed the Teleri because they had more advanced weapons. Weapons they had forged, some by Feanor and some in response to him, which they had already caused some alarm by wearing openly in Valinor.

Usage of politics... no. This was a sudden and fairly quick skirmish, seizing the swan ships. Was no time for that. And then, when you come down to it, the only 'politicking' going on, was the Valar and their supporters saying "Don't Go".

Feanor's group (including Celebrimbor) came and used force to take the ships. Fingolgin's group (including Galadriel) showed up and found a pitched battle, and many assumed the Teleri were trying to detain them on the Valar's orders.

The words used to describe Galadriel's actions were "fought fiercely", not "protested"... involved in a battle where Elves killed each other. The ONLY reason you would try to make that anything other than use of arms, is because she is female.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:47 pm to
“But but but my opinion says you’re lying”

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

You can’t say based on what you know, and then guess 3 times.

I listed 3 things we know she can and has done.

You are hanging your hat on one thing because of wjat the books don't explicitly say.

quote:

Ok. And?

clarifying that there was a war going on, and she didn't take part.

quote:

It didn’t have to be a melee battle but it could have been. Again, you’re opinion and interpretation aren’t universal truth.

So Tolkein is in the habit of leaving out the feats of great warriors?

quote:

When?
I mean, The Fall of Gondolin is a good source.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:53 pm to
This post was edited on 9/2/22 at 1:53 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
62769 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:55 pm to
Your posts make up about half this thread, and that has been your central message. There is nothing you've argued that isn't parroting the Amazon shill team from 4 months ago. Just so you know.

And of course, NONE of it makes her character any less awful, so you're basically just arguing the particulars of the manner in which she is awful and if it at least follows the books. Okay.
This post was edited on 9/2/22 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

That makes zero sense in the battle at Alqualonde.
and only one vague mention of Galadriel there, is being used to extrapolate and entire skillset.

Has she ever been described to use a sword?

quote:

The words used to describe Galadriel's actions were "fought fiercely"
Which can only be done in melee?

quote:

because she is female.
Whelp.

Done with this asshat
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40552 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Same with Galadriel. Use Tolkein to clarify Tolkein.


Tolkien said that she was of strong build, tall, amazon of a woman, and fought fiercely as a warrior. It's not unreasonable to think a woman like that would wield a sword. You can fight with magic and also wield a sword. He never says that when she fought if she fought with a sword or without one, but neither would be surprising and both fit her character at the time.

quote:

A character as important as Galadriel, were she to have worn armor in battle, it would be on display as a relic of note. That's how big a deal that would be.


You're asking to use Tolkien to clarify Tolkien but you're just making a random assumption as well. I %100 do not think that that would be the armor she would have used, but her using armor in battle doesn't take that big of a stretch of the imagination.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

The Fall of Gondolin is a good source.


Takes place during the first age when she wouldn’t have been famous, and is she even in it?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22771 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:


Yeah, people who know Tolkien's work are discussing things in a thread about a show based on Tolkien's work. Shocking, ain't it?

Very few people are getting their introduction to Tolkien in this show. Many have both read the books and saw the movies, most have at least seen the movies.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Tolkien said she was of the Amazon disposition
He clarified it to mean she was an athlete in the same sentence.

Amazonian disposition was his way of saying "tomboy"
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Tolkien said
quote:

fought fiercely as a warrior.
Where did he say this?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81739 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Takes place during the first age when she wouldn’t have been famous, and is she even in it?

Lots of armor descriptions, iirc.

Just first thing that popped in my head
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78150 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:11 pm to
Tolkien describes armor, but that’s different than Tolkien describing the armor of famous elves just out on display.

Also almost all armor is mail in the books.
This post was edited on 9/2/22 at 2:13 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40552 posts
Posted on 9/2/22 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Where did he say this?


Actually now looking it was just fought fiercely, not fiercely as a warrior.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram