Started By
Message

re: the ending of Shutter Island - discussion (SPOILERS)

Posted on 2/21/10 at 6:57 pm to
Posted by Babalugats
Middle Earth
Member since Jun 2009
3781 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 6:57 pm to
with every question someone asks about this movie, i have 20 more
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19141 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

1. Was Leo's "investigation" really taking place, with everyone around him just playing along to keep Leo sane or was all of this in his head? Because the lighthouse scene led into the scene in Leo's room and they were having the exact same discussion, which made me think everything was a fantasy world in Leo's mind. Think about it, was there REALLY someone hiding in the rocks?

The book led me to believe that some people/patients were involved with the "role playing since he was viewed as a master in escape, was a highly trained killer, and very intelligent. I do believe the lady in the cave was a delusion. Something in the book led me to believe he had possibly escaped many times before and they were having trouble containing him. That's how they knew in advance what he would do and how he would possibly react in certain situations. I need to read it again.

quote:

2. Did Leo escape from the prison prior to the beginning of the movie? Because I got the impression that he escaped and then they made up the Rachel-gone-missing story to bring him back to the prison since he thought he was a detective and then that's how they got him back on the island. Why else would they have been on the boat? Or again, was this all in his head?

The book definitely led me to believe this. Like I said, it's been a few years since I read the book.
DanMullen:
The movie was a very accurate portrayal of the book with the exception of a few details being left out. I'm sure book sales will climb as a result. I believe Andrew's delusions were at times mixed in with the "reality" of the situation.

Re: Dennis Lehane, he is one of my favorite authors. I've been looking forward to this movie and wasn't disappointed. Mystic River wasn't portrayed nearly as well as this one. I read Gone Baby Gone but haven't seen the movie. I did recently read Darkness, Take My Hand and A Drink Before The War. They both were excellent though Shutter Island so far, is my favorite.
This post was edited on 2/21/10 at 7:48 pm
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 9:53 pm to
I just got back from the theater.

All I can say has already been said:
quote:

Previews pretty much gave the movie away. The line "Who is patient number 67?" in the preview made the movie very predictable.

But, I will say it was still enjoyable and well done.


I loved the movie but I knew before I sat down that he was crazy the entire time because the trailer gave it away. I went in hoping for a twist on the trailer, but NO they had already given the twist away. I am fricking pissed off. Why would they make a trailer like that. This movie made me appreciate Nolan's new trailer for Inception because I am interested but have no idea what it is about, that's how a trailer should be. Movie is an 85/100 IMO.
Posted by As RXd
Member since Aug 2009
6011 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

2) After Leo leaves with the doctors for the Lobotomy. they show the lighthouse in the very next scene and the movie ends on that. Going through both scenes I thought he had excepted reality and didn't want to live with the memories. But when they show the lighthouse I thought they were insinuating that Leo was actually Teddy, he accepted he would never get off the island, and they took him to the lighthouse to do the lobotomy where all along Teddy thought they were doing experimental surgeries in there?


This is a very good point. Why show the lighthouse?

I left the movie so confused. I understood what all of you are saying, I was just looking for some deeper meaning. The movie's "twist" was just too easy to get. That's what got me the most.





Also, did anyone else think the "green" screens were way too obvious? Do you think that was done on purpose?
This post was edited on 2/21/10 at 10:50 pm
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20044 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

The movie's "twist" was just too easy to get.

The twist wasn't the point of the movie, that's why we were given so many hints throughout the movie.

Scorsese wanted to focus on Teddy Daniels, not the investigation.
This post was edited on 2/21/10 at 11:03 pm
Posted by lsunewcastle
BR
Member since Apr 2009
105 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 11:06 pm to
Saw this movie tonight. The more I think about it, the more I like it. I didn't see the "twist" coming, I just thought it was the Dr. trying to convince him that he was crazy. Now it makes sense.

As others have said, he was definitely finally cured and chose to get the lobotomy.

The fact that so many people are debating/talking about the meaning of the movie (to me) is the mark of a great film. I feel the same way about I Am Legend.

ETA: typo
This post was edited on 2/22/10 at 8:23 am
Posted by lsuclay
los angeles
Member since Sep 2009
1155 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 11:07 pm to
I thought it was extremely confusing. one of those movies you really have to think about and maybe see again.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20044 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 11:11 pm to
My thoughts going into the movie were this:

-Leo arrives to investigate Rachel's disappearance

-The investigation is fake/a set up

-Somehow they make Leo go crazy

-Leo ends up as a mental patient


Boy was I way off, lol....but I'm glad because I LOVED everything about this movie!
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 2/21/10 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Did Leo escape from the prison prior to the beginning of the movie? Because I got the impression that he escaped and then they made up the Rachel-gone-missing story to bring him back to the prison since he thought he was a detective and then that's how they got him back on the island. Why else would they have been on the boat? Or again, was this all in his head?


The book definitely led me to believe this. Like I said, it's been a few years since I read the book.
DanMullen:
The movie was a very accurate portrayal of the book with the exception of a few details being left out. I'm sure book sales will climb as a result. I believe Andrew's delusions were at times mixed in with the "reality" of the situation.



haven't seen the movie yet but I have read the book. From what I remember, no he didn't escape. They did everything in order to try to get him to see the real world instead of the fantasy world he was living in.
Posted by ISDSTiger
Member since Sep 2006
5071 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 12:13 am to
quote:

The twist wasn't the point of the movie, that's why we were given so many hints throughout the movie. Scorsese wanted to focus on Teddy Daniels, not the investigation.


exactly. people think they're einstein around here because they "cracked the code."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477166 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 7:28 am to
quote:

The fact that so many people are debating/talking about the meaning of the movie (to me) is the mark of a great film

wooow

the discussion about this movie isn't that deep

this was far from a great film

quote:

I feel the same way about I Am Legend.

oh

i should have waited until the end of your comment
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19141 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:10 am to
quote:

haven't seen the movie yet but I have read the book. From what I remember, no he didn't escape. They did everything in order to try to get him to see the real world instead of the fantasy world he was living in.

He didn't escape the prison in the sense of not being under their observation, though they had not been able to contain and confine him within a cell, etc. on the island. They knew how creative and dangerous he could be. I thought I remembered something in the book alluding to this.


This post was edited on 2/22/10 at 8:16 am
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86218 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:15 am to
quote:

it is my understanding that when he said... "is it better to die a good man than to live as a monster" or whatever.... that he was aware of who he was and what he had done, but chose to have the lobotomy. is this what we are meant to think?


This is what I took from it as well, and thought it was pretty obvious, but after reading this thread, I guess it wasn't so obvious...
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86218 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:17 am to
quote:

this was far from a great film


Have you actually seen it yet, or are you basing your criticism off of what you read off other message boards again?
Posted by dutchdanish
Reno
Member since Aug 2008
2769 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:24 am to
Watched this a second time last night and it was a totally different movie knowing what I know now. Teddy's "partner" did a great job of acting in this movie. Every line makes complete sense now from the security officer beginning it with "we're all on edge right now." I highly recommend watching it a second time. It's like a totally different movie.
Posted by As RXd
Member since Aug 2009
6011 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Watched this a second time last night and it was a totally different movie knowing what I know now. Teddy's "partner" did a great job of acting in this movie. Every line makes complete sense now from the security officer beginning it with "we're all on edge right now." I highly recommend watching it a second time. It's like a totally different movie.


Wow. I didn't even think about that.
Posted by As RXd
Member since Aug 2009
6011 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Watched this a second time last night and it was a totally different movie knowing what I know now. Teddy's "partner" did a great job of acting in this movie. Every line makes complete sense now from the security officer beginning it with "we're all on edge right now." I highly recommend watching it a second time. It's like a totally different movie.


Wow. I didn't even think about that.

What about when he was interviewing the patients? They seemed like they were coached. It would be worth a second watch.
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19141 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 8:33 am to
quote:

exactly. people think they're einstein around here because they "cracked the code."


Who's claiming to be a cracker of any sort?
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108348 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Have you actually seen it yet, or are you basing your criticism off of what you read off other message boards again?


Brah, you should know by now, slow made up his mind he didn't like it during pre-production. This is his M.O. He doesn't even like himself. dude is suffering from a bad child hood and he likes to take it out on stuff other people happen to like.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477166 posts
Posted on 2/22/10 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Have you actually seen it yet,

saw it saturday at 1:15pm
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram