- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The DC Studios series Lanterns premieres today, August 16, 2026, at 9:00 p.e. ET.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:09 am to imjustafatkid
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:09 am to imjustafatkid
Literally 4 posts above 
quote:
it will not be a good Green Lantern show.
1
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:10 am to Broski
quote:
Literally 4 posts above
That doesn't mean what you want it to mean.
quote:
If they go the route you guys suggest, it will not be a good Green Lantern show. They haven't done that yet.
Can you find any posts where I said I don't like this show?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:12 am to imjustafatkid
Anyone can read this thread and see that you don't like this show even if you didn't explicitly say "I don't like this show"
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:13 am to Broski
quote:
Anyone can read this thread and see that you don't like this show even if you didn't explicitly say "I don't like this show"
Nope, they can't.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:13 am to Broski
So far, its not good, but its not overly horrible. Its just a big slow and characters do dumb things.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:14 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Nope, they can't.
You don't get to decide what a jury thinks
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 am to FreddieMac
quote:
So far, its not good, but its not overly horrible. Its just a big slow and characters do dumb things.
I liked the first episode till the final scene, but it was pretty obvious that was coming based on the trailers. Second episode was just bad and completely skippable. Folks itt don't like it being pointed out that nothing happened in the second episode.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:17 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 am to Broski
quote:
You don't get to decide what a jury thinks
It's fun to watch you give up over multiple posts. By all means, please continue.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Anyone can read this thread and see that you don't like this show even if you didn't explicitly say "I don't like this show"
Nope, they can't.
Dude you've been dogging episode two for 10 pages straight now.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:27 am to Broski
quote:
You're on truth social, aren't you?
Well he did say that the Daily Wite+ was a better streaming service than Apple+ and that Apple+ would go under and that shows on there are relegated from other streaming services, Yea, safe to say he's on truth social.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:31 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Well he did say that the Daily Wite+ was a better streaming service than Apple+ and that Apple+ would go under and that shows on there are relegated from other streaming services, Yea, safe to say he's on truth social.
Never said this. I said everything Daily Wire puts out is great, which is true. I also said Apple+ will be shut down if it keeps losing so much money, which is also true. The best strategy for Apple+ is to just hold out for when that happens and watch the catalogue on whatever service they sell all their content to.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:32 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:33 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Dude you've been dogging episode two for 10 pages straight now.
This isn't true. There's nothing to dog about episode 2. They simply didn't show anything at all. Anyone honest with themselves could admit that they would easily go from episode 1 to episode 3 without missing anything.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:35 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's fun to watch you give up over multiple posts. By all means, please continue.
This is a peak Madking gaslighting attempt
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:35 am to travelgamer
The second episode gave us a little more training between Hal and John, but it was damned unsatisfying. "Just fly"...? 
And then we have the issue with the ring running out of juice but John's bird remained. That seems to be a change from lore where the ring maintained the construct (thus if it lost charge, the construct vanished). It was an interesting vehicle to show John's concentration, but not sure I like that expansion of the ring's ability (seems a bit OP for me).
Hal's character seems to bounce back and forth between being a brilliant detective and being just a lucky, bumbling a-hole. It's such a wide gulf between the two that it's a bit jarring as you don't know which Hal you are going to get from scene to scene (the bodies in the detector versus the town hall meeting, for example). It feels like they are trying to make him into a bit of a Space Columbo but have taken it a bit too far.
Still watching and still enjoying, but there are some definite cracks in the writing.
And then we have the issue with the ring running out of juice but John's bird remained. That seems to be a change from lore where the ring maintained the construct (thus if it lost charge, the construct vanished). It was an interesting vehicle to show John's concentration, but not sure I like that expansion of the ring's ability (seems a bit OP for me).
Hal's character seems to bounce back and forth between being a brilliant detective and being just a lucky, bumbling a-hole. It's such a wide gulf between the two that it's a bit jarring as you don't know which Hal you are going to get from scene to scene (the bodies in the detector versus the town hall meeting, for example). It feels like they are trying to make him into a bit of a Space Columbo but have taken it a bit too far.
Still watching and still enjoying, but there are some definite cracks in the writing.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
I said everything Daily Wire puts out is great, which is true.
You may need a crash course on what the word "true" means
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:39 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Never said this
Yes you did. One of your big things was laughing at Masters of Air being on Apple because it asn't good enough for HBO so it was relegated to Apple. Even when I showed you the showrunners turned down HBO's ofer. ANd at the same time Martin Scorcese was making a best picture winner on Apple. So i guess guys like Scorsese are relegated to Apple too
quote:
he best strategy for Apple+ is to just hold out for when that happens and watch the catalogue on whatever service they sell all their content to.
So like I said, you said it was going under. Congrats on never getting to watch any Apple shows. What a great strategy! Losing a billion a year is nothing to a company that makes 100 billion in net profit a year.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:41 am to Bard
quote:
And then we have the issue with the ring running out of juice but John's bird remained. That seems to be a change from lore where the ring maintained the construct (thus if it lost charge, the construct vanished). It was an interesting vehicle to show John's concentration, but not sure I like that expansion of the ring's ability (seems a bit OP for me).
It's a really head-scratching scenario that contradicts the foundation they should be laying with Green Lantern and how they work. No ring, no power is a pretty central theme to how those characters work. I'm not sure how they're going to reconcile that.
quote:
Hal's character seems to bounce back and forth between being a brilliant detective and being just a lucky, bumbling a-hole. It's such a wide gulf between the two that it's a bit jarring as you don't know which Hal you are going to get from scene to scene (the bodies in the detector versus the town hall meeting, for example). It feels like they are trying to make him into a bit of a Space Columbo but have taken it a bit too far.
It definitely doesn't feel like Hal Jordan. Sometimes he acts more like I would expect Guy Gardner to act.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:42 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:44 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Yes you did. One of your big things was laughing at Masters of Air being on Apple because it asn't good enough for HBO so it was relegated to Apple.
No, I said being put on Apple+ is like being relegated. Not because Apple+ is bad. Because Apple+ isn't popular. You imagined more into my statement than was there.
quote:
So like I said, you said it was going under. Congrats on never getting to watch any Apple shows. What a great strategy! Losing a billion a year is nothing to a company that makes 100 billion in net profit a year.
I'm not exactly going out on a limb here. Billion dollar companies didn't get there by forever carrying segments that churn out billion-dollar losses.
I've lost out on nothing by waiting them out.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:46 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:45 am to Broski
quote:
You may need a crash course on what the word "true" means
Nope, everything they've released so far is objectively good. I'm sure you've watched none of it, so you wouldn't know.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:47 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Nope, everything they've released so far is objectively good.
Objectively he says
Page 20 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News