
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The BBC learned an important lesson from Doctor Who
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:05 pm
Hold up; no, they did not.
After pile-driving the show into cancellation with bad writing and general phaggotry, they're trying to shop it around to external studios. But wait, they have a list of demands:
quote:
The tender also sets out diversity and access requirements for the new production. The BBC expects production teams to meet a 25% diversity requirement, while bidders must show how they will recruit, develop and retain deaf, disabled and neurodivergent talent both on and off screen. The award criteria also asks producers to consider on-screen diversity and representation across the UK.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-tender-opened-107387.htm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:16 pm to Flats
quote:
The tender also sets out diversity and access requirements for the new production. The BBC expects production teams to meet a 25% diversity requirement, while bidders must show how they will recruit, develop and retain deaf, disabled and neurodivergent talent both on and off screen. The award criteria also asks producers to consider on-screen diversity and representation across the UK.

Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:24 pm to Flats
quote:
deaf, disabled and neurodivergent
So they need to find a deaf paralytic autist.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:36 pm to Flats
racial quota representation is what hollywood has been doing. that's why you see so much forced diversity in tv/movies in every show now.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:50 pm to Boodis Man

This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:53 pm to Flats
Wonder how many "diverse" people are running the BBC?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:05 pm to PuertoRicanBlaze
quote:I googled "BBC" and it looks like a bunch of large, fit, shirtless black guys.
Wonder how many "diverse" people are running the BBC?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:14 pm to Flats
We ruined this and lost money so pay us and obey our quotas so you too can lose money. LOL. The arrogance is actually funny.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:22 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
racial quota representation is what hollywood has been doing. that's why you see so much forced diversity in tv/movies in every show now.
quote:
To be eligible for a Best Picture nomination at the Academy Awards, films must meet at least two out of four representation and inclusion standards.
The Four Standards Overview
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences established these guidelines to encourage equitable hiring and inclusive storytelling. A film only needs to satisfy two of the following four categories:
Standard A: On-Screen Representation, Themes, and NarrativesStandard
B: Creative Leadership and Project TeamStandard
C: Industry Access and OpportunitiesStandard
D: Audience Development
Standard A: On-Screen RepresentationFilms must fulfill at least one criterion involving a lead/significant supporting actor from an underrepresented racial/ethnic group, an ensemble cast with at least 30% representation from underrepresented groups, or a central storyline focused on an underrepresented group
Standard B: Creative Leadership & Crew
Productions must meet behind-the-scenes thresholds by appointing at least two individuals from underrepresented groups to key leadership/department head roles (including at least one from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group) and ensuring crew diversity of at least 30% or including other underrepresented racial/ethnic crew members.
Standards C & D: Access and Audience
Standard C (Industry Access): Requires production companies to provide paid internships, apprenticeships, or skill-development and training opportunities for underrepresented groups.
Standard D (Audience Development): Requires studios or film companies to maintain multi-cultural representation within their senior marketing, distribution, and publicity leadership teams.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:22 pm to Flats
quote:
BBC learned an important lesson
In other BBC news
They removed quite a few shows/sketches from Mitchell & Webb today that they deemed offensive and doesn't work today
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:12 pm to Flats
This is why every Hollywood movie these days costs hundreds of millions of dollars to produce. They have to hire 3 times the number of people to do the job because 2/3 of them are quota hires that contribute nothing.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:34 pm to Flats
Imagine being the lug nut who got a show that’s been on the air since the 60s and almost 1000 episodes canceled
How do you get Dr. Who to that point?
How do you get Dr. Who to that point?
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:53 pm to Flats
The BBC is in a position to demand nothing. Networks, on the other hand, are in a position to GRANT nothing.


Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:23 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
Imagine being the lug nut who got a show that’s been on the air since the 60s and almost 1000 episodes canceled
The tendering process means it is not canceled.
The show is in hiatus, as it has gone through before. It has been canceled before. Twice. It was canceled in 1989, and then the plans to move the 1996 revival to series were canceled after the TV movie failed. The idea of Doctor Who as some beacon of tv stability and success is a fiction. It has a long history of barely surviving and fighting budget cuts
They tried to go back to the well with RTD, and it didn't work to bring in new fans. Most importantly, they tried to bring in money with Disney without considering how disney would keep them on a restrictive leash without making the show any kind of marketing priority.
After a bad run and then a disappointing run, letting the show reset and shopping new creatives is probably the right idea.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:27 pm to Jay Are
quote:
It was canceled in 1989
I always thought that particular run just ended as decided by the production team with a final episode/wrap up and wasn’t necessarily “cancellation?”
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:29 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
I googled "BBC" and it looks like a bunch of large, fit, shirtless black guys.
Why is it asking me to confirm my age?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:52 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
How do you get Dr. Who to that point?

Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:17 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
googled "BBC" and it looks like a bunch of large, fit, shirtless black guys.
Why is it asking me to confirm my age?
Are you watching the Lanterns show?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:48 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
quote:Nicholas Meyer stole it from this 1949 film, which happens to be my favorite movie of all time:
First Print Reference: The earliest recorded food metaphor for revenge appears in the 1846 English translation of Eugène Sue’s French novel Mathilde, where it was written as "revenge is very good eaten cold".
Popular Culture: The exact modern phrasing was popularized by the 1982 film [Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan](wikipedia.org_ Trek_II:_The_Wrath_of_Khan) (falsely attributed as a Klingon proverb) and later used in films like Kill Bill. Earlier variations also appeared in Mario Puzo's novel The Godfather.

quote:
"Time had brought me revenge on Lionel, and as the Italian proverb says, revenge is a dish which people of taste prefer to eat cold."
Posted on 9/22/26 at 5:43 am to Zap Rowsdower
It was cancelled. Low ratings and the head of the BBC at the time hated it. Or I should say the heads of the BBC clashed often with the showrunner John Nathan Turner.
It was officially rested but that was the polite way of saying it isn't on the schedule and it won't be on the schedule in the future. Thus cancelled. They didn't want fan backlash like they had with the previous resting.
They kept chopping the budget for higher rated series and it showed. I wasn't super sad when it was cancelled because the show was too expensive for WYES and they had removed it from the regular schedule.
This time I clap with glee for the end of the show. They destroyed the legacy with all of their woke antics which seemed to get worse and worse each year going as far as retconning the original doctor. I hope the writers and anyone involved never work again. I actually wish ill will on them. Arrogant fricks who disrespected 60 years of history to push their politics.
It was officially rested but that was the polite way of saying it isn't on the schedule and it won't be on the schedule in the future. Thus cancelled. They didn't want fan backlash like they had with the previous resting.
They kept chopping the budget for higher rated series and it showed. I wasn't super sad when it was cancelled because the show was too expensive for WYES and they had removed it from the regular schedule.
This time I clap with glee for the end of the show. They destroyed the legacy with all of their woke antics which seemed to get worse and worse each year going as far as retconning the original doctor. I hope the writers and anyone involved never work again. I actually wish ill will on them. Arrogant fricks who disrespected 60 years of history to push their politics.
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 7:20 am

Popular
Back to top


11


.jpg)












