- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tatiana explains why She-Hulk was cut from Wolverine & Deadpool. Ryan Reynolds RULES!!!
Posted on 10/30/24 at 4:45 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 10/30/24 at 4:45 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
But you are delusional, if you think Ragnarok was better than the original Thor.
This is a bad take. The first Thor was really good, but Ragnarok was a blast. Love and Thunder sucked balls, but I can see how they learned the wrong lessons with Ragnarok and leaned way too hard into the silliness. Taika Waititi was high on his own supply and is not nearly as funny as he thinks he is.
0
Posted on 10/30/24 at 6:04 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:I guess I am delusional.
But you are delusional, if you think Ragnarok was better than the original Thor.
Ragnarok was great, a far better movie than Thor. . .but it can't be undersold that this directly led to the parody that the MCU became
And though Thor was a better take on the character than Ragnarok (by a million miles), Thor was a much worse movie
Posted on 10/30/24 at 6:28 pm to Roaad
...another vote for Ragnarok. That movie was fun and hilarious.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 6:35 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
That movie was fun and hilarious.
Doesn't make it a BETTER movie though.
I'll die on this hill.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:00 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:It was a far better movie. The action, pacing, and dialogue were way better
Doesn't make it a BETTER movie though.
I do note that the take on the Thor character was irreparably damaged by the portrayal in Ragnarok. But the movie itself was far better.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:08 pm to dcw7g
quote:
Don't be a sucker for rage bait like this.
These days if people did that it would kill like 75% of the posts on this board.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:13 pm to Dr RC
The people who believe the quote verbatim are dumb.
The people who think they are the only person who know she is being sarcastic. . .not just dumb, but arrogant in their ignorance
The people who think they are the only person who know she is being sarcastic. . .not just dumb, but arrogant in their ignorance
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:15 pm to Roaad
Thor was Shakespeare & Ragnarok was … idk, Dumb & Dumber?
Both can be really good but for different reasons.
But Thor was a better overall story. No contest.
Both can be really good but for different reasons.
But Thor was a better overall story. No contest.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:17 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
The stories were a push, at best
Ragnarok had a better supporting cast, better dialogue, better sets, a FAAAR better villain.
Thor had a more accurate Thor
Ragnarok had a better supporting cast, better dialogue, better sets, a FAAAR better villain.
Thor had a more accurate Thor
Posted on 10/30/24 at 11:33 pm to Roaad
quote:Umm, Thor's supporting cast had Anthony Hopkins, Idris Elba, Stellan Skarsgard, Rene Russo and Ray Stevenson in it. It wasn't just Kat Dennings capitalizing on her 15 minutes of fame.
Ragnarok had a better supporting cast
quote:Different dialog, can't say one is truly better.
better dialogue
quote:Well, you have Thor with Asgard, and a New Mexico desert town. Ragnarok has some NY, Asgard, and a dayglo trash heap planet. Ragnarok was more psychedelic looking, I'll give you that.
better sets
quote:You do realize Thor's villain was Loki, right?
a FAAAR better villain
I enjoyed both movies. I'd say the biggest drawback to Thor was the bleached eyebrows
Posted on 10/30/24 at 11:48 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
She-Hulk isn't the worst possible concept. You just need talented writers.
And she needs to be attractive when she isn't angry.
Lots of flaws in their approach:
1. Not giving it enough time and budget for the amount of CGI (her CGI model was not great)
2. She-Hulk's 4th wall breaking can be pretty amusing in the comics, but it fell flat in this.
3. Jennifer Walters is legitimately attractive in both forms, canonically. Even if you find Tatiana attractive, they went out of their way to make her as bland as possible (of which Jennifer Walters is NOT).
4. Last, but not least, only the most hardcore MCU Fans were going to watch the D+ shows - and that means the same fans that actually know Bruce's tragic backstory. Jen shitting all over it did absolutely nothing to endear fans to her.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 4:35 am to Scoob
quote:Ragnarok had Elba, Hopkins, Cate Blanchett, Ray Stevenson, Jeff Goldblum, Karl Urban, and Ruffalo
Thor's supporting cast had Anthony Hopkins, Idris Elba, Stellan Skarsgard, Rene Russo and Ray Stevenson
quote:
Different dialog, can't say one is truly better.
quote:
Well, you have Thor with Asgard, and a New Mexico desert town
vs Asgard, Sakaar, New Asgard
quote:Ultimately, sure. But the actual screen villain was the Doom Armor.
You do realize Thor's villain was Loki, right?
Even using Loki. Loki literally has to band together with Thor to beat this villain.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 12:59 pm to Roaad
quote:
Thor had a more accurate Thor
I rest my case.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 1:29 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
She literally said all this sarcastically for idiots like you to believe it.
You took the bait hahhaa
She is joking about the wishing she didn’t push feminist and woke agenda and about lawsuit. It obvious that she likes to push woke agenda. I not sure how her push for child trannies truly meshes with feminism. The trans agenda keeps trying to go after Rowling, but Tatiana and other leftists believe they fit together and that Rowling is a phobic.
It does seem like her and Captain Marvel’s scenes got cut out, and it’s likely that the way they portray them didn’t fit with Reynold’s vision for the movie along with the forced storyline to get them in it. She is just exaggerating what has been rumored and also specifically pointing it at herself instead of her she-hulk character for effect to limit getting cut out.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 1:42 pm to dallastigers
quote:
It does seem like her and Captain Marvel’s scenes got cut out
Based off what? Where has it ever been confirmed they even shot scenes for the Deadpool & Wolverine?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 1:44 pm to skrayper
quote:
Even if you find Tatiana attractive
She was in that show where she plays multiple clones. Some might be that her main clone character early on used sex to distract the guy from noticing she was different. She rode him on a kitchen island counter top while placing his hand where she wanted like if she was going to screw a stranger she just met she was going to make sure she enjoyed it. Afterwards you got a look at her legs and butt from being a dancer. Then through out the show you get to see multiple different versions with differing looks and personalities which helped as well. Allison could get intense with sex? (I think the name was Allison).
Not sure how she looked as either form of the she-hulk character.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 1:45 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
The Thor portrayL is the only pro in the Thor 1 column. When comparing the 2.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 2:04 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
I'm just wondering if there's anything you guys won't cry about
More keyboard bad arse talk from “For the kingdom of God is not a matter of talk but of power”.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 2:23 pm to dallastigers
are you denying that there is a never-ending flood of threads on this board bitching about wokeism?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 4:40 pm to dallastigers
quote:
She is joking about the wishing she didn’t push feminist and woke agenda and about lawsuit.
Is everyone here truly this Comedy Bang Bang-illiterate?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News