Started By
Message

re: 'Supergirl' Discussion Thread: News, Box Office, RT. Spoilers Allowed. WW $68 mil OW

Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
13125 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Batman

I don’t see WB doing two Batman films, especially since Reeves’ Batman made money.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85250 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:23 pm to
Deadline says it is tracking to lose $125 million, Variety says at least $100 million

How ‘Supergirl’ Ran Into Kryptonite At The Box Office: Superman’s Cousin To Lose $125M

quote:

So they took a swing on Tom King and Bilquis Evely’s visceral and edgy graphic novel Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, which fans consider a True Grit-type story in the Krypton sub-verse. It has cost Gunn and Safran’s DC dearly; industry sources are estimating a $125 million loss after a $68M worldwide and $37M domestic opening and all first-cycle downstream ancillaries. Warner Bros sources have told us that breakeven for the Craig Gillespie-directed space opera resides in the $315M global range after a reported $170M-$186M net production cost and $120M global P&A (that doesn’t include the DC-record $100M promotional partner campaign).


‘Supergirl’ Braces for $100 Million Loss: What DC Studios Should Learn From Its Box Office Bomb

quote:

In “Supergirl,” a melodramatic cover of Jimmy Eat World’s “The Middle” scores a climactic battle sequence, with the song’s lyrics meant to offer encouragement to the plucky heroine: “Hey, don’t write yourself off yet…”

Yet the initial box office results for “Supergirl” would suggest that audiences are, in fact, writing off the film — and continuing to reject lesser-known comic book protagonists. The Warner Bros. and DC Studios adaptation, which centers on Superman’s cousin Kara Zor-El, misfired with $37.1 million in North America and $62.6 million globally in its opening weekend. Monday’s final tally was below Sunday’s estimate of $38 million domestically and $68 million worldwide. After launching below expectations, the big-budget film is shaping up to be a money loser for the studio, as well as a major setback for the newly rebooted DC Universe.

Warner Bros. and DC spent $170 million to produce and roughly $120 million to market the comic book adventure, which takes place in outer space as Supergirl and an alien girl named Ruthye embark on a quest for vengeance and justice. Those lackluster initial ticket sales are concerning because “Supergirl” hasn’t been widely embraced by the general public, and there’s intense competition during the height of summer movie season, which could hobble the film’s box office staying power. Next weekend sees the release of another family-friendly film, Universal’s animated “Minions & Monsters,” while Disney’s live-action “Moana,” Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” and Sony’s “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” round out the month of July.

“This was always going to be a tough hurdle for DC and Warner Bros. because Supergirl isn’t a character that has ever created an event-level blockbuster,” says analyst Jeff Bock of Exhibitor Relations. “Audience perception of ‘Supergirl’ was not good. This is just a case of the film wasn’t good enough to become an event.”

Traditionally, a movie on the scale of “Supergirl” would need to earn at least $375 million to break even because theater owners get to keep about half of box office returns. However, a source close to “Supergirl” puts the film’s breakeven number at closer to $300 million.
Variety doesn't count the P&L
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 7:24 pm
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
77718 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:24 pm to
Shocker. Because Supergirl was a side character who was never intended to have her own show.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49020 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:25 pm to

The Chuds win again!

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85250 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:38 pm to
Not a fan of the guy, but this hit my Twitter feed:

Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:44 pm to
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6724 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:46 pm to
Please keep James away from Batman. Gunn to his head.

Hopefully this supergirl flop doesn’t scare WB from one day making Batman family spin offs.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:47 pm to
I wonder if there would be pop/punk needle drops in a James Gunn-led DCU Batman movie
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49020 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:00 pm to
People need to understand, that's not photoshopped. Those are legit headlines by the same author, magazine, and very real headlines, just weeks apart.

Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38828 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

People need to understand, that's not photoshopped. Those are legit headlines by the same author, magazine, and very real headlines, just weeks apart.


And it's other people who are obsessed, or take politics too far, etc.

Clown world.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:06 pm to
I was thinking that was just a meme
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163057 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:07 pm to
I don’t really understand the thought process of investing so heavily in super girl when you’re EU is on shaky ground as it is

Take that gamble when you have some hits under your belt and people have full buy in.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85250 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:13 pm to
Here is a good headline from Vogue:

quote:

Who Wants to Stream Shows About Straight White Men? Everyone, Apparently


LINK

quote:

We’re staring down the barrel of 2025, a year that was supposed to usher in record diversity onscreen (and, ideally, in real life), yet a recent UCLA report found that white men continue to dominate the most-watched streaming shows, such as Suits and Blue Bloods. This might seem anachronistic. After all, those guys had their say back in the earliest days of cinema, theoretically making this the era of BIPOC and otherwise marginalized creators like Shonda Rhimes, Tanya Saracho, Mindy Kaling, Michaela Jaé Rodriguez, and Jaclyn Moore. But in the era of Trump 2.0, viewers are making a beeline for “second-screen content” that offers the least possible stimulation and capitulates almost entirely to the status quo.

Obviously, it doesn’t have to be that deep. (Some people just like Suits! Not me, but some people!) But it’s difficult not to link this trend to Hollywood’s decline in LGBTQ+ representation since the COVID pandemic and the WGA and SAG strikes of 2023. Diversity within the industry is, in fact, declining in general. While the percentage of Asian actors with speaking roles in films skyrocketed in 2023, Black and Latinx actors did not see the same increase, and it’s no secret that most Hollywood writers’ rooms remain very white, very male, very cis, and very straight.


When queer, racially and ethnically varied, and female-centric shows like Amazon’s A League of Their Own are unceremoniously canceled (a decision that creator Abbi Jacobson called “bullshite and cowardly”), allegedly because focus groups were uncomfortable with its strong LGBTQ+ focus, it’s difficult not to wonder whether various streaming platforms’ search for a signature, audience-pleasing-but-roundly-inoffensive breakout hit is getting in the way of telling stories with an actual viewpoint that might reach a new and less frequently represented segment of the American population. You can’t legislate taste or compel people to watch any particular show, but if we keep serving up Suits binge-watch sessions to viewers while cutting down on series with diverse leads, is it any wonder that people’s tastes will become more and more geared toward the palatable, the bland, and the depressingly familiar?



This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:27 pm to
I despise these people

quote:

don’t really understand the thought process of investing so heavily in super girl when you’re EU is on shaky ground as it is Take that gamble when you have some hits under your belt and people have full buy in.

Exactly, you have to develop your Batman, Wonder Woman, and Green Lantern so we can get into some space stories eventually imo.

They’ve fricked around for FOUR YEARS and we have one forgettable Superman movie, albeit a good actor in the role, and a bad Supergirl movie. That is fricking it

Not only that, but Gunn wanted to develop “The Authority”, Teen Titans and a Bane/Deathstroke movie before any of the primary characters.

they’ve wasted years of Marvel being mediocre when they could’ve been grabbing market share
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 8:44 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85250 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:31 pm to
It literally says straight white men are back

Just that they are pretty salty about it
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:34 pm to
I know, I read the whole thing. I can never understand their thinking being entirely wrapped up in “representation” and not on merit
Posted by SOBmustpay
North Louisiana
Member since Jun 2026
230 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:34 pm to
Good Lord
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60870 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

They’ve fricked around for FOUR YEARS and we have one forgettable Superman movie, albeit a good actor in the role, and a bad Supergirl movie. That is fricking it



TBF, there was a very long strike that backed things up for the entire industry. Otherwise, we might be getting MOT and The Batman 2 this year instead of next
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67331 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Who Wants to Stream Shows About Straight White Men? Everyone, Apparently


Nah, we want hot chicks too.

Who don't act like men.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

there was a very long strike that backed things up for the entire industry. Otherwise, we might be getting MOT and The Batman 2 this year instead of next

That’s true but we also had to wait an extra year for him to finish GOTG
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29 30 ... 37
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 37Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram