- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Sound of Freedom' scores 92% Rotten Tomatoes rating ahead of July 4 premiere
Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:20 pm to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:20 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Correct. It’s an underfunded system when it comes to agencies that help with homeless youth programs, CHFS/CPS (where a lot of these kids fall through LARGE cracks), and a shrinking pool of private orgnanizations (like faith-based) who used to be able to pick up the slack.
And to make it even harder, most of these teens will not be trusting at all of anyone trying to help them, because they've already experienced many kinds of abuse from previous people who were supposed to help them. Therefore, these teens tend to take whatever stuff they can get (food, clothes, money) and run again because they feel safer on the street with another similar teen than with anyone trying to help.
0
Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:44 pm to Jay Are
quote:
This seems like a dumb argument you guys are having.
Not me. I specifically am commenting on their lack of comments about the actual movie, which this thread (on the M/TV board) is supposed to be about.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The actual movie product is likely bad.
Not a comment on the movie.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
The only reason you have to ask is because you’re trying to twist what I said which was a quote from you ergo you’re twisting your own words to deflect from what you said previously. My point stands, you’re completely dishonest and your comments are politically motivated.
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:13 pm to Madking
SFP has the integrity of a middle eastern bazaar owner. Too intellectually dishonest. Not surprising since he’s a lawyer, after all. Dude argues for a living.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:14 pm to Artificial Intel
Hopefully he works for a big paper firm because his arguments are always shite.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:17 pm to Madking
quote:
The only reason you have to ask is because you’re trying to twist what I said
No your comment doesn't make sense using idols or ideals.
quote:
My point stands, you’re completely dishonest
Wrong
quote:
and your comments are politically motivated.
Super wrong (unless you're referencing HT replacing the WOD)
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:19 pm to Madking
quote:
Hopefully he works for a big paper firm because his arguments are always shite.
The last time I appealed a trial court that ruled against me, I won on appeal (which is not easy). Had the LASC taken the case, it would have set precedent (in my favor)
But I don't do much arguing in my day to day job. I'm much more of a nanny, cat herder, and negotiator.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
Crawfishing isn’t a legitimate debating tactic.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:20 pm to blueboy
Me agreeing with you isn't making a comment about the movie.
It's making a comment about why I'm not going to see it in theaters. There's a huge rhetorical distinction.
It's making a comment about why I'm not going to see it in theaters. There's a huge rhetorical distinction.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:21 pm to Madking
quote:
Crawfishing isn’t a legitimate debating tactic.
Crawfishing? Do you know what that word means?
Again: political idols or ideals?
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Like I said, you drown people in paper.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
Your stance was that this topic is a right wing fantasy that doesn’t exist and you also said the people who take it seriously only do so because of their political beliefs. None of that is true, you injected the politics into this thread to defend your political “idols” because you believe this problem reflects on them in a poor way. I couldn’t have been more clear and neither could you so crawfishing and spinning now won’t do you any good.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:26 pm to Madking
quote:
Like I said, you drown people in paper.
No
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:31 pm to Madking
quote:
Your stance was that this topic is a right wing fantasy
No. The right wing has developed a fantasy mythos around this. Huge difference.
quote:
that doesn’t exist
I never said that.
quote:
you also said the people who take it seriously only do so because of their political beliefs.
Quote me saying this.
quote:
your political “idols”
I have none.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not gonna argue with a dishonest person.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:52 pm to Madking
quote:
Not gonna argue with a dishonest person.
Still relying on that strawman?
A white flag would be more effective.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 5:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Again I quoted you so what you’re saying is you’re using a straw man.
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:26 pm to Madking
I encourage everyone to go and see this film.
Shining a light on this is a positive. Despite the
curious protestations of some of our posters.
Child trafficking is bad. I shouldn’t have to say that.
Shining a light on this is a positive. Despite the
curious protestations of some of our posters.
Child trafficking is bad. I shouldn’t have to say that.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:38 pm to Madking
quote:
Again I quoted you
Which quote, specifically?
Are you talking about three words (“preconceived political beliefs “) ?
And you extrapolated all of your rambling from those 3 words?
Page 9 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News