Started By
Message

re: Official Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II Reaction Thread

Posted on 7/18/11 at 7:23 pm to
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79132 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 7:23 pm to
Not sure who said it was the "wanting HP to win" scenario. That certainly was never the case.

And I guess it was a risk, yes. She probably assumed that if he was feigning death on the ground there, he wasn't going to reveal himself until he needed to. Again, a guess.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37009 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

Not sure who said it was the "wanting HP to win" scenario. That certainly was never the case.


that was a sidebar speculation on teh part of OMLandshark - offered us as another possible explanation for her behavior

quote:


And I guess it was a risk, yes. She probably assumed that if he was feigning death on the ground there, he wasn't going to reveal himself until he needed to. Again, a guess.


thank you

it was a risk

I obviously like the movie overall - just had some problems with certain devices they used to move the characters from place to place

and i don't have a problem with the way they changed V's death to be more interesting for the big screen - it played better on the big screen than the book version

neither do I have a problem with the ending for the movie with the flash forward to kids going to Hogwarts - at least it wasn't as extended as happy hobbits LOLing on NO2 for 10 minutes

Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79132 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 7:32 pm to
I think I posted this earlier, but I didn't mind the extended duel at the end. But it was almost like the rest of the school had no clue that Voldemort was dead. Really no excitement at all.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

but as just pointed out (a couple posts above) she wasn't wagering on anyone - she was neutral to teh outcome of who won at this point and just wanted to stay alive as long as possible... making any lie/risk she took an irrational risk



At that point she certainly wasn't neutral who she wanted to win. If Voldemort won, then they would all be killed.

And saying he's alive offered no good outcomes really. Lying and saying he was dead while risky, certainly provided the best outcome. You refuse to acknowledge that they felt they were marked for slaughter. Whats a few hours compared to 5 years tops? She and the rest of her family felt they didn't have much longer to live anyway.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

I don't understand

Draco's mother deliberately did not hand over HP when that opportunity presented itself

It's really quite simple: mothers love their sons. Forced to choose between Draco and Voldemort, Narcissa chooses her son. I don't see what is so hard to understand about her choice, and in a way, it is the Malfoys' redemption.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33841 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 8:21 pm to
Just saw it. As someone who has never read any of the books, I'll have to judge it strictly on the merits of what I just saw as it stands as a movie

I really liked the first 90% of the movie, I thought it was really well done, I could sense myself really getting into the movie, more than the previous ones

Then, the last 15 minutes.....it wasnt bad perse, but it really seemed like they mailed it in, it just fell apart. And as far as the epilogue goes, I thought it was fine, except they really should have gone ahead and cast older actors, it would not have in any way taken away from the moment.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37009 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 8:23 pm to
i'm not sure where to begin with that response since it completely misses the point i was driving at
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:11 pm to
Your original comment was this:

quote:

Maybe the easiest demonstration of this is the mother (it was Draco's mother who falsely claimed HP was dead wasn't it?) in the last movie. What exactly is her motivation there? Certainly Volde will discover that HP lives in short order... but she and the rest of her family are apparently not changing sides to turn on him... so exactly how does this make sense? Betray Volde by lying about HP being dead - but make no attempt to take him down when the fighting starts? At that point it seems to me you are pretty high on V's list of people who will be killed


And I completely disagree. Her motive is absolutely obvious and incredibly simple: she loves her son. She loves Draco so much that she turns her back on what she has worked a whole lifetime for.

You keep throwing lots of layers into it to make it this really complex decision and this massive departure for her chaacter, but I think you're wrong. A mother loves her son. It really is that simple.

She's not changing sides. She's choosing her son. Period. Nothing else. She's not joining up in the fight against Voldmort, she's just a mother trying to find her son.

I think you're trying to not understand. Her motivations are obvious and fit her character, and even several major themes of the movies/books: the importance of family and of love. Even Death Eaters love their kids.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37009 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:27 pm to
the premise of my objection is that her deception is so obvious and easily detected as to be a problem - because it ends up being more likely to get her and her family killed in rapid order

if you disagree that's fine, frankly i don't care to debate it any more
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

the premise of my objection is that her deception is so obvious and easily detected as to be a problem - because it ends up being more likely to get her and her family killed in rapid order



But the point is they were pretty much due to die at any day with Voldemort in charge, or Azkaban if Harry won and she didn't assist him. Narcissa took a Hans Landa type deal. She knew that she was on the loosing end of the war also knowing that she would face either life imprisonment or certain death. She saw an opportunity to correct everything and save her and her family, so she took it. If she didn't do this, regardless she would pay for it later. She took the only chance for her and her family to get out of Voldemort's regime and help rebuild the world for the better. Landa did this in Inglourious Basterds (although for far, far more selfish reasons), and it could have very easily backfired, but he knew that he would be fricked in a year or two, and he grabbed the small opportunity to save himself.
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 9:35 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37009 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

and she didn't assist him.


there really doesn't seem to be much evidence she was seeking clemency by helping HP

the quote from earlier indicated she had become neutral (which was a big change) - I don't think there's anything to say she actually came to the good side
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

there really doesn't seem to be much evidence she was seeking clemency by helping HP

the quote from earlier indicated she had become neutral (which was a big change) - I don't think there's anything to say she actually came to the good side


I don't think she came philosophically on Harry's side, but she only wanted to assist him so that they had some sort of alibi for getting out of Azkaban. She did it for the good of her family, not for what she actually believes in. I would like to think that their views on Anti-Muggle/Muggle Born subsided slightly with the Second Wizarding War, but I certainly think they were still prejudiced against them.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 9:49 pm to
One thing that bothered me in the movies is they didn't show how powerful Snape was in the movies, making him seem more like a little bitch. In the books, I took it Snape was by far the strongest wizard behind Voldemort/Dumbledore. Taking out the end of HBP, and giving him nothing of note in DH, really didn't give him his due IMO.

Also, didn't see why they changed the scene with Snape's death. I remember in the books he was pleading for Voldemort to let him do something which would lead to Harry getting his memories, where as in the movie he just said " My lord" once or twice.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Also, didn't see why they changed the scene with Snape's death. I remember in the books he was pleading for Voldemort to let him do something which would lead to Harry getting his memories, where as in the movie he just said " My lord" once or twice.



Snape's death was well done, and I actually like that they changed where the confrontation took place. Shrieking Shack would just be there for nostalgia really. Also in the movie it didn't make it as clear from Dumbledore when Snape would need to tell Harry about his fate. In the novels he just about shat himself when he saw the snake under magical protection, knowing it was finally time.

But I certainly agree with your first part.
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 10:04 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 10:52 pm to
i think that Voldemort would have killed her out of anger if she told him Harry was alive
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79132 posts
Posted on 7/19/11 at 10:48 am to
Friend just showed me this. Too flipping true.

Posted by Tha Herg
Herget Dorm
Member since Jul 2009
2965 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 12:02 am to
Can someone clarify a little more about Harry at Kings Station. I read the books but have long forgotten the details of this scene.

Was Dumbledore giving Harry the option of either dying or returning to the real world with the part of Voldemort inside of him dead? Thus removing Harry as a Horcrux?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 12:39 am to
quote:

Was Dumbledore giving Harry the option of either dying or returning to the real world with the part of Voldemort inside of him dead? Thus removing Harry as a Horcrux?



Yep, he could choose to move on, or to go back and defeat Voldemort personally and continue living life.
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:22 am to
watched it last night:

1. was dissapointed in the Mrs. Weasley killing of Lestrange. It seemed forced into the flow of the movie.

2. I do not think the greatest dark wizard of all time is willing to give the microphone to Neville Longbottom for a 4 minute rally call in front of everyone. (after 10 seconds it would/should have been green light/dead)

3. LOVED the slow motion hero snake kill by Longbottom

4. What the hell does harry do for a wand now that he destroyed the Elder before mending his?

5. Fleur is
Posted by Tha Herg
Herget Dorm
Member since Jul 2009
2965 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Yep, he could choose to move on, or to go back and defeat Vol continue living life.

So Voldemort killed one of his own Horcruxes in the forest. Does this mean there were eight horcruxes total since Vol didn't know about the one in Harry?
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 12Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram