re: New Netflix docu-series "Making a Murderer" (Spoilers)

I frankly don't care how long it takes to crush a car. It is not something that can be easily done by one person. A highly motivated person, knowledgeable person can do it perhaps with help perhaps by themselves without to much difficulty. However, it would take some amount of time.

First, lets think about a couple of questions. First, is steven Avery a highly motivated person? There is little doubt on this fact. The man is a dynamo. I mean he burned a body he was trying to hide that same day. He burned the cell phone and the palm pilot. He cleaned up the blood. He drove the car to the salvage yard. He made calls to cover his tracks. Therefore, there is little doubt that if he did it and did all these other things, well then that doesn't make sense.

There. Steven Avery did all this other stuff but didn't crush the car. He must be innocent.

Avery didn't do any of that shite. He's 100% innocent

quote:

---

Avery didn't do any of that shite. He's 100% innocent

---

No fricking doubt. I agree with you. Look at my prior post a couple of pages ago. It is simply amazing to see the sheer amount of planted evidence by the police. And it all makes so much sense.

I mean the bones outside the house were planted by the cops. Where did the cops get the bones? IDFGAS, they were obviously planted by the cops.
SA blood in the car? Planted by the cops. Hell, even the fbi is in on it. The stuff in the burn barrel? planted.

I mean the confession was totally coerced and then the police went back and added all this proof. Its crazy. Think of how complex a job the police did. Where did they get the car to plant? Where did they get the bones to plant? Where did they get the blood to plant? Where did they get the key to plant? How did they go back in time and put bleach stains on BD clothes that night?

It is an amazing job. Now I'm not saying the police killed TH, because that might be pushing it.

Hey, look over there! There was a serial killer in the state!

Now like I was saying, I'm not saying the police did it. Just they came across all these clues and planted they to make avery look like he did it and then got BD to confess for no reason other than the fact that these police are just mean. Why be mean against BD, a guy who never had a criminal record? Hell I don't know and I don't care, but they did it.

Oh, look over there! There is a picture of TH showing her holidng a keychain with multiple keys! They only found a key. Where did the rest go?

So look, I'm with you 100%. The Manawhatever the name of the county police department cleverly set up this amazing frame job of poor old steve avery encompassing multiple people, multiple departments, and over the course of months even involving the fbi. Yet not a single person has come forward yet. It is amazing. This department is so stupid it kinda messed up an amazingly simple investigation, yet was able to to weave a huge conspiracy together at great risk for many people involved.

I'm with you. SA is innocent. More importantly, I want to know how the police department pulled it off and more important who actually killed TH.

I'm just now finishing this up, and all I have to say is that I want to hit the lead prosecutor in the face with a shovel because of the tone in his voice when he is addressing the jury during any opening or closing argument.

frick that dude.

I'm not saying hes innocent. I just don't know how you can watch that and be 95% sure he killed her

Nobody should be convicted by that evidence. It's up to the State - not for you to prove your innocence.

It seems the burden gets lower and lower...unless you're OJ and have money.

quote:

---

SA burned the body right outside of his house and never moved the bones.

---

I mean shite man, if your first sentence is full of fallacy why would you expect someone to read the rest of your dribble? You need to tighten up your shot group and give it another try ol sport.

Well, Adnan Syed had his PCR hearing last week-ish. That was pretty interesting.

quote:

---

I think it's important to do outside reading about what wasn't included in the documentary before forming a final opinion. I'm in the process of doing that now.

---

Prepare yourself. The tards don't like objective opinions.

quote:

---

Either way I'm 99% convinced he did it based on information not included in the documentary.

---

I've always leaned towards him having done it over not doing it. Especially originally telling them he hadn't seen her, etc.

But nothing else adds up. Lots of evidence looks bad, but nothing goes together. Why would a guy scrub and trailer and garage of all blood after what would be a bloodbath, yet leave so many stupid things right out in the open? If he would have strangled her and they found the body in the car without any effort to hide things, I'd have no doubts. But instead, the prosecutions case leans on him being a master crime scene cleaner while at the same time being the most retarded criminal ever. I lean more to him doing it, but have a hard time putting someone in jail when you can't even tell the correct story of what was done.