- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Netflix docu-series "Making a Murderer" (Spoilers)
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:55 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:55 pm to Lester Earl
My jaw dropped when Avery's attorney told his family that the initial poll of jurors was 3 guilty, 7 not guilty, and 2 undecided. I wasn't shocked by the amount of jurors with not guilty, but couldn't believe everyone else gave in to the 3 guilty jurors.
I would have been more than willing to sit there for weeks never budging from a not guilty stance.
I would have been more than willing to sit there for weeks never budging from a not guilty stance.
This post was edited on 12/28/15 at 2:03 pm
1
Posted on 12/28/15 at 2:03 pm to KillerNut9
Question as I finish this up. Minor thing, but why was thee Sheriff that was involved with allegedly planting evidence when he shouldn't have been involved with the Avery investigation transporting Dassey? Isn't that a bad look to have him involved in any way?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 3:22 pm to Chillini
Where is her body?
Or can we say with some certainty that the pieces of bone were hers?
Or can we say with some certainty that the pieces of bone were hers?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 4:39 pm to AlbertMeansWell
They must have done DNA testing on the bones. I can't believe they just assumed it was her.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 5:59 pm to lsuwontonwrap
Was it conclusive the bones were ID'd through DNA testing?
Seems I recall the trial centered on "evidence" they could find no DNA on, namely that the trailer and garage. And with Dassey saying she was tied down, raped, and killed on the bed, why the big focus on the garage?
If no evidence was found during initial sweeps, either the CSI guys must be total frick-ups to not see a key laying in plain view, or the key was a plant.
Seems I recall the trial centered on "evidence" they could find no DNA on, namely that the trailer and garage. And with Dassey saying she was tied down, raped, and killed on the bed, why the big focus on the garage?
If no evidence was found during initial sweeps, either the CSI guys must be total frick-ups to not see a key laying in plain view, or the key was a plant.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 6:12 pm to TechBullDawg
The biggest red flag to me was the lack of blood splatter anywhere
If the state claims the girl was shot in that garage, there is no way to clean up all the junk that was in there. It's impossible.
I mean, to believe the state's claim that the girl was shot in the garage, then that meant Avery took the time to meticulously clean every square inch of the place, including all that junk. That's a very labor intensive and time consuming endeavor. Not to mention the time and effort it took to clean the trailer he lived in.
So after being that thorough , he then drives her car out back and just props some tree branches on it to try and hide it?
If the state claims the girl was shot in that garage, there is no way to clean up all the junk that was in there. It's impossible.
I mean, to believe the state's claim that the girl was shot in the garage, then that meant Avery took the time to meticulously clean every square inch of the place, including all that junk. That's a very labor intensive and time consuming endeavor. Not to mention the time and effort it took to clean the trailer he lived in.
So after being that thorough , he then drives her car out back and just props some tree branches on it to try and hide it?
This post was edited on 12/28/15 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 12/28/15 at 6:29 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
So after being that thorough , he then drives her car out back and just props some tree branches on it to try and hide it?
All while having a car compactor on property.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 6:33 pm to tylercsbn9
I still think Avery is "Probably" guilty though.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 6:42 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
All while having a car compactor on property
Probably drove right past it on the way to the stash spot
Posted on 12/28/15 at 7:38 pm to SPEEDY
Avery killed her in the back of the Rav4 and likely started to burn her somewhere that wasn't 20 feet from his house. I think the last of the multiple calls phone records show from Steve's phone to Teresa that day was him calling to try and locate it after she was dead. The call that only lasted 13 seconds at 4:30pm...
Posted on 12/28/15 at 7:45 pm to SPEEDY
quote:I watched enough Dexter to agree with you, but my #1 red flag is the key and clasp.
The biggest red flag to me was the lack of blood splatter anywhere
They search the trailer 6 times and no key. On 7th search without Calumet specifically watching Lenk, he finds the key. The key and clasp have zero DNA from Teresa which is almost theoretically impossible. She would use the key regularly. Yet Avery's blood is on it. OK.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 7:55 pm to AlbertMeansWell
quote:
I still think Avery is "Probably" guilty though.
can you give your top 3 reasons/evidence why?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 8:22 pm to SPEEDY
How about the notes of the phone call to the lady at the DNA testing lab. "Try to place her in the trailer/garage.)" why the frick does she need to know those details?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:03 pm to ATXTiger64
quote:And on top of that, she contaminates the test sample and ignored protocol for the first time in her career to endorse the positive test anyway.
How about the notes of the phone call to the lady at the DNA testing lab. "Try to place her in the trailer/garage.)" why the frick does she need to know those details?
Not suspicious as all. Nothing to see here.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:14 pm to LesGeaux45
I started watching yesterday. Already up to episode 6.
Holy frickballs. I'm memorized. I haven't read any of this thread or googled anything about this, so I have no idea what has happened since 2007 and I'm at the very beginning of the trial.
I'll check back in and catch up on reading this thread, not going to now for obvious reasons, but I'll just say this thing has me worked up, pissed off and wanting to beat some certain people's arse right now.
This shite is disturbing and memorizing. So far, wow.
Just wow.
Holy frickballs. I'm memorized. I haven't read any of this thread or googled anything about this, so I have no idea what has happened since 2007 and I'm at the very beginning of the trial.
I'll check back in and catch up on reading this thread, not going to now for obvious reasons, but I'll just say this thing has me worked up, pissed off and wanting to beat some certain people's arse right now.
This shite is disturbing and memorizing. So far, wow.
Just wow.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:22 pm to TechBullDawg
quote:
Was it conclusive the bones were ID'd through DNA testing?
I think they identified one of her teeth thru dental records.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:26 pm to drizztiger
quote:
ignored protocol for the first time in her career
Exactly...I am truly baffled how any of this "evidence" is ligit.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:32 pm to goldenbadger08
I love all the racing jackets the Avery family sports.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:33 pm to diat150
quote:
I think they identified one of her teeth thru dental records.
I think there was also a little bit of flesh left on a piece of leg/hip bone fragment.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:46 pm to yurintroubl
Speaking of the remains. I also found it curious while watching that the DA's expert basically said the reason she believed the body was burned in the burn pit 20-feet from Avery's trailer was because that's where most of the remains were found. That was her answer.
When in fact it makes no logical sense. And the defense witness then was spot on. The actual burn site would have the least amount of remains in a situation like this where remains are found in three locations. You burn in one spot then pick up everything and move it, but you'll miss remnants.
To think Avery and Dassey burned her in the pit outside his trailer then randomly picked up a small portion of the remains to move to 1. another burn pit and 2. a burn barrel and then 3. leaving most of the remains right outside his trailer is a very difficult narrative to believe.
When in fact it makes no logical sense. And the defense witness then was spot on. The actual burn site would have the least amount of remains in a situation like this where remains are found in three locations. You burn in one spot then pick up everything and move it, but you'll miss remnants.
To think Avery and Dassey burned her in the pit outside his trailer then randomly picked up a small portion of the remains to move to 1. another burn pit and 2. a burn barrel and then 3. leaving most of the remains right outside his trailer is a very difficult narrative to believe.
Page 11 of 84
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News