- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Netflix docu-series "Making a Murderer" (Spoilers)
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:24 am to brmark70816
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:24 am to brmark70816
quote:
You really think he is innocent?
I think it's more believable he's innocent than guilty.
and what you continue to not acknowledge even though people have pointed it out many times is that the defense doesn't have to prove he's innocent. They just have to shed reasonable doubt that he's guilty. And holy hell there is reasonable doubt by the frick ton.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:25 am to bayoubighead
quote:
, there was also non-blood DNA evidence on the hood latch. I don’t believe the police would plant — or know to plant — that evidence.
I haven't made it that far into it yet, so I don't know if this was argued in court, but is it not possible she asked him to check something out for her while she was there? Maybe check some fluids or look at a fan belt or something for her?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:59 am to LesGeaux45
Can't believe I just binged this whole thing so quickly. Still trying to process all that I've seen. I'll start by asking a simple question:
When Avery was released in 2003, supposedly the cops (I think specifically Holborn) created a record the very next day of the 1995/96 phone call that came in from the neighboring county saying they had the wrong guy in jail.
Question: from the perspective of the cops, how would they have perceived that move as somehow beneficial to them?
When Avery was released in 2003, supposedly the cops (I think specifically Holborn) created a record the very next day of the 1995/96 phone call that came in from the neighboring county saying they had the wrong guy in jail.
Question: from the perspective of the cops, how would they have perceived that move as somehow beneficial to them?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:13 am to Big Scrub TX
My observations:
-Avery's IQ most certainly is not 73. He is of at least average intelligence (100) - and potentially as high as 105, IMO. We've seen what 73 looks like - and it's Brendan.
-As bad as I feel about Avery, the true, chilling outrage is Brendan. If the system can consume a literally retarded child like that, then I think we all need to be taking a long hard look at what we've become.
-It's clear that the vast majority of citizens have had zero exposure to the well-worn topics of coerced confessions and faulty eyewitness testimony. The prosecution actually said in it's closing remarks in the Dassey case: "innocent people don't confess". Nothing could be less true...nor more obscured from the public consciousness.
-Is it just me, or did I see Holborn as the one who escorted Brendan out of the courtroom after his guilty verdict was read? WTF? Why was he there? These people are shameless.
-It seemed like Strang was legitimately, personally moved re the entire situation...so why isn't he contributing any pro bono resources to continue to assist?
-Buting is Buster from Arrested Development
-there's any number of figures to be angry at, but I really think most of my ire is reserved for the senior people involved...the judges. How could any person with a brain have presided over the motion proceedings for Brendan's new trial and come away with ANYTHING other than vacating the result? For chrissake...HIS OWN frickING "DEFENSE" LAWYER SET HIM UP!!!
-the Halbach family had years to grieve and process this information...why do they seem so hellbent on imprisoning people who are likely to be innocent? Don't they care about catching the real killer?
-Even if you convict Brendan on the murder...how the hell do you convict him on the rape? What "evidence" was there other than his "confession"?
-It's patently evident that the system now exists to perpetuate itself. The FBI douche that came riding to the rescue was unbelievable. A litany of judges who were informed in great detail of VAST police and prosecutorial misconduct - including multiple cases of improper handling of evidence and the securing of crime scenes - evidently have simply abandoned the concept of "reasonable doubt".
-the smokeshow reporter will become famous and have multiple memes dedicated to her. Can't wait.
-I'm hoping LSU students get real creative with signs for the game in September in regards to this case.
-Avery's IQ most certainly is not 73. He is of at least average intelligence (100) - and potentially as high as 105, IMO. We've seen what 73 looks like - and it's Brendan.
-As bad as I feel about Avery, the true, chilling outrage is Brendan. If the system can consume a literally retarded child like that, then I think we all need to be taking a long hard look at what we've become.
-It's clear that the vast majority of citizens have had zero exposure to the well-worn topics of coerced confessions and faulty eyewitness testimony. The prosecution actually said in it's closing remarks in the Dassey case: "innocent people don't confess". Nothing could be less true...nor more obscured from the public consciousness.
-Is it just me, or did I see Holborn as the one who escorted Brendan out of the courtroom after his guilty verdict was read? WTF? Why was he there? These people are shameless.
-It seemed like Strang was legitimately, personally moved re the entire situation...so why isn't he contributing any pro bono resources to continue to assist?
-Buting is Buster from Arrested Development
-there's any number of figures to be angry at, but I really think most of my ire is reserved for the senior people involved...the judges. How could any person with a brain have presided over the motion proceedings for Brendan's new trial and come away with ANYTHING other than vacating the result? For chrissake...HIS OWN frickING "DEFENSE" LAWYER SET HIM UP!!!
-the Halbach family had years to grieve and process this information...why do they seem so hellbent on imprisoning people who are likely to be innocent? Don't they care about catching the real killer?
-Even if you convict Brendan on the murder...how the hell do you convict him on the rape? What "evidence" was there other than his "confession"?
-It's patently evident that the system now exists to perpetuate itself. The FBI douche that came riding to the rescue was unbelievable. A litany of judges who were informed in great detail of VAST police and prosecutorial misconduct - including multiple cases of improper handling of evidence and the securing of crime scenes - evidently have simply abandoned the concept of "reasonable doubt".
-the smokeshow reporter will become famous and have multiple memes dedicated to her. Can't wait.
-I'm hoping LSU students get real creative with signs for the game in September in regards to this case.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:17 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
What "evidence" was there other than his "confession"?
Bro, did you not see his stickman 50 Shades of Gray picture? He clearly painted the picture of what went on in the Red Room of Pain.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:20 am to brmark70816
"Innocent" is not a jury verdict.
"Innocence" isn't the issue.
The standard for a jury delivered guilty verdict is "beyond a reasonable doubt".
There is more than enough reasonable doubt for me to say "not guilty".
Let's not even consider the police and prosecutorial misconduct. Let's forget the suspicious finding of the key, the multiple unexplained cremains sites, the absolutely coerced "confession" from Brendan.
I would find not guilty because of two things.
1 - Avery's blood in the RAV4 but none of Avery's fingerprints. It is literally impossible for me to believe that Avery left blood smears from a CUT ON HIS FINGER but no fingerprints. Like, how does one even explain how that is possible???
2 - The complete lack of Teresa's blood or DNA in the primary and secondary "crime scenes". She is allegedly stabbed in the abdomen, slashed in her throat, and shot ELEVEN times. Yet, no blood or DNA from Teresa Halbach is found in Steve Avery's trailer or his garage.
The prosecution's own theory of the crime can not be proven......beyond a reasonable doubt.
Don't even get me started on my suspicions on what went on in that jury room.
The first jury poll was 7 not guilty, 3 guilty, and 2 undecided.
One of the 3 not guilty votes came from a juror with a family member employed by the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department. Something stinks there.
"Innocence" isn't the issue.
The standard for a jury delivered guilty verdict is "beyond a reasonable doubt".
There is more than enough reasonable doubt for me to say "not guilty".
Let's not even consider the police and prosecutorial misconduct. Let's forget the suspicious finding of the key, the multiple unexplained cremains sites, the absolutely coerced "confession" from Brendan.
I would find not guilty because of two things.
1 - Avery's blood in the RAV4 but none of Avery's fingerprints. It is literally impossible for me to believe that Avery left blood smears from a CUT ON HIS FINGER but no fingerprints. Like, how does one even explain how that is possible???
2 - The complete lack of Teresa's blood or DNA in the primary and secondary "crime scenes". She is allegedly stabbed in the abdomen, slashed in her throat, and shot ELEVEN times. Yet, no blood or DNA from Teresa Halbach is found in Steve Avery's trailer or his garage.
The prosecution's own theory of the crime can not be proven......beyond a reasonable doubt.
Don't even get me started on my suspicions on what went on in that jury room.
The first jury poll was 7 not guilty, 3 guilty, and 2 undecided.
One of the 3 not guilty votes came from a juror with a family member employed by the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department. Something stinks there.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:24 am to BamaChick
quote:
The prosecution's own theory of the crime can not be proven......beyond a reasonable doubt.
Quite simply...this. The one thing we really do know is that there's massive doubt that it happened as the prosecution presented it.
quote:
Don't even get me started on my suspicions on what went on in that jury room.
The first jury poll was 7 not guilty, 3 guilty, and 2 undecided.
One of the 3 not guilty votes came from a juror with a family member employed by the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department. Something stinks there.
Yeah, I can't wait to hear more on this. I'm somewhat impressed by the dismissed juror sticking his neck out.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:31 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
-I'm hoping LSU students get real creative with signs for the game in September in regards to this case.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:37 am to Big Scrub TX
I started following Jerome Buting on Twitter and he is doing a lot to get the word out and is accepting any information on new leads and evidence.
The one positive thing I did take away from this docuseries is that there a still real, honest to God defense attorneys out there. Buting and Dean Strang did an amazing job with everything stacked against them.
It's a real shame that Avery had to settle his civil suit for only $400,000 and that he had to use all of it to defend himself against this bullshite. But he got his money's worth.
If you are too poor to afford real defense counsel - like Brendan Dassey - then may God have mercy on your soul.
The one positive thing I did take away from this docuseries is that there a still real, honest to God defense attorneys out there. Buting and Dean Strang did an amazing job with everything stacked against them.
It's a real shame that Avery had to settle his civil suit for only $400,000 and that he had to use all of it to defend himself against this bullshite. But he got his money's worth.
If you are too poor to afford real defense counsel - like Brendan Dassey - then may God have mercy on your soul.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:40 am to BamaChick
quote:
I started following Jerome Buting on Twitter and he is doing a lot to get the word out and is accepting any information on new leads and evidence.
The one positive thing I did take away from this docuseries is that there a still real, honest to God defense attorneys out there. Buting and Dean Strang did an amazing job with everything stacked against them.
I'm happy to hear this, but it seems to me like most of these mid-late career, very successful attys should be dedicating a good % of their time to doing pro bono work. I really respected Drizin and the crew at Northwestern. I was literally agape when that judge denied their motion on Brendan's case.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:55 am to BamaChick
quote:
Buting and Dean Strang did an amazing job with everything stacked against them
Forgot to mention this earlier but every episode I watch I'm amazed at these guys. They are AWESOME. Does strang (I get them confused..the shorter one) remind anyone else of bob odenkirk? His voice sometimes could be a dead on ringer.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:08 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Forgot to mention this earlier but every episode I watch I'm amazed at these guys. They are AWESOME. Does strang (I get them confused..the shorter one) remind anyone else of bob odenkirk? His voice sometimes could be a dead on ringer.
I was very impressed with that team. I particularly enjoyed the scenes of them in a room plotting their next tactic and trying to figure out how it would play with the jury.
I still can't put my finger on who Strang reminds me of, but Buting is definitely Buster.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:11 pm to Big Scrub TX
they dont' look alike but I"m telling you strang could be an odenkirk voice double.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:13 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
they dont' look alike but I"m telling you strang could be an odenkirk voice double.
I didn't notice that at all...I'll go back and see if I can detect it.
I'm still a little put off that Strang isn't working pro bono on the case now.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:58 pm to Big Scrub TX
Finished it last night and holy shite. I work in the media and have sat in on several trials, IE the Eddie Ray Routh one including many others and in the case of Avery and Brendan i dont see how the fricks can live with themselves finding them guilty with what was put before them.
Incredible.
Incredible.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 1:22 pm to brmark70816
quote:
You really think he is innocent
You don't understand how trials work do you?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 1:24 pm to McCaigBro69
I've gotten baked before each episode I watch, and I end up so fascinated that I've contemplated going to the nearest courthouse and just sitting in the back and watching a trial
of course, I'm sure they wouldn't be as interesting as this one.
of course, I'm sure they wouldn't be as interesting as this one.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 2:20 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
As bad as I feel about Avery, the true, chilling outrage is Brendan. If the system can consume a literally retarded child like that, then I think we all need to be taking a long hard look at what we've become.
Agree 100%. Brendan reminds me of that one guy from the West Memphis 3 that was really mentally challenged. Hell, even if my 16 year old was very smart, I wouldn't let them talk to the police without myself as the parent present and/or with a lawyer present.
Maybe I'm harsh too, but Brendan's mom wasn't exactly mom of the year even though she does seem to love him.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 2:22 pm to BamaChick
Rashida Jones as Ms. Reporter McSexypants
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 2:22 pm
Popular
Back to top



0






