Started By
Message

Midway

Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:26 pm
Posted by Woolfman_8
Old Metairie
Member since Oct 2018
2072 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:26 pm
About 20 minutes in... am I crazy or is this some of the worst acting and writing I’ve ever seen?

Clarifying, I’m talking about the new version. Not the 1970’s version.
This post was edited on 2/11/21 at 4:48 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112235 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:27 pm to
You can’t make a judgement on a movie like this until you’ve atleast hit the Midway point



Ayoooo
Posted by Woolfman_8
Old Metairie
Member since Oct 2018
2072 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:28 pm to


Touché
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20220 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:37 pm to
The 1976 version is better.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26056 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

About 20 minutes in... am I crazy or is this some of the worst acting and writing I’ve ever seen?


The 1970's version is light years better than the one made more recently.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16831 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 5:03 pm to
I thought this was about Mortal Kombat.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58036 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 5:06 pm to
The acting is so so at best but for the most part the battle sequences are fairly accurate. Way more so than the the 70s movie or Bay's Pearl Harbor.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141658 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

The acting is so so at best but for the most part the battle sequences are fairly accurate. Way more so than the the 70s movie
The '76 version battle scenes are all stock footage.

The '70 Tora Tora Tora spent their money on a spectacular attack section, and had no money left for big name stars. The film was a box office disaster.

The producers of the '76 Midway took that lessen to heart and spent their budget on name stars.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20698 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 6:21 pm to
I liked the entire 70’s midway

I thought the new one was ok and some of the battle scenes were better but you’re comparing advanced technology against 70’s technology and actual battle footage.

Ill still watch them both again but for some reason I have to watch original midway, Patton, and John Wayne’s longest day almost every time they come on.

Wish we had a good Pearl Harbor that I could watch every year on dec 7
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30357 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 6:27 pm to
From Here to Eternity (1953) is better than Pearl Harbor (2001) too. Neither is really a war movie. They're both love stories.
Posted by Tigerfan1274
Member since May 2019
3128 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 6:56 pm to
Midway did a good job with the historical accuracy of the events in the order they unfolded. But the acting and screenplay was not good.
Posted by Volt
Ascension Island, S Atlantic Ocean
Member since Nov 2009
2959 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 7:22 pm to
Thanks for checking in on us.
<--We're all good out here.

I watched it when it first came out and was wanting to see more of the actual island.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

From Here to Eternity (1953) is better than Pearl Harbor (2001) too. Neither is really a war movie. They're both love stories.


Tora! Tora! Tora! kicks arse as well.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
15781 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 7:31 pm to
The English actor with the overbite who got replaced in GoT ruined the movie.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51241 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 8:27 pm to
It is a bad movie, and the fact that a lot of people like it says a lot about the quality of today's big-budget films.
Posted by Woolfman_8
Old Metairie
Member since Oct 2018
2072 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 8:42 pm to
I thought the acting was horrendous, the action was meh. But the acting was just so bad that it ruined everything.
Posted by TygerDurden
Member since Sep 2009
1846 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 10:13 pm to
You’re not wrong. Just not a good movie. The story itself should lend to a making great movie. The shear number of just god awful movie storylines and acting today is astounding. This new Midway is just Bad Acting stuffed around eye candy CGI.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30019 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 10:14 pm to
Could not finish it. It is such an epic story with American men as underdogs. Only Hollywood could frick it up.
Posted by NOSA
Member since Jan 2004
9612 posts
Posted on 2/11/21 at 10:28 pm to
It's a Roland Emmerich movie, that's all that has to be said about it. It was independently funded because no studio would greenlight it and the previews looked horrendous.

The guy somehow made Independence Day and The Patriot (they're at least entertaining) and has made nothing but garbage, no plot, CGI fests since.
This post was edited on 2/11/21 at 10:35 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98739 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Could not finish it. It is such an epic story with American men as underdogs. Only Hollywood could frick it up.


Hollywood doesn't want to show America winning, so they had to frick it up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram