- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Man of Steel 59% on RT
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:01 am
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:01 am
Damnit, Nolan why didnt you direct this!? ??
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:02 am to Rittdog
went from certified fresh to rotten
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:08 am to Rittdog
I thought it was good -- not great. I walked out liking the original one better.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:19 am to Rittdog
Have you seen it yet?
I thought it was great! I think people who don't like it go in expecting another Christopher Reeves movie and don't realize they're watching a Zack Snyder film.
And I stopped putting any stock into Rotten Tomatoes after I saw they gave Boondock Saints 20%.
I thought it was great! I think people who don't like it go in expecting another Christopher Reeves movie and don't realize they're watching a Zack Snyder film.
And I stopped putting any stock into Rotten Tomatoes after I saw they gave Boondock Saints 20%.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:23 am to DrTyger
quote:
And I stopped putting any stock into Rotten Tomatoes after I saw they gave Boondock Saints 20%.
I used to think Boondock Saints was the shite. Watched it with my dad who was a little more critical, which made me a little more critical, and realized it wasn't that good.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:23 am to DrTyger
They gave Kingdom of the Crystal Skull a 78%. Their opinions are invalid.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:24 am to Rittdog
Stop worrying about what other people think about a movie
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:25 am to Rittdog
It's Nolan's lowest rated movie (that he's involved with) on RT now
This post was edited on 6/14/13 at 10:27 am
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:40 am to Rittdog
quote:
Damnit, Nolan why didnt you direct this!? ??
I really don't think it matters, Superman is a character that just really doesn't translate to screen well this day in age.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:41 am to Tactical1
I have been waiting for this film to hit for several years and have let my hype rise to "best heroic movie ever" levels. When the mediocre critic reviews began to filter in, I and many others felt a lot of disappointment. I entered my viewing with lowered expectations and left kind of confused with many of the negative accounts. I think many, including myself, entered this updated mythos with our own personal best Superman/Clark Kent preference. I'm personally invested in 10 years of Smallville, so Tom Welling is my "ideal" characterization (many use Reeve as the standard). The initial buildup to his taking the Superman mantle, seemed a little "unearned" as it took Welling ten years to don the tights. I would have preferred more inspection of his moral code development. Once the action took off, I was able to shake my prejudices and enjoy the roller coaster ride.
some of the negatives include:
- Superman's seemingly lack of regard for the safety of human bystanders (collateral damage)during the skyscraper leveling endgame.
- Lack of warmth and hope as compared to the previous movies/episodes. I never got that standup up and cheer feeling due to the human death toll and Clark's final Zod encounter/decision.
- There was actually a little too much action which took some emotional weight from the 45 minutes of final battle scenes.
- somewhat rushed love story
- lack of "Metropolis Clark"
positives:
- good portrayal of the adoptive and biological parents.
- I like the organic Krypton over the Donner ice planet.
- fighting scenes that were lightning fast and well choreographed.
- the heavy use of sci-fi elements.
- faora
- nice sequel jumping off point from the ending.
- young clark smallville flashbacks.
-Jor-El's story integration
With a little more character development, heart, and positive atmosphere, the sequel could be the film the character truly deserves. Definitely a must see film for the technical achievements alone.
some of the negatives include:
- Superman's seemingly lack of regard for the safety of human bystanders (collateral damage)during the skyscraper leveling endgame.
- Lack of warmth and hope as compared to the previous movies/episodes. I never got that standup up and cheer feeling due to the human death toll and Clark's final Zod encounter/decision.
- There was actually a little too much action which took some emotional weight from the 45 minutes of final battle scenes.
- somewhat rushed love story
- lack of "Metropolis Clark"
positives:
- good portrayal of the adoptive and biological parents.
- I like the organic Krypton over the Donner ice planet.
- fighting scenes that were lightning fast and well choreographed.
- the heavy use of sci-fi elements.
- faora
- nice sequel jumping off point from the ending.
- young clark smallville flashbacks.
-Jor-El's story integration
With a little more character development, heart, and positive atmosphere, the sequel could be the film the character truly deserves. Definitely a must see film for the technical achievements alone.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:47 am to ipodking
quote:
Stop worrying about what other people think about a movie
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:50 am to Tactical1
quote:
Superman is a character that just really doesn't translate to screen well this day in age
Why?
Posted on 6/14/13 at 10:58 am to Rittdog
Audience with an 82% which has always been more telling to me on the off chance that i'm judging whether i'm going to go see a movie based on reviews.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 11:01 am to Rittdog
I think Nolan is the reason the story was so choppy in the beginning. Trying to cram TOO much in as fast as possible to get to the action. He was the producer and wrote the story. He should have caught the editing issues early but simply disregarded or missed them.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 11:25 am to LSUmakemewanna
LINK /
Here is a cracked article that pretty much sums it up.
Personably I find it difficult to put Superman on screen as difficult it is to give a billionaire problems in a film.
Here is a cracked article that pretty much sums it up.
Personably I find it difficult to put Superman on screen as difficult it is to give a billionaire problems in a film.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 11:36 am to Tactical1
From that Cracked article:
Totally Agree. Every Superman movie misses the boat here.
quote:
Nearly every writer who has ever tackled a Superman story arc has tried to test the limits of his powers by pitting him against an alien being who's even stronger and more super, but they are completely ignoring the potential all around them for an engaging narrative about Superman struggling and failing to help everyone all at once from broad, systemic issues.
Totally Agree. Every Superman movie misses the boat here.
This post was edited on 6/14/13 at 11:39 am
Posted on 6/14/13 at 12:31 pm to Tactical1
So, there isn't really a problem with "translating to screen" (which I hate the sound of more and more every time I hear it). I think it's quite easy to put him on screen. Just as easy as it is to put Batman, Avengers, Batman again, Spiderman, etc. It's a comic book character (and a very successful one at that) being put on a movie screen. How does it not translate?
And billionaires do have problems....just not our problems.
And billionaires do have problems....just not our problems.
Posted on 6/14/13 at 12:33 pm to LSUmakemewanna
quote:
So, there isn't really a problem with "translating to screen" (which I hate the sound of more and more every time I hear it). I think it's quite easy to put him on screen. Just as easy as it is to put Batman, Avengers, Batman again, Spiderman, etc. It's a comic book character (and a very successful one at that) being put on a movie screen. How does it not translate?
Batman = human; can die easily
Avengers = team building issues; plenty of humans that can die easily
Spiderman = human; can die easily
I think the point is that Superman is so fricking powerful that no one is ever going to whip his arse.
This post was edited on 6/14/13 at 12:45 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News