Started By
Message

looking back at Endgame I think it kind of sucked

Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:33 am
Posted by Grad92
Member since Feb 2023
1027 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:33 am
they really wasted an opportunity to wrap up most character storylines.

1. Fat Thor was a slap in the face to the audience (haha Thor fat=funny)
2. Thanos sucks. Basically turned into bowser
3. Bruce Bannner killed Hulk
4. Cap and Iron man basically pretend Civil War never happened.
etc.

movie picks up 5 years in the future, and everyone who was brought back appeared where they vanished from.

millions dead undoing the snap, earth continues to rotate, how do we know that theyd even come back on earth or appear in the space just to die again.

The world after 5 years has adjusted to its population, just like it did after the plague/WW2. throwing millions back into the world would put a strain on the economy if they even live. The demand for housing, food, work, would shoot sky high. not everyone would be able to jump back in to life. I see a ton of problems of undoing the snap that the smartest people in the world never even though about

Just a ton of fan service that I will admit I was happy when I finished it the first time. But looking back, the plot just fricking stinks. It does have a few good scenes,

but overall as a movie today I give it a 4/10.
This post was edited on 8/7/23 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89486 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:35 am to
I laughed out loud at the girl power scene. I don't think we thought "Fat Thor" was the end of Thor, though.

quote:

but overall as a movie today I give it a 4/10.



Do you have to get into negatives to rate all the MCU films since? I mean, would any of them outside, maybe, GOTG 3 get a rating above 0 if Endgame is 4/10? (Serious question...)
Posted by LSUFAN227
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
457 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:36 am to
Not going to dive in to all of this one, but don’t you think both Cap and Iron Man would be rationale enough to put Civil War in the back seat after half of the universe disappeared. Especially after both fighting Thanos individually in Infinity War?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52925 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:37 am to
All marvel sucks dude


It’s cgi Michael bay style movies made for babies
Posted by LSUFAN227
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
457 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:38 am to
Do agree though that I got tired of Fat Thor. Made for some comedy but I have trouble watching his scenes when Ive rewatched the movie.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14877 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:38 am to
A 4/10 is laughable

and saying Cap and Tony pretend Civil War didn't happen also makes me question how much you actually understand the movie, or if this post is just a troll attempt. It's a huge central point of their relationship throughout the movie.
This post was edited on 8/7/23 at 11:39 am
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8143 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:40 am to
I don't agree. Fat Thor was done well, especially when his mother told him to eat a salad. Thanos was Thanos, what else did you want from him? Cap and Iron Man got together in the heat of the battles, they knew they needed help.

The Bruce Banner and Hulk thing, yeah I can go for that one. I wish Banner would have just been more controlling of Hulk and it wasn't such a fight back and forth.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51501 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:40 am to
IW was really good. Endgame, to me, felt like too much fanservice. Thanos was a huge reason IW was great, but unfortunately he had a much smaller role here that I think hurt the film.
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10579 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

1. Fat Thor was a slap in the face to the audience (haha Thor fat=funny)
2. Thanos sucks
3. Bruce Bannner killed Hulk
4. Cap and Iron man basically pretend Civil War never happened.
etc.


5. Why not just have Captain Marvel show up in the beginning and kick Thanos' arse? Game over man.
6. 100% grim and serious doesn't work for comic book movies.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15702 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:47 am to
Felt the same as I watched it. The best fight scenes were replays.

And going back in time is just lazy writing for plot lines.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51501 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

100% grim and serious doesn't work for comic book movies


Depends on the character. Batman, Daredevil, Dredd...those work better being dark.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52925 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

5. Why not just have Captain Marvel show up in the beginning and kick Thanos' arse? Game over man

That would’ve been really powerful. We all know Kathleen kennedy created thanos to be an allegory for trump. That’s why his hands were so small
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30550 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

1. Fat Thor was a slap in the face to the audience (haha Thor fat=funny)

No
quote:

2. Thanos sucks

Compared to Infinity War Thanos, yes
quote:

3. Bruce Bannner killed Hulk

No
quote:

4. Cap and Iron man basically pretend Civil War never happened.

Wtf no. Did you watch Infinity War

quote:

The world after 5 years has adjusted to its population, just like it did after the plague/WW2.

The opening scenes are showing how the world has crumbled and failed to compensate for the massive loss. You obviously missed the entire movie

quote:

I see a ton of problems of undoing the snap that the smartest people in the world never even though about

Which is why the follow up effects of the snap are still being discussed in the MCU, and were heavily discussed or weighed into the plots of the first few movies and shows following

In conclusion, I rate you as stupid AF and you were probably tripping balls while you watched these movies
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7492 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The Bruce Banner and Hulk thing, yeah I can go for that one.


I was prepared for Rage hulk to come busting out of the wreckage of the Avengers' Compound.

we see professor Hulk holding it up, but starting to struggle.
instead of Ant-Man becoming Giant-Man, I just knew the big bad bastard hulk was was about to just wreck shite.

and it didn't happen.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:16 pm to
I remember walking out of it thinking it wouldn’t age nearly as well as Infinity War. I tend to hate time travel gimmicks.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30550 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

IW was really good. Endgame, to me, felt like too much fanservice. Thanos was a huge reason IW was great, but unfortunately he had a much smaller role here that I think hurt the film.

IW was a masterpiece. You can’t judge EG against it IMO. IW was the Empire Strikes Back of MCU

IW was all about Thanos. He’s the main character. It’s not an Avengers movie at its core.
EG is about the last hurrah of the original Avengers. Putting them all together for one last epic battle to decide the fate of Earth and likely the universe. It’s an Avengers movie at its core. It’s about a group of heroes teaming up and being more than sum of their combined talents alone. Those heroes must combine to defeat a villain greater than the sum of their powers alone.

Unfortunately EG has the core time travel flaws which really take from the movie, and Thanos is significantly reduced in characterization from the triumphant villain who believes he is morally right to a murderous thug with badass power. But the reduced characterization is important to achieve that true Avengers movie. If you don’t reduce his characterization, you end up with the comic book scenario where they don’t kill Thanos but he turns into a hero himself. Which would have pissed off audiences far more. But we were all still giddy with how incredible the characterization of Thanos was in IW that it’s hard to handle the reduced depth in EG
This post was edited on 8/7/23 at 12:19 pm
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54066 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:22 pm to
Infinity War is much better.

Endgame is pretty good but its not close to Infinity War.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54066 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

who believes he is morally right to a murderous thug with badass power


Yup.

It is a Thanos from a different time in his life but still the character is much better in IW.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30550 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

It is a Thanos from a different time in his life but still the character is much better in IW.

Definitely. The EG Thanos does suggest he changes perspective to become just the murderous thug, but still it’s hard to pull back the characterization. Same struggle with Gamora in EG and GOTG3 where there’s the obvious disconnect and it makes the character really unlikeable. I still think it was important for them to decharacterize Thanos in EG to get the classic Avengers movie though. You didn’t want anyone saying “Thanos was right” at the end of EG like they were at the end of IW. You needed the entire audience on the side of the Avengers
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30550 posts
Posted on 8/7/23 at 12:29 pm to
Even further, every plot has a climax. We built up Thanos for years. IW was the perfect climax. EG was inevitably going to be falling action and resolution in the long term plot line. It’s a natural come down from the pinnacle of plot line heights
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram