Started By
Message

re: "Killers of the Flower Moon' Official Trailer #2

Posted on 9/14/23 at 7:25 am to
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63712 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 7:25 am to
quote:

don't be obtuse.


Yeah, I'm going to take your advice based on the completely asinine statements that you've made in this thread.

quote:

values used/misused/miscontrued and abused coming from the Jewish and Christian spreading from Europe during the 1000s did the greatest service to the world in advancing us out of the dark ages possible in regard to the advancement of science, healthcare, and society.



The term "Judeo-Christian" was not even used until the early 20th century when dispensationalism got going. Nothing about Western Civilization was "Judeo".

Do you refer to Islam as "Judeo-Christian-Islam"? If not, why not? It would make just as much sense.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40147 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Since they're giving away the ending in the damned trailer...



let me guess.... Leo gets framed for all of the murders and goes to prison?


never read the book.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 8:13 am to
Looks great, will watch.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 8:18 am to
quote:

let me guess.... Leo gets framed for all of the murders and goes to prison?


never read the book.


I mean, you can take 5 minutes and read about the event.

Leo's character Ernest Burkhart was a true piece of garbage shite.

This thread is wild, and some of the takes in here are really bad. Ernest Burkhart died in 1986. This isn't some distant past event.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 8:24 am
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38439 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 10:02 am to
quote:

i know there are exceptions, but please let me know the tribes that did not have rape, murder, and pillaging of other nations for 100 years before Europeans showed up.
And let me know if there's any race that hasn't raped, murdered, and pillaged other races. Bringing that stuff up in here just gives fodder to those looking to justify the world as woke, and rationalizing the mistreatment of others. Yeah, Native Americans have a bloody past, as do we all. But it doesn't mitigate the fact that the murders in this case are singularly horrifying due to the level of duplicity that inserted the killers into those families.

The natives were less than a generation away from killing their own people and whites. The whites were lynching blacks at 60 a year. Everybody was terrible. Every race still has murderous assholes. But none of that should lessen the importance of this one, horrifying instance that showed how far men would go to satiate their greed.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6127 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 10:41 am to
quote:

The issue is it wouldn't even be made if it were the other way around.


At what point in American history did native people hold more power and money than white people, and then use that power to murder white people to make even more money?

If it were the other way around, it would be fantasy. Scorsese hasn't shown much interest in that genre.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32394 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 10:49 am to
you people misunderstand me.

my initial post in this thread is saying that white people did very bad things to the Osage Indian Tribe. I was calling out people trying to say "woke garbage" or "revisionist history" instead of actually reading about what the story really does entail without any "woke points" for modern sensitivities.

i was trying to say (however poorly) "hey i'm not some bleeding heart liberal on our treatment of the Native Americans it was awful. They were terrible. We were terrible. I don't buy into most woke virtue signaling, but this is a real story about how a bunch of white people married into the Osage tribe and started killing off family members to increase their share of the oil money"

quote:


The natives were less than a generation away from killing their own people and whites. The whites were lynching blacks at 60 a year. Everybody was terrible. Every race still has murderous assholes.


Agreed and that's why I said the indian wars and our treatment was atrocious, but I'm still glad America won them. The world wouldn't be a better place if America had been beaten back to the East Coast and Mexico kept south of the Rio Grande.


quote:

But none of that should lessen the importance of this one, horrifying instance that showed how far men would go to satiate their greed.


this is what i was trying to get across in my initial post. no matter your opinion on the treatment of native Americans, these guys were terrible and did terrible things in the name of greed. it's a fascinating story.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32394 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 10:55 am to
quote:

At what point in American history did native people hold more power and money than white people, and then use that power to murder white people to make even more money?



we got our asses kicked across the continent by the Comanches for a few decades. moneywise, sure we had more (which was inconsequential to them,) but they owned the West for a good while.

hell, the first well documented encounter white people had with Comanches was the Fort Parker Massacre and we weren't the ones doing the massacring for a change.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 10:59 am
Posted by PillPusher
Gulf Coast
Member since Oct 2009
5947 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 11:02 am to
There seems to be a whole lot of people in this thread who think every Indian tribe was the same.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71155 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 11:08 am to
quote:

This isn't some distant past event.


It took place 100 years ago.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37331 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 11:13 am to
This thread should just be whacked so we can start over and discuss the actual film.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60095 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 11:16 am to
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38439 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

This isn't some distant past event.
quote:

It took place 100 years ago.

When my grandparents were already adults. It's not ancient history.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71155 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

When my grandparents were already adults. It's not ancient history.


Of course not.

Most historians regard the ancient period as having ended in the year AD 476 with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. However, it's well outside of living memory and is thus "ancient" to us who are alive today. The fact that your grandparents were adults during this period says more about YOUR age than it does about the recency of the Osage Murders. The Civil War was still well within living memory when this shite went down.

My grandfather was a World War II veteran and he was barely in elementary school when the killings finally stopped.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 12:40 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70716 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:45 pm to
Morons who are educated on history via Twitter.
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5194 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

This thread is nuts. fricking nuts. Anyway, I only have like 3 hours left till I finish the book!

I'm almost done with it also. It's the first time in a long time that I've read the book before the movie.

This story sets up to be pretty good movie wise. I'm sure there will be liberties taken, but seems like they could stay pretty damn close to the source material.

Just from looking at the cast it seems we won't get much of the "birth of the FBI" side but that might be ok. Lots of good actors (& musicians) in this one so I'm pretty excited for it.


ETA: Found from the internet
quote:

In January 2023, Gladstone said that the input of the Osage Nation greatly changed the film from what Scorsese had originally envisioned and that their collaboration had positively affected the film, stating in an interview at the 2023 Sundance Film Festival that "The work is better when you let the world inform your work

quote:

Frequent Scorsese collaborator Robbie Robertson of The Band composed the score,[48] which critics have described as "old-timey",[49] "bluesy",[48] and "percussive".[50] The film also features a soundtrack of popular music from the 1920s and Native American songs.[48] It was Robertson's final completed film score before he died in August 2023.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 12:57 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108014 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I'm almost done with it also. It's the first time in a long time that I've read the book before the movie.


With the book set up in parts (Part 1: What happened and the investigation at the time, Part 2: When the bureau comes in (and White’s background), Part 3: The modern day writer and the story beyond Mollie and Co.) I’m curious as to what they’ll portray on the screen. Part 1 will be the easiest to translate but the intricacies of who all is involved and the aftermath could get complicated.
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5194 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Part 1 will be the easiest to translate but the intricacies of who all is involved and the aftermath could get complicated.

Yeah, that makes sense. I feel like Part 2 with White's background will take the biggest hit but who knows. It has a 206 minute run time.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108014 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Yeah, that makes sense. I feel like Part 2 with White's background will take the biggest hit but who knows. It has a 206 minute run time.


That’s what I’m thinking as well. And with Scorsese saying he wants to work more from the lens of the Osage perspective, we may not get a lot of that background (and that’s ok, I think White’s character can be displayed in action).

I love that Jesse Plemons is playing White. That’s going to be a great fit I think.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 1:02 pm
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5194 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I love that Jesse Plemons is playing White. That’s going to be a great fit I think.

I thought the same thing. As I was reading the book, I kept wondering who would be able to play him and Jesse Plemons will do a great job. He has that low key serious tone that will probably work very well.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram