Started By
Message

re: History Channel releasing 20-part series on World War II, hosted by Tom Hanks...

Posted on 5/27/26 at 7:53 pm to
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43510 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 7:53 pm to
Also, any time I watch a war related documentary now I think of this:




It's so true
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6251 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

hosted by Tom Hanks

Posted by MSUDawg98
Bear the F Down
Member since Jan 2018
14033 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Was anybody else watched the first three episodes so far? It’s been ok but I have seen better. I am wondering how they how they are gonna do 20 parts for this. They are already on the siege of Britain by episode 2.
I learned one thing from those three hours... the Molatov visit to Germany. I hated how they skipped around. They went through the invasion of Poland and then backtracked to cover the treaty between Stalin and Hitler. Monday is Pearl Harbor. After promoting the series as stressing things not covered in decades, they're blowing past the embargo and diplomacy. E04 should be about the build up to Pearl Harbor with E05 covering new ground (the Japs missing the carriers/the breakdown of communication at the top of the DOW/the sailors who just spent all night with the ladies).

If E04-06 are a repeat of E01-03, all of the build up to this was complete bullshite. Just the same stories with a famous movie star narrating. The EP credits on this makes Jon Meacham an absolute joke of an unbiased "historian".
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71549 posts
Posted on 5/28/26 at 12:18 am to
Yeah...I've seen mixed reviews about this. I feel like The World at War is a much better series. Not only that, instead of talking heads, you actually get first person accounts because the witnesses were still alive to be interviewed.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157084 posts
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Has anybody else watched the first three episodes so far? It’s been ok but I have seen better. I am wondering how they how they are gonna do 20 parts for this. They are already on the siege of Britain by episode 2.

That is sort of my concern with this. 20 episodes is a fricking TON, and a hell of a time commitment. And apparently I missed that it came out this past weekend, and I'm already three episodes behind.

I still have the KB WWII doc sitting in my living room waiting to watch it. Is this new one something that should be required viewing for someone into history, or is it just another WWII doc..?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85252 posts
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

But snowflakes always have to have their safe space


You saying this while crying about someone else’s opinion in this thread is peak.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85252 posts
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:42 am to
Seems like WWII has been well covered already. What more is there to say?
Posted by rich4pres
Knoxville
Member since Dec 2016
11366 posts
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Is this new one something that should be required viewing for someone into history, or is it just another WWII doc..?

Definitely not required viewing so far. There has been nothing new that I can remember. It is just ok.
Posted by rich4pres
Knoxville
Member since Dec 2016
11366 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 6:03 pm to
Ok, I think we’ve been sleeping on this after the first three episodes were just ok. This series is actually pretty good. The following episodes are things that are not overly covered in other WWII documentaries. I’m enjoying this.
Posted by Bayou Warrior 64
Member since Feb 2021
1125 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 6:32 pm to
Agreed! As another poster stated who would have ever thought that the History Channel would ever have shown a history show again.
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
7688 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 8:07 pm to
I started watching, watch one episode a night and finished up Ep. 2 tonight. Anyone heard of any of these historians, experts, and professors? Are they legit? I only recognize the GOAT Dan Carlin.
Posted by rich4pres
Knoxville
Member since Dec 2016
11366 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:49 pm to
I might be the only one here still watching this but it is really really good. It has been one of my favorite WW2 documentaries so far. It goes into a ton of detail that isn’t necessarily covered in other documentaries. Like I have stated earlier, the first three episodes are weak and generic but then it really picks up. They just showed episode 16 of 20. I highly encourage people to check this out. It’s been fantastic.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
56817 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:02 pm to
On episode 14
I’ve enjoyed it
Learned some things I’ve never heard about
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
3638 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:28 pm to
I have been watching a few episodes here and there trying to let it build up. I agree ,it has been a great series. Lots of cool details
Posted by WickedTiger
Member since Apr 2026
146 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:46 am to
Cut out Hanks, and it’s a definite watch.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11749 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:

A 20 part doc showing the complete picture would be interesting.


Have you not seen The World at War?
Posted by vistajay
Member since Oct 2012
2913 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:12 pm to
Been watching it evenings when I am cooking dinner. Great series. It is shaming me though, as an American History major from college. So many details I never knew.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
14319 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 3:25 pm to
Most enlightening one I've seen was about B-29s in China. I thought they were pretty much only used from Tinian, etc
Posted by PuertoRicanBlaze
Book Board Admin
Member since Apr 2024
7664 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Hanks is a major benefactor of the World War II museum. I think the work he has done supporting veterans causes speaks for itself. I’m pretty sure he’s pro America. Meanwhile, if you look around this thread…


Nothing screams "pro-America" like some rich celebrity victimizing a country that was twice as "bigoted" as Americans were and also sided with the Nazis... oh, and were responsible for the death of nearly 2,500 Americans... on U.S. soil.

Yeah, look around this fricking thread...
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 3:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram