
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gunn no longer running DC Studios.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 4:53 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 11/10/26 at 4:53 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Gunn’s “Superman,” starring David Corenswet — the duo’s first big swing as bosses — was touted as a hit with $618 million against a $225 million budget. Those ticket sales were promising enough, given the general decline in popularity of comic book movies. But they didn’t necessarily signal the kind of lasting enthusiasm that spawns an interconnected universe. Momentum all but evaporated with July’s money-loser “Supergirl,” which flopped with $126 million globally against a $170 million budget. And while October’s “Clayface” performed modestly with $109 million against a $44 million budget, sources suggest the body-horror thriller won’t break even until the studio factors in downstream revenues.
Insiders have raised eyebrows at Gunn and Safran’s decision to focus on lesser-known characters, like Superman’s cousin Kara El-Zor, aka Supergirl, and the Batman villain Clayface, rather than building out the franchise with marquee names. Although superhero movies have been hit or miss, the ones that spotlight notable characters can still pack a box-office punch. July’s “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” became the third-biggest movie in history with $2.5 billion, and December’s “Avengers: Endgame,” which brings back just about all of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes, could challenge the web-slinging Marvel sequel’s box office records.
“The industry has taken away the wrong lessons from Marvel’s success,” a studio insider tells Variety. “Higher budgets don’t equal quality storytelling.”
quote:
The pair will remain involved with DC, though with less authority. Gunn is directing next summer’s “Superman: Man of Tomorrow,” and the two are producing the 2027 television series “The People v. Gorilla Grodd,” with Skyler Gisondo as his “Superman” character Jimmy Olsen and Jimmy Tatro as Gorilla Grodd, and another season of “Creature Commandos.”
It’s unclear what will become of Gunn and Safran’s decade-long creative strategy of sequels, spinoffs and stand-alone stories.
quote:
Internally, there’s hope that Latcham — an executive who helped shape the MCU — will get back to basics with DC.
“Jeremy is the kind of guy who would go to Comic-Con to get an autograph from someone,” says another source, “not someone who wants to be there signing autographs.”
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/10/26 at 5:46 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
DC Studios Exit: James Gunn and Peter Safran Spent Big, Lost Money and Didn't Hook Audiences
When variety writes this headline you know you messed up
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:00 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Didn't even realize that they played themselves by portraying a white-dominated world as ideal. No one who watched that season would honestly come away thinking, "you know what? I actually prefer our world to that one."
Really? a fictional world that placed any and everyone who isn't white in concentration camps. And you believe no one would prefer our world over that world? That is just idiotic.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:07 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's just impossible to explain Superman without the obvious midwestern Christian influence. The entire point is this is a super-powered alien who is good solely because he was raised with sound, conservative, Christian fundamentals
I would say Gunn absolutely nailed Superman's character. There's nothing inherently Christian or Conservative about Superman. He's just a man with God-like powers, who doesn't see himself as a God. He is simply, a good person with a pure heart who wants to help and protect others. Gunn nailed all of that.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:21 pm to QJenk
quote:Christian, I am not sure
There's nothing inherently Christian or Conservative about Superman.
But conservative?
Nothing inherently conservative about the guy who was raised on a farm in Smallville, Kansas to Ma and Pa Kent?
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:25 pm to Roaad
quote:
Nothing inherently conservative about the guy who was raised on a farm in Smallville, Kansas to Ma and Pa Kent?
quote:
who wants to help and protect others
Helping the community at large? Everybody just taking handouts from Superman.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:54 pm to Fun Bunch
No shite. Marvel is doing an Avengers movie with Doom as the main villain. Meanwhile James Gunn was talking about doing a polka dot man show.
It’s clear he was in over his head and didn’t have a clue
It’s clear he was in over his head and didn’t have a clue
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 11/10/26 at 6:57 pm to Godzilla jr
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:08 pm to Roaad
quote:
Nothing inherently conservative about the guy who was raised on a farm in Smallville, Kansas to Ma and Pa Kent?
Correct. The political leanings of the Kents are irrelevant. Them being genuinely good people who raised a young alien boy to fall in love with humanity is the important part.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:40 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
If Gunn had taken what he had done with Superman, and also done it with:
Batman
Wonder Woman
Flash
Green Lantern
Nightwing
etc etc etc
He would still be in charge
But instead he was like I am going to make a Superman movie and then all of these weird projects
Yeah its just so bizarre. I think you need decision makers to make the decisions about what to make and creative types to produce the media. You cant make give creative types the keys
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:54 pm to QJenk
quote:
I would say Gunn absolutely nailed Superman's character. There's nothing inherently Christian or Conservative about Superman. He's just a man with God-like powers, who doesn't see himself as a God. He is simply, a good person with a pure heart who wants to help and protect others. Gunn nailed all of that.
Thank you for proving that you, too, should have nothing to do with writing a Superman anything.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:56 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
it's being reported that Latcham was in talks to take over while Paramount was buying WB, so anything Ellison said or promised while taking over Warner can be dismissed. He knew he was firing Gunn while he said he was keeping him.
This is...bad?
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:00 pm to Jay Are
quote:
Helping the community at large? Everybody just taking handouts from Superman.
You do understand that conservatives help the community personally, and liberals vote for the government to take from others to help the community.
Right? You do know that's the difference, surely. We don't have to explain that here in this thread?
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:05 pm to imjustafatkid
The wheels were in motion about a month ago while Gunn and Safran thought they were safe
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:41 pm to red sox fan 13
quote:
Maybe this is a hot take but DC needs to stop trying to make a shared universe happen. You don’t need to be Marvel. No DCU, no DCEU, just use your stacked roster to tell good stories and make great one-off films.
What's crazy is, if you do a couple good one-offs and they work, you can absolutely do a shared universe. That's how Marvel opened.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:44 pm to Jay Are
quote:
Helping the community at large? Everybody just taking handouts from Superman.
Encapsulation of a backwards mind
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:46 pm to Fun Bunch
Ellison isn’t so conservative after all. Seems he’s pro-Gunn control!
Ha!

Ha!
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:14 pm to QJenk
quote:
would say Gunn absolutely nailed Superman's character. There's nothing inherently Christian or Conservative about Superman. He's just a man with God-like powers, who doesn't see himself as a God. He is simply, a good person with a pure heart who wants to help and protect others.
He's a defender of good societal norms and a metaphor for Christ the Lion
You can choose to view him in a secular fashion but you lose a bunch of deeper allegory.
His fiercest opponent is a prideful intellect named Luthor. Of course some iterations villanize Lex for his greed which an acceptable criticism for both modern progressives and traditional Christianity.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:33 pm to Godzilla jr
Or a Jimmy Olsen and Gorilla Grodd TV series…. Fool no one wants that dog Sh**. Stick to the IP that made/makes the brand famous.
Supergirl did not earn her own movie before Batman or WW….. what were they thinking???
I did like Superman but it could have been a bit darker …. So in between MOS and this version of Superman is my happy place with the character……
Supergirl did not earn her own movie before Batman or WW….. what were they thinking???
I did like Superman but it could have been a bit darker …. So in between MOS and this version of Superman is my happy place with the character……

Popular
Back to top


2













