- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Doctor Who Tonight
Posted on 4/15/17 at 10:29 am
Posted on 4/15/17 at 10:29 am
Series 10 on BBCA. Yssss
2
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:43 pm to jagwareagle
I love Capaldi as the Doctor but I'll miss Clara and am more than a little skeptical about the new companions.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 4:23 pm to lagallifrey
I heard she's solid.
I can't wait for Moffat to hand over the reigns of the show.
I can't wait for Moffat to hand over the reigns of the show.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:10 am to timbo
Ya know, I didn't feel it. I've seen positive reviews almost everywhere, yet most comments are rather blah or negative. I don't get the love - a few hints of old shows (like the pics and the different screwdrivers) don't really have the power they once did to me.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:26 am to Bham4Tide
I've never gotten into Capaldi. And the writing since he took the role has been too meta for my taste. First episode looks like it'll be continuing that way. And I'll still watch.
Moffat has done some amazing work, but I'm also interested in seeing someone new take over.
Moffat has done some amazing work, but I'm also interested in seeing someone new take over.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:08 am to PowerTool
Didn't care for it at all, or for the new companion.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:39 am to lagallifrey
Same here. Story line was lacking. New companion doesn't have any chemistry. I do like Nardol. A bi-racial lesbian? Taking the social justice Warrior to a new level.
Anyone catch the spin off show? I dvr'd the show and missed it.
Anyone catch the spin off show? I dvr'd the show and missed it.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:51 am to lagallifrey
I'm not a fan of the new doctor
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:52 am to Aubie Spr96
I might be done with this show now
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:57 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Same here. Story line was lacking. New companion doesn't have any chemistry. I do like Nardol. A bi-racial lesbian? Taking the social justice Warrior to a new level.
Most companions lately have been LGBT in one way or another (river song, captain jack, lizard lady and girl, even Clara at times). They had to up the ante.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 11:01 am to lagallifrey
quote:
even Clara at times
Wait, what'd I miss?
Posted on 4/16/17 at 11:02 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Anyone catch the spin off show? I dvr'd the show and missed it.
FYI, it's all but dead. Unless it gets massive ratings in the US, it's not getting a second season.
On yesterday's episode:
- Not sold on Bill
- Had a feeling as soon as the name was announced that she'd be a lesbian. So brave, BBC.
- I still don't know why they brought Matt Lucas back. Unless we're getting Alfie Boe in an episode, this seems kind of stupid.
- I still love Capaldi
Posted on 4/16/17 at 11:03 am to PowerTool
Just a couple of throwaway references she made about it. I remember she supposedly made out with Jane Austen of all people.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 12:48 pm to lagallifrey
Who else misses Rose?
Posted on 4/16/17 at 2:02 pm to LordSnow
I may hate this companion worse than Rose. I'll give it some more time. Maybe it'll come around.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 2:05 pm to LordSnow
quote:
Who else misses Rose?
Up until last night she was the worst modern companion.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 2:07 pm to lagallifrey
Tough crowd 
But this reminds me of a tangential thought I had. Hopefully the introduction of an openly gay companion means Moffat is taking a break from exploring all of the amazing complications of romantic attachment between mortals and immortals. In case yall didn't get the point, it's really complicated.
But this reminds me of a tangential thought I had. Hopefully the introduction of an openly gay companion means Moffat is taking a break from exploring all of the amazing complications of romantic attachment between mortals and immortals. In case yall didn't get the point, it's really complicated.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 6:07 pm to PowerTool
quote:
But this reminds me of a tangential thought I had. Hopefully the introduction of an openly gay companion means Moffat is taking a break from exploring all of the amazing complications of romantic attachment between mortals and immortals. In case yall didn't get the point, it's really complicated.
Why can't they be friends without diddling each other or one is gay? The BBC is either cramming interracial couples or gay characters as the norm.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 6:21 pm to stinkdawg
quote:
The BBC is either cramming interracial couples
FFS. Over here, interracial dating isn't even an afterthought. There's definitely an agenda behind the gay thing (they've admitted as much), but there's no agenda behind the interracial thing.
This post was edited on 4/16/17 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 4/16/17 at 7:13 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
FFS. Over here, interracial dating isn't even an afterthought. There's definitely an agenda behind the gay thing (they've admitted as much), but there's no agenda behind the interracial thing.
True but the guy who posted that time traveled from the 1950's, back when it was illegal to marry interracially.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News