- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Disney's Snow White "Best live action remake in years" | 74% Popcornmeter
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:07 am to SoFla Tideroller
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:07 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
There is no way the movie can convince anyone that Rachel Zegler is such a transcendent beauty that Gal Gadot is murderously jealous.
I dunno. Women can be crazily insecure. Just because GG is objectively more attractive doesn't mean that she couldn't be concerned about it.
0
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:19 am to Corinthians420
The problem for the film is the damage is already done. Box office gurus are saying presales show an opening weekend between 35-40 mil right now. That would be very bad.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:42 am to St Augustine
quote:So . . .gays?
for a modern audience
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:01 am to Corinthians420
quote:
Im no rocket scientologist but that doesnt appear to be the same guy
Generally when someone reposts something they agree with that take wholeheartedly
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:05 am to Corinthians420
i'm sure a website called "DisInsider" is completely objective and is probably full of negative reviews for the many Disney and Marvel flops
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:15 am to Corinthians420
quote:
Rachel Zegler is an enchanting lead, all the story tweaks work well for a modern audience
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:19 am to Proximo
quote:
Generally when someone reposts something they agree with that take wholeheartedly
He probably does agree with him, but saying he was "REAL mad" just because he reposted something seems like a stretch. Also I think the libsoftiktok account kinda proves that reposting something doesnt mean you agree with it wholeheartedly
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:28 am to Roaad
quote:
So . . .gays?
I can't speak for all of us, but I have zero interest in seeing this movie.
I'd imagine the majority of viewership will be young girls with their moms.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:30 am to Corinthians420
quote:
Those hellbent on finding faults are going to struggle
Everyone meet Skyler, Skyler has never been on the internet.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:42 am to Corinthians420
Still won't watch.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:44 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Those hellbent on finding faults are going to struggle
Everyone meet Skyler, Skyler has never been on the internet
for real. As evidenced by the folks latching onto "adapted for a modern audience"
The last Disney version was released in 1937, its safe to say the audiences were very different even if you only count the normal mother-daughter viewers.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:49 am to Scruffy
not sure I would insult SEK like that Scruffy
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:00 am to Thracken13
quote:
not sure I would insult SEK like that Scruffy
He should take it as a compliment.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:15 am to Scruffy
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:23 am to Corinthians420
I don't doubt that the movie is "good". How could you screw it up in the first place? That is the real challenge. The story is as straightforward as it gets.
Does the lousy PR keep girls and their moms, gays, and fat Disney women from making this a success?
Does the lousy PR keep girls and their moms, gays, and fat Disney women from making this a success?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:28 am to skullhawk
quote:
How could you screw it up in the first place? That is the real challenge. The story is as straightforward as it gets.
quote:
The original cartoon came out in 1937 and very evidently so. There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird. So we didn't do that this time. We have a different approach to what I'm sure a lot of people will assume is a love story just because we cast a guy in the movie, Andrew Burnap, great dude. But it's really not about her love story at all, which is really, really wonderful. All of Andrew’s scenes could get cut, who knows? It’s Hollywood, baby!
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:35 am to Sam Quint
quote:
The original cartoon came out in 1937 and very evidently so. There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird. So we didn't do that this time. We have a different approach to what I'm sure a lot of people will assume is a love story just because we cast a guy in the movie, Andrew Burnap, great dude. But it's really not about her love story at all, which is really, really wonderful. All of Andrew’s scenes could get cut, who knows? It’s Hollywood, baby!
They did a ton of reshoots and added alot of CGI since that dumbass opened her mouth. I think the backlash forced Disney to make a decent movie.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:44 am to Corinthians420
quote:
all the story tweaks work well for a modern audience
and there it is
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:05 am to Corinthians420
The only Disney remakes that I've seen were The Jungle Book and Beauty and the Beast (because the originals were so important to myself and my kids). I've passed on the rest, but this praise (or promotion) has me intrigued enough to test this movie out (at least through the first Gadot scene).
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:39 am to Corinthians420
quote:
"Best live action remake in years"
Every one I've seen has been some level of bad.
Page 2 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News