- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Disney Seeks Original IPs to Win Back Gen-Z Men
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:13 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:13 pm to LNCHBOX
Is it that hard for him to admit that it was a Nike campaign reused/crossbranded to promote girl boss power specifically relating to film industry/Star Wars?
The fact that it's a bunch of entertainment industry women - some specifically related to SW IP - in front of film festival backdrops doesn't give it away?
The fact that it's a bunch of entertainment industry women - some specifically related to SW IP - in front of film festival backdrops doesn't give it away?
0
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:14 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Says the genius saying the force is female in the context of that specific photo was not directly related to fricking Star Wars and the culture war going on at that time.
They definitely included Kathleen Kennedy in the photo and got her a shirt because of who she was and her relation to star wars.
That was never the argument.
The Head of ASG Elizabeth English knew of the Nike "The Force is Female" air force 1 ad campaign, hired Kathleen Kennedy. Nike provides shirts for everyone and probably donates some $$$ to the school.
They all wore the shirts for the event.
And it all would have died right then if not for ragebait grifters jumping online to whine about how Disney/Kathleen Kennedy came up with that slogan as a frick you to male star wars fans.
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:27 pm to Lacreus
quote:
Disney will never be the same company they were from 1995-2012
the inmates are running the asylum over there
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:41 pm to RLDSC FAN
They're going to find the next great boy IP available for sale, overpay for it, and within weeks convince themselves it needs to be "broadened" (giggity) to appeal to girls, which will be an expensive debacle over the following 5 to 10 years.
(Ask me how I know...)
(Ask me how I know...)
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:54 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
They're going to find the next great boy IP available for sale, overpay for it, and within weeks convince themselves it needs to be "broadened" (giggity) to appeal to girls, which will be an expensive debacle over the following 5 to 10 years.
(Ask me how I know...)
Hollywood wants to TRANS all the little boys. Put them in dresses and makeup.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 3:57 pm to RLDSC FAN
Haven't read through the whole thread, but the major foolishness is trying to take things designed to appeal to boys and have them also appeal to girls.
I'm not sure if ya'll remember being say, an 8 year old boy, but young boys and teen boys very aggressively avoid anything they perceive as "for girls"
Which is one of the biggest reasons historically that most toys and media were very clearly either tailored for boys or girls. Girls had their My Little Ponies and Barbies, boys had their GI Joes and TMNT. Almost no cross over. Even toys both sexes liked, say something like Legos, had sets very clearly for boys (castles and pirates) and sets very clearly for girls (pet shops and salons)
The social engineering tards don't like this because they believe everything is an artificial "social construct" and are on a crusade to mass androgynous/feminize everything but biological sex is real as are the preferences it drives.
Making products that appeal to male tastes has become forbidden in our society. Everything traditionally men have liked has had to change to be more "inclusive" for women. Stop denying 50% of the audience what they want. Make stuff primarily designed for boys and men to enjoy again.
I'm not sure if ya'll remember being say, an 8 year old boy, but young boys and teen boys very aggressively avoid anything they perceive as "for girls"
Which is one of the biggest reasons historically that most toys and media were very clearly either tailored for boys or girls. Girls had their My Little Ponies and Barbies, boys had their GI Joes and TMNT. Almost no cross over. Even toys both sexes liked, say something like Legos, had sets very clearly for boys (castles and pirates) and sets very clearly for girls (pet shops and salons)
The social engineering tards don't like this because they believe everything is an artificial "social construct" and are on a crusade to mass androgynous/feminize everything but biological sex is real as are the preferences it drives.
Making products that appeal to male tastes has become forbidden in our society. Everything traditionally men have liked has had to change to be more "inclusive" for women. Stop denying 50% of the audience what they want. Make stuff primarily designed for boys and men to enjoy again.
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 8/21/25 at 4:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
“Disney seeks original IPs to destroy”
Fixed it for you
Fixed it for you
Posted on 8/21/25 at 4:27 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
Making products that appeal to male tastes has become forbidden in our society.
come on bruh there's no way you actually believe that. It's one thing to recognize dumb shite, it's another thing to act like you are being persecuted.
This years top movies include stuff like
F1
Mission Impossible
28 Years Later
Not to mention do you really think Happy Gilmore 2 and The Naked Gun weren't designed to appeal to male tastes?
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 8/21/25 at 4:35 pm to Triple Bogey
quote:
They started trying to shoehorn all of these subliminal gay characters/messages in every one of their kid focused movies. I'm not taking my kid to see that shite no matter how small of piece of the movie it is.
I haven’t taken mine to any since light year on largely because of this but also because they just seem like shite.
No idea how they don’t just correct course.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 4:36 pm to St Augustine
They’re being paid not to and now that Fink is co chair of the WEF get ready for more of this shite from Disney
Posted on 8/21/25 at 4:56 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
Not to mention do you really think Happy Gilmore 2 and The Naked Gun weren't designed to appeal to male tastes?
Wow, it only took about a decade of nonstop shitting all over men for them to throw us a bone. You really showed us with your dumbass argument.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:19 pm to OMLandshark
They’re also not Disney properties. Don’t fall into the deflections
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:29 pm to Madking
quote:
They’re also not Disney properties. Don’t fall into the deflections
That dude didn't say anything about Disney.
He said
quote:
Making products that appeal to male tastes has become forbidden in our society.
That's retarded when you can buy Sidney Sweeney's bath water soap from Dr. Squatch.
What the hell made you guys so beta and defeated? get out there and do your own thing and don't let others tell you what you can't do.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:32 pm to Madking
quote:
They’re also not Disney properties. Don’t fall into the deflections
That’s all the clown has.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:36 pm to OMLandshark
whatever, knock yourself out crying about how miserable your life is as a man. I'm sure that will make it better.
Or go get you a sex change and enjoy your fake periods. I don't give a shite.
Or go get you a sex change and enjoy your fake periods. I don't give a shite.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:38 pm to Corinthians420
Thanks for proving my point. The thread is about Disney which is what he’s referring to so you deflected and are now doing it again with the Sydney Sweeney non sequitur. You’ve also lied about people not panning Rings of Power when there are multiple, extended threads of posters pointing out how bad it is and of course the continued, debunked narrative about The Force is Female when it’s been proven multiple times that Kennedy’s husband, who’s worked with Nike for years, took the idea to Nike after Kennedy and her pals had already started it. You’re just a complete liar.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:39 pm to OMLandshark
Disney apologists crack me up.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:42 pm to Madking
quote:
The thread is about Disney
the post I responded to said IN OUR SOCIETY. You should learn to read.
quote:
You’ve also lied about people not panning Rings of Power when there are multiple, extended threads
new threads weekly like we get with Disney/Star Wars? bullshite. we haven't had a rings of power thread since February 4th.
quote:
it’s been proven multiple times that Kennedy’s husband, who’s worked with Nike for years
he actually last worked with Nike in 2011. 6 years before the Force is Female ad campaign.
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:43 pm to roadGator
quote:
Disney apologists crack me up.
beta cucks crack me up
how many years are yall gonna cry about Disney?
Posted on 8/21/25 at 5:43 pm to Corinthians420
Disney is a company, Rings of Power is a seasonal show. Again being intellectually dishonest
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News