- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Christopher Nolan - Interstellar
Posted on 1/5/22 at 4:57 pm to WicKed WayZ
Posted on 1/5/22 at 4:57 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
People normally shite all over Nolan on here after praising him for years
Loved his movies at first.
Watching them 5 years later, not so much. I can't stand inception now.
Interstellar and Batman Begins are the only ones I still like.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 5:42 pm to USMCguy121
quote:
Great fricking movie. That said i turn on subtitles. I actually watch 99% of my movies with subtitles now simply because I hate missing shite
It started with having loud arse kids and not wanting to miss anything, and now I have subtitles on for everything except live sports.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 5:58 pm to alpinetiger
One of my favorite movies. Never had an issue hearing any of the dialogue.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 6:06 pm to Jax Teller
quote:
It's my favorite movie ever. It hits every point I enjoy in a movie. Science, Space, Mathematics, Score, Love Story, etc.
I fricking love a good ole fashioned romantic math movie.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 6:07 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It’s one of my two qualms with the film. I personally think Dr Mann should have been played by Bryan Cranston who can come off as nonthreatening and affable one second to terrifying and horrific on a dime. I don’t buy that Matt Damon could convince 12 other people to go on a suicide mission with him, but I do buy it from Walter White.
So you buy Ann Hathaway being so in love with Bryan Cranston that she fricks everybody out of years of their lives to be with him?
Posted on 1/5/22 at 6:10 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
So you buy Ann Hathaway being so in love with Bryan Cranston that she fricks everybody out of years of their lives to be with him?
Ann Hathaway's lover was on the third planet, not Dr Mann's. What are you talking about?
Posted on 1/5/22 at 6:16 pm to OMLandshark
quote:Thank you for bringing this up. I don't think they chose her lover's planet. From the dialog I thought it was the other planet not chosen? I'll have to watch again.
Ann Hathaway's lover was on the third planet, not Dr Mann's. What are you talking about?
This post was edited on 1/5/22 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 7:02 pm to OMLandshark
My apologies. It wasn’t Mann she was in love with? I guess they did go there 2nd, though. Still, you think Ann Hathaway would be in love with Bryan Cranston at all? 
Posted on 1/5/22 at 7:15 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The other is they should have had a better excuse to go down to the water planet first, and it could be just as simple as the scientist down there finding algae and it’s atmosphere was nearly perfectly synced with the Earth of old. Common sense would say first go the Mann’s, then Brandt’s lovers, and the water planet last since that just burns up tons of time.
you missed something in the movie because that is partly their reasoning for picking it, it had promising data to support human life, and the other planets were much further away which is riskier for their mission. brand and edmund were in love so that threw out scientific objectivity picking that planet and it was the furthest away. I think they miscalculated how close the black hole was or their post tidal wave evacuation caused them to stay on the water planet longer burning more time than they expected.
a quote from the movie.
quote:
Dr Mann's data is promising, but it's gonna take us months to get there, and Edmund's is even further. Miller hasn't sent much, but what she has sent is very promising. It's water, it's organics... And think about the resources including time that would be spent trying to get back here.
quote:
EDIT: Also third qualm: Cooper sending himself there. That creates a paradox. He could still send Murph the codes that she solves later as well as the STAY message, but he could not have given himself the coordinates to NASA since he wouldn’t have been there in the first place. Just have the planned original pilot of the mission die of something and Cooper is now the only guy that can fly the craft.
this is a tough paradox. the dust was already being influenced to collect forming a message for murph/cooper even before he even got nasa coordinates, they had been studying dust collection 'ghosts' for a while.
I think an explanation involves some timeline frickery... plan B succeeds with the original pilot that cooper replaces and future 5d people advance enough to where they can influence things in the past. they could have been diverting the dust for messages to send the coordinates/messages initially, at least until coop can arrive to send them to himself to allow plan A to succeed. he does also send the coordinates from the tessaract - outside of space-time which probably backdoors the bootstrap paradox.
or I kinda like the response coop himself gave when trying to dock the endurance 'its not possible --- no its necessary'
or that its just love is all powerful thru space-time idk.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 7:24 pm to USMCguy121
quote:
Great fricking movie. That said i turn on subtitles. I actually watch 99% of my movies with subtitles
I’ve seen it several times, but last week, I talked my daughter into watching it. She loved it. We turned on the subtitles this time (never done it), I got a whole new view of the movie.
This post was edited on 1/5/22 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 7:28 pm to AMS
quote:
you missed something in the movie because that is partly their reasoning for picking it, it had promising data to support human life, and the other planets were much further away which is riskier for their mission.
This doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The plan was to be there for seven years even though it would feel like a half an hour to the crew. Mann’s planet was 3 months away while Brandt’s boyfriend was a year away. If both of those fail, you can still arrive back at the water planet in time before the crew planned on returning in the movie. This is something that just doesn’t add up. The logical path was Mann’s (Mann being a coward chose this planet intentionally thinking they’d go to his first if he failed), then Brandt’s, and then the water planet as a last resort. Instead of that taking an estimated 10 years, they just blew it.
quote:
I think they miscalculated how close the black hole was or their post tidal wave evacuation caused them to stay on the water planet longer burning more time than they expected.
They correctly calculated how much Gargantua would warp time, so I don’t think they made this error.
quote:
this is a tough paradox. the dust was already being influenced to collect forming a message for murph/cooper even before he even got nasa coordinates, they had been studying dust collection 'ghosts' for a while.
Here’s the problem with Cooper sending the NASA coordinates to himself: he wouldn’t have been in the situation he was in if he was left to his own devices. You can narrowly push your past self in a direction you were going in already, but nothing to that extreme. Cooper would have gone regardless of the STAY or finding the constant in Gargantua, but it’s impossible for him to tell himself to go somewhere he wouldn’t have gone. The only path I can see is another Cooper from another reality gets into the Tesseract and then gives Cooper the coordinates which our Cooper then repeats himself years later. Interstellar follows LOST time travel logic on whatever happened happened. Like in LOST Faraday is able to influence his mother on events that would happen to him, but not directly himself.
This post was edited on 1/5/22 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 8:07 pm to DrSteveBrule
I love Inception. Interstellar is great too. I bet Hans Zimmer gets excited every time Nolan gets a new film going. That’s (Hans Zimmer) one of my most played radio stations on Pandora. It helps me concentrate when I’m coding.
This post was edited on 1/5/22 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:00 pm to OMLandshark
I'll jump in here with this graphic that is the best explanation of the paradox I have ever seen.
MAKING SENSE OF INTERSTELLAR’S PLOT
There's a bunch of other stuff explained in the article leading to this conclusion:
MAKING SENSE OF INTERSTELLAR’S PLOT
There's a bunch of other stuff explained in the article leading to this conclusion:
quote:
The Tesseract sent the NASA coordinates to Cooper the very first time, which led to the events where they found themselves in the Tesseract. Remember, the Tesseract is an AI built with the purpose of making small changes to the timeline of the beings, in order to save humanity from the future that the beings once occupied.
Having chosen Cooper and Murphy, the Tesseract sends the first NASA coordinates to Cooper. The coordinates given to Cooper by the Tesseract changed humanity’s timeline a second time (the wormhole was the first change) and made Cooper go on the mission with NASA.
This post was edited on 1/5/22 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:05 pm to alpinetiger
Don’t care what anyone says but Interstellar and Inception are two of the greatest achievements in film this century.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:16 pm to dallastiger55
I love this video that shows how Nolan inspired Hans Zimmer to write the music for Interstellar.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:17 pm to alpinetiger
It’s top 3 for me. Stupid tesseract scene keeps it out of #1.
I absolutely love everything about it outside of that.
On the other hand, I have never once struggled with Nolan’s dialogue in a single movie. When people complain I never pick up on it.
I absolutely love everything about it outside of that.
On the other hand, I have never once struggled with Nolan’s dialogue in a single movie. When people complain I never pick up on it.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:21 pm to 3nOut
quote:
On the other hand, I have never once struggled with Nolan’s dialogue in a single movie. When people complain I never pick up on it.
Seen Tenet? I didn’t understand a single word Kenneth Branagh said.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:29 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Seen Tenet? I didn’t understand a single word Kenneth Branagh said.
Yep. 0 issues. The worst thing is Hardy’s dialogue in tDKR. Other than that I’ve literally never had a problem with a single word from his movies.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:31 pm to meeple
I just still can’t make sense of it. STAY and Plan A work for me, but Nolan just overly complicated it with Coop sending himself to the NASA base when such an easy solution was viable: just have NASA come to him. The pilot dies from whatever cause and Cooper is the only one who can now do it and they have an extremely limited launch window since they have to slingshot off of Mars and Jupiter towards Saturn. And I’m a person who understands this 5th dimensional shite, so I can’t imagine how confusing it is for the 95% of people that don’t.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 9:33 pm to 3nOut
quote:
Yep. 0 issues. The worst thing is Hardy’s dialogue in tDKR. Other than that I’ve literally never had a problem with a single word from his movies.
Kudos, since I was with you until that movie where I finally understood what people criticizing Nolan were bitching about, but Kenneth Branagh… I was so lost in that movie. I still don’t understand that movie, and I don’t think it’s because I’m stupid, I just think Nolan went too far up his own arse in that.
Popular
Back to top


1







