- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/15/16 at 6:23 pm to jefforize
quote:
BB2 Nicole
Danielle Reyes bb3
Posted on 9/15/16 at 6:23 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:no. He is joshing
People really thought she deserved it over Will?
Posted on 9/15/16 at 6:27 pm to Bamatab
quote:support
l they would have to do is let them watch the live feeds (which don't include the DR sessions). Hell, take away all of their board games and Netflix, and tell them their only entertainment is watching the live feeds.
Posted on 9/15/16 at 10:51 pm to Bamatab
quote:
Since voting started tonight, who is everyone voting for AFP? I'm going with Victor. The dude is a stand up guy, and seems to be really genuine and a decent dude.
I agree. You gotta be a comp beast or a social gamer in this game and he was def a comp beast. I wouldn't say his social game was great but he did hang out with everybody and was a pretty cool dude once he dropped that stupid act that production kept trying to force on him in the beginning. I also give him points for resisting a showmance, and cleaning up after everyone in the house, and being loyal.
Posted on 9/15/16 at 11:59 pm to Wolf
quote:
He'd be an idiot not to take James if he wins part 3.
It would be one of the biggest blunders in big brother history not to take James. James is pretty much useless in comps and doesn't even look like he's trying to win.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 8:14 am to tigerpimpbot
Would be as bad as Cody taking Derrick.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 8:49 am to kballa6
Today's schedule:
Real Time: HOH Part 2
On TV: Recap episode, HOH Part 1
Real Time: HOH Part 2
On TV: Recap episode, HOH Part 1
Posted on 9/16/16 at 8:50 am to GEAUXmedic
Posted on 9/16/16 at 8:52 am to VermilionTiger
So it's set in stone that James is making the finals now, right? There is no sane scenario where one of the others doesn't take him.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 9:07 am to FalseProphet
Nicole taking Paul would be even dumber than Cody taking Derrick. It looks like the already-wealthy Paul will be getting richer. However, he did play an incredible game
Posted on 9/16/16 at 10:00 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:
James is pretty much useless in comps and doesn't even look like he's trying to win.
That's because he's not trying. He's throwing comps left and right. Shits pretty funny that's he been forcing Paul to win HOHs and Vetos just so Paul can take James to the F2.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 10:06 am to FalseProphet
quote:
So it's set in stone that James is making the finals now, right? There is no sane scenario where one of the others doesn't take him.
Paul and Nicole have been saying to each other that James doesn't deserve to go, and that they are taking each other to final 2.
I can't believe that either of them are being truthful, but Paul seems like he might actually be serious about not taking James. I know that right before Corey left, Nicole told Corey that she'd take James because he'd be the easiest to beat. But that was several days ago, and Paul has been pounding it in her head that James doesn't deserve to go so who knows if she is actually succumbing to Paul's rhetoric.
Both of them would be absolute fools not to take him. But Paul's (and Victor's) biggest weakness in this game has been not to separate what the honorable move is and what the best move is to win the game. Nicole has proven that she can separate the honorable move and the best move, so I have a little more confidence that she'd actually take James.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 10:10 am to Bamatab
on a different note, if the final 3 was corey, nicole, and james and Nicole was the decider on who to take to final 2, who would she take? I know that supposedly her and james had a final 2 deal even before the show started, but obviously nicole buddied up pretty hard with corey.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 10:17 am to Bamatab
My personal opinion is he's been badmouthing James in the hopes that if Nicole wins she'll take Paul to the F2. I don't think he has any intention of taking her. I could be off base but I can't see him beating her with the jury vote.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 10:18 am to WG_Dawg
I never bought that her and James had a pre-show final 2. But even if they did, I'm pretty sure that she still would've taken Corey over James to final 2, just like James would've taken Nat to final 2 over Nicole.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 4:20 pm to Bamatab
Posted on 9/16/16 at 4:26 pm to Bamatab
I just dont think that is the right move for paul. He is making Nicole feel like she cant beat james even more over him. Saying he doesnt deserve to be there also means Jury wont vote for him.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 4:57 pm to wish i was tebow
Yeah, Paul doesn't understand moves based off of incentives (to steal a phrase from Vanessa). Paul and Vic were blindsided by Corey & Nicole because they didn't understand that them being so good at comps was a huge incentive for them to get put up on the block over a worthless James. If Paul & Vic would've understood that most people in the game make moves based on what is best for their end game, then they probably would've put Corey & Nicole up instead of Nat & James. Now Paul is telling Nicole that James doesn't deserve to go to final two because he hasn't done anything in this game, yet to me that would be a huge incentive for me to take James to final 2.
Paul said he stopped watching last season half way into it. Maybe he should've watched it to the end when Vanessa started harping on trusting people based off of incentives, and not just blind loyalty. Not only can you not afford to trust someone whose incentives don't match their perceived loyalty, but you also can't give other people incentives to do things that go against your best interests.
Paul said he stopped watching last season half way into it. Maybe he should've watched it to the end when Vanessa started harping on trusting people based off of incentives, and not just blind loyalty. Not only can you not afford to trust someone whose incentives don't match their perceived loyalty, but you also can't give other people incentives to do things that go against your best interests.
Posted on 9/16/16 at 7:24 pm to Bamatab
These millennials are all cryers
Page 412 of 426
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News