Started By
Message

re: Best part of the Office is when James Bond figures out Jim is a lazy shite slacker in 5 min

Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:28 am to
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6756 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:28 am to
quote:

quote: Throughout the show he screws multiple people over, Like who?




All I could come up with.
Posted by lagallifrey
Member since Dec 2013
2010 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Oh, typical argument from the Jim sympathist’s playbook! A real man would’ve had a conversation right then and there that decided that their default would not be prioritizing careers over each other. Pam might’ve owed Jim one, but Jim should’ve never allowed this dynamic to enter their relationship in the first place.


I assume you’re just having fun with the topic based on your comments here, which is fine, but I’ll go with it.

That would have been truly pathetic. Jim saw a great opportunity, which worked out beautifully for the family unlike Pam’s flaky attempts, and seized it. Meanwhile she was deciding whether to seize the nearest camera man.
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6501 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:07 am to
quote:

When Michael announces there's been a murder and Creed flees the scene


My favorite Creed moment is when he instinctively takes Dwight’s gun before Toby walks in

Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1664 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I assume you’re just having fun with the topic

Guilty, I am having fun, but I also genuinely dislike Jim.
Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1664 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Meanwhile she was deciding whether to seize the nearest camera man.

Wholeheartedly agree Pam is a scumbag too.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28836 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:19 am to
quote:


Throughout the show he screws multiple people over, sometimes for personal gain and sometimes for cheap amusement. He’s obviously a sadist, displayed through his torment of Dwight. In general I think he’s a self-serving, self-aggrandizing scumbag.


i think those midseasons around Charles Minor and Robert California the writers didn't know what to do with Jim and Pam as the starcrossed lovers that finally ended up together. in a group of people where they, Oscar, and Toby are the only normal ones, there wasn't much more to do then make them kinda assholes. i.e. Pam missing Michael's last day, Jim skipping work after getting dismissed from Jury Duty, etc.

that being said, Jim saved Dwight from getting the axe while getting rid of a toxic Todd Packer, avoided cheating with a naked woman in his room, was supportive of Andy, and gave Daryl a huge opportunity with Athleap/d.

Posted by lagallifrey
Member since Dec 2013
2010 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:35 am to
quote:

those midseasons around Charles Minor and Robert California the writers didn't know what to do with Jim and Pam as the starcrossed lovers that finally ended up together. in a group of people where they, Oscar, and Toby are the only normal ones, there wasn't much more to do then make them kinda a-holes. i.e. Pam missing Michael's last day, Jim skipping work after getting dismissed from Jury Duty, etc.


Charles Minor was a great period for the show.

But yeah after Michael left, the hole was too big for the writers to fill. Jim and Pam were helpful for the audience to have someone to relate to, but they are not what drove the show. The final few episodes are decent, but on the whole the show never found what it wanted to be without Michael.

Personally I think they should have committed to Dwight being boss for the remainder, because he’s just as much of a mess as Michael, and nearly as funny.
Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1664 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

avoided cheating with a naked woman in his room

ALLEGEDLY
quote:

in a group of people where they, Oscar, and Toby are the only normal ones

I acknowledge this is off-topic and I’m hijacking this thread (there should be a larger Office Theory 101 thread), but this is a huge gripe of mine. If you watch the earlier seasons, everyone was relatively normal save for Michael and Dwight. It made the whole environment that much more realistic and the litany of straight men worked as a more vivid foil to Michael and Dwight’s characters. I think it wasn’t the initial intention of the writers that once they continued on from the end of the British Office, they were to Flanderize all of the secondary characters. I do understand that the show wouldn’t have run as long without adding in the zany quirks to Kevin, Kelly, Angela, etc, but maybe that would’ve been ok...
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6501 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I think that’s a good measure of his character. He’s got an apathy that a young person idolizes. But that “too-cool-for-school” attitude eventually gets super annoying and makes him seem self-important.


This is what always annoyed me about Jim. Every office has one of them. He never realizes his full potential in a career, but instead of taking steps to better himself, he just resents his situation and everyone around him. He’s surrounded by decent, salt of the earth people, but he’s constantly complaining about them and looking for reasons to not hang out or form any meaningful relationships, all the while also hating the rut that he has carved out for himself.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
31812 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

He’s surrounded by decent, salt of the earth people, but he’s constantly complaining about them and looking for reasons to not hang out or form any meaningful relationships, all the while also hating the rut that he has carved out for himself.



Yep.

I mean Jim’s biggest problem with Dwight is that Dwight legitimately cares and works hard at his job.

Sure the guys weird and at the point of the show he’s writing jim up to hr but Jim is mentally torturing Dwight with constant outlandish pranks.

As I get older I empathize more with Dwight rather than Jim. When I was younger it was the opposite.
Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1664 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

He never realizes his full potential in a career, but instead of taking steps to better himself, he just resents his situation and everyone around him.

Right. If Jim has such potential and is such a genius, why wouldn’t he have left by then? Is he supposed to be Steve Jobs in chains? I get that he’s “relatable” but the people similar to him that I know irl are irritating.
This post was edited on 9/16/21 at 1:15 pm
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
6794 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

this is a huge gripe of mine. If you watch the earlier seasons, everyone was relatively normal save for Michael and Dwight. It made the whole environment that much more realistic and the litany of straight men worked as a more vivid foil to Michael and Dwight’s characters. I think it wasn’t the initial intention of the writers that once they continued on from the end of the British Office, they were to Flanderize all of the secondary characters. I do understand that the show wouldn’t have run as long without adding in the zany quirks to Kevin, Kelly, Angela, etc, but maybe that would’ve been ok...



But I think this is what actually made the show work because it mirrors a real-life office experience. When you start to work in an office, everyone seems normal and straight-laced; however, as you get to know them you realize everyone has zany quirks. I have never once worked in an office where anyone is "normal," once gotten to know with enough time.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87380 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Charles was an awful manager who had no idea how to even identify strengths and weaknesses of his employees (Kevin is on the phones?) much less get the most out of those talents


yeah he is the perfect avatar of that mid-level exec who "goes with their gut," makes huge assumptions and doesn't bother to learn anything about anyone under them
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28836 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

If you watch the earlier seasons, everyone was relatively normal save for Michael and Dwight. It made the whole environment that much more realistic and the litany of straight men worked as a more vivid foil to Michael and Dwight’s characters. I think it wasn’t the initial intention of the writers that once they continued on from the end of the British Office, they were to Flanderize all of the secondary characters. I do understand that the show wouldn’t have run as long without adding in the zany quirks to Kevin, Kelly, Angela, etc, but maybe that would’ve been ok...



maybe it's the recency bias of having watched some of the later seasons more recently, but while it's painfully obvious that the supporting staff is supposed to be caricatures of certain personalities, everybody in that cast would have been fired by season 3 in a real world situation except Toby, Phyllis, and Oscar.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26079 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Just blaming the woman for having an opinion and not picking up and following the man on his whim


She's a receptionist who sucks at everything else she has tried to do. So, yea, she needs to adapt to the person in the family actually capable of making money.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26079 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

then she flirted with an affair with the camera


Far and away the worst story arc in the entire show.
Posted by lagallifrey
Member since Dec 2013
2010 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

mean Jim’s biggest problem with Dwight is that Dwight legitimately cares and works hard at his job.


Dwight’s main problem is that he is an idiot who is also an arrogant know-it-all. He thinks he is great at everything, and is good at very few things. He is a jerk to most people. He is extremely gullible. And yes, he is hard working. The good news is that he is played in a brilliantly hilarious way. He is a joy to watch. He and Michael are what make the show.
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6501 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

If you watch the earlier seasons, everyone was relatively normal save for Michael and Dwight.


In season 1, Kevin is just a boring accountant who can unexpectedly sink 3’s. By the end of the show they have an entire episode about how, if you just met him, you would think he’s actually retarded.
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
10618 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

season 1, Kevin is just a boring accountant who can unexpectedly sink 3’s. By the end of the show they have an entire episode about how, if you just met him, you would think he’s actually retarded.


I hated that. Kevin was great in the beginning and just his look was enough, there was no reason to go over the top stupid with him. His "idiot voice" gets annoying as shite during a binge
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150583 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:06 pm to
They went full on caricature of everyone. But Kevin kinda got fricked the worst. He was always an idiot, but not literally stupid. And he was sharp in some ways (like winning a WSOP bracelet, for example). Hell, one of the best storylines to me was when Holly started and Dwight made her think Kevin was retarded, and it made sense. But eventually they made him actually stupid, which was a shame.

I know most people love Creed but I think he’s one of the worst characters on the show. He’s just too over the top unbelievable that he would earn and keep that job. Sure, he was good for some funny lines here and there. But then they made him a cult leader, thief, murderer, etc. good for a few laughs, but completely unbelievable.

But even still, most characters are great given the limited screen time they had. And whenever they were given more screen time, it suffered. The “Did I Stutter?” episode, for example. Stanley is good in small doses. But when you give him too many lines the character suffers. That’s what happened to Andy and why he became so hate-able. He was great as a supporting character, but after The Hangover, they forced him into a major role, snd the character (and more importantly, the show) suffered because of that.

Still one of the GOAT shows though. I watch it at some point almost daily.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram