Started By
Message

Band of Brothers vs The Pacific

Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:33 am
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11920 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:33 am
This is not a debate of which series was better. And I may be posting in the wrong page. I recently rewatched both and I’m trying to decide who had a harder war front.

Easy company jumped in to Normandy and was surrounded from the beginning. They also faced freezing temperatures in Bastogne. Germans at times had better equipment.

The Marines in the Pacific face hot temps and no water at times. They fought in unforgiving terrain. They also faced an enemy that was not willing to surrender. Had it not been for the A-bomb the nips may not have surrendered and many more lives would have been lost.

So who had it worse?
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17138 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:52 am to
quote:

The Marines in the Pacific face hot temps and no water at times. They fought in unforgiving terrain. They also faced an enemy that was not willing to surrender. Had it not been for the A-bomb the nips may not have surrendered and many more lives would have been lost.


I will say the Marines on the Pacific front had it worse.

Disease
Brutal enemy
jungle and guerilla style battles
tactics from both sides that got medieval at times
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79221 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:55 am to
I suspect the fear of fighting an enemy that was totally foreign to you (non-western) created a completely different level of anxiety as well.

Certainly more inclined to dehumanization I assume.
Posted by LSUlefty
Youngsville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
26452 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:15 pm to
The Pacific was worse. The Japanese were savages and wouldn't surrender and were dug in really deep. Not to mention the heat and humidity of the jungle.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20389 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:17 pm to
If I had a choice, I would have chosen to fight in Europe.

Jungles, oppressive heat, uncertain supply lines, and a fanatical enemy that will sneak into your foxhole and cut your throat while you sleep doesn’t suit me very well.

Those Japs were scary as frick.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 12:18 pm
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34476 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:17 pm to
I’m pretty sure the large estimates of total Japanese prisoners taken is less than 50k.

The Pacific was rough.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58346 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

the nips


Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41195 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

If I had a choice, I would have chosen to fight in Europe.


agree
Posted by ForLSU56
Rapides Parish
Member since Feb 2015
5582 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:30 pm to
Marines and Army caught hell in the Pacific.
Neither front was nice but I would have to say the Pacific based on.

* the mentality of the enemy
* the terrain -- mountains, jungle, rivers
* the weather -- hot, humid, rainy
* the diseases

Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:41 pm to
Nipponese

Don't try to humanize them nips. They were animals and we're given the best option out.
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7512 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to
Better questions: Why'd you start two threads?
Posted by Fatboy22
Birmingham AL
Member since Aug 2018
1063 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:19 pm to
I've always believed the Pacific was worse. Brutal unforgiving landscape and conditions and disease. On top of that Japanese soldiers seemed to have a messianic love for the emperor. They were also trained from a young age to be merciless and sacrifice themselves in battle. You just didn't see that with German soldiers.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:22 pm to
Many German soldiers didn’t want to fight for the nazis. Wasn’t so much the case for the Japs
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57442 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Band of Brothers vs The Pacific
This is not a debate of which series was better.
well no shite. One was one of the best things on TV.... ever..... and one was a forgettable series outside of a few story lines.


quote:

I recently rewatched both and I’m trying to decide who had a harder war front. Easy company jumped in to Normandy and was surrounded from the beginning. They also faced freezing temperatures in Bastogne. Germans at times had better equipment. The Marines in the Pacific face hot temps and no water at times. They fought in unforgiving terrain. They also faced an enemy that was not willing to surrender. Had it not been for the A-bomb the nips may not have surrendered and many more lives would have been lost. So who had it worse?
thats a very very very tough question.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 2:28 pm
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57442 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

seemed to have a messianic love for the emperor
seemed? that it literal. He is a living god to them. I read on here recently someone referenced a documentary saying that it as pure genius that Truman Eisenhower and the top leaders in the US allowed the Emperor to remain because it we would have kill him we would still be in a "war" with Japan like we are with China and Russia.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:42 pm to
Definitely the marines (and soldiers) in the Pacific after the Japs stopped doing their silly banzai charges and would hole up in caves and use civilians as shields. The typical German soldier wasn't any different from us.
Roughly 1% of Allied prisoners died in German POW camps. It was 30% for Japanese camps...
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 2:46 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

well no shite. One was one of the best things on TV.... ever..... and one was a forgettable series outside of a few story lines.

Yeah, the only part of the Pacific I enjoyed was Leckie's.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16503 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 3:52 pm to
What just happened to the other thread with the same title?
Posted by stateofplay
Member since Sep 2018
1504 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 4:52 pm to
Marines of course. They were fighting the Japanese, all code of bushido, never give up, coming out of tunnels like Viet Cong.

The Nazis couldn't compare.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95247 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 5:28 pm to
Band of Brothers was a far better show

But honestly the two shows highlighted the differences in the two theaters

BOB showed the side of war between two somewhat civil forces. It showed the courage of young men and the bonds formed between those willing to die for each other, and the memories and stories between them that will last a lifetime



The pacific showed the ultimate hell war could be. Dirty, sick, marines fighting an enemy almost not human. It showed how there is no fond memory or lesson to take from hell like that. One could only hope to forget it

No question the pacific was the worse side of the war. BOB even highlighted how Easy company wanted no part of going to Japan
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 5:31 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram