Started By
Message

re: Animal Farm adaptation made for the "modern audience" slaughtered at box office

Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:32 am to
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14820 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:32 am to
Everybody should just watch this ridiculous one from 1999.

Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14703 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

They’re used to rewriting source material, including the Bible (The Chosen)
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35402 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:


They didn't greenlight it. They picked up US distribution of a completed film. They probably didn't spend much on it, given the film's rejection history. The negative response from its festival screenings last year, and the months-long delay between premiere and being acquired by Angel.


Dude, I wouldn't care if someone offered it to me for free - I wouldn't want to be associated with it.

Especially if I was trying to be seen in the way Angel Studios wants to be seen.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35402 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

"Modern" - LGBTQ, women, and racially resentful non-whites


Based on the plot synopsis I read (I have no intention of watching this), that's not what happened?

It appears "modern audiences" in this particular case is wealth inequality - but that's giving it a pretty generous read.

I swear though, looking through the cast list, I can't help but wonder why none of them scratched their heads at accepting it:

Seth Rogen
Gaten Matarazzo
Kieran Culkin
Glenn Close
Steve Buscemi
Laverne Cox
Woody Harrelson
Jim Parsons
Andy Serkis
Kathleen Turner
Iman Vellani


I mean, I may not like some of those folks, but that's a pretty big list of people I can identify by name (which is saying something for me).

Here's some of the critiques:

quote:

Peter Debruge of Variety wrote: "Serkis' 21st-century update dilutes Orwell's political allegory in favor of what passes for something more 'audience friendly': His approach adopts the celebrity voices, cutesy character designs and antic, mile-a-minute energy of big-studio American toons. The result isn't nearly as polished as Illumination or DreamWorks movies, but 'good enough for government work,' as the saying goes."


quote:

Mark Kennedy rated the film zero out of four stars in an Associated Press review, writing that "screenwriter Nicholas Stoller and director Andy Serkis' awfully misguided Disneyfication of one of the greatest allegorical satires in the English language is a cinematic car crash."


Some of the critiques were aimed at the changes in theme; one stating it as "Trump-era" but another just pointing out the connection to the era of corporations. It does seem, though, that most hated the idea of changing the story at all (considering it's one of the greater English novels of all time) AND the use of cute-style characters.

I think making this and something like Watership Down with cutesy characters obliterates the story.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram