- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Animal Farm adaptation made for the "modern audience" slaughtered at box office
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:32 am to Sasquatch Smash
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:32 am to Sasquatch Smash
Everybody should just watch this ridiculous one from 1999.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 12:45 pm to meeple
quote:
They’re used to rewriting source material, including the Bible (The Chosen)
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:24 pm to Jay Are
quote:
They didn't greenlight it. They picked up US distribution of a completed film. They probably didn't spend much on it, given the film's rejection history. The negative response from its festival screenings last year, and the months-long delay between premiere and being acquired by Angel.
Dude, I wouldn't care if someone offered it to me for free - I wouldn't want to be associated with it.
Especially if I was trying to be seen in the way Angel Studios wants to be seen.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:33 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
"Modern" - LGBTQ, women, and racially resentful non-whites
Based on the plot synopsis I read (I have no intention of watching this), that's not what happened?
It appears "modern audiences" in this particular case is wealth inequality - but that's giving it a pretty generous read.
I swear though, looking through the cast list, I can't help but wonder why none of them scratched their heads at accepting it:
Seth Rogen
Gaten Matarazzo
Kieran Culkin
Glenn Close
Steve Buscemi
Laverne Cox
Woody Harrelson
Jim Parsons
Andy Serkis
Kathleen Turner
Iman Vellani
I mean, I may not like some of those folks, but that's a pretty big list of people I can identify by name (which is saying something for me).
Here's some of the critiques:
quote:
Peter Debruge of Variety wrote: "Serkis' 21st-century update dilutes Orwell's political allegory in favor of what passes for something more 'audience friendly': His approach adopts the celebrity voices, cutesy character designs and antic, mile-a-minute energy of big-studio American toons. The result isn't nearly as polished as Illumination or DreamWorks movies, but 'good enough for government work,' as the saying goes."
quote:
Mark Kennedy rated the film zero out of four stars in an Associated Press review, writing that "screenwriter Nicholas Stoller and director Andy Serkis' awfully misguided Disneyfication of one of the greatest allegorical satires in the English language is a cinematic car crash."
Some of the critiques were aimed at the changes in theme; one stating it as "Trump-era" but another just pointing out the connection to the era of corporations. It does seem, though, that most hated the idea of changing the story at all (considering it's one of the greater English novels of all time) AND the use of cute-style characters.
I think making this and something like Watership Down with cutesy characters obliterates the story.
Popular
Back to top

0






