Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

A History of Violence question (spoiler potential)

Posted on 6/22/26 at 5:13 pm
Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
2140 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 5:13 pm
I just watched this for the first time. Overall, I really liked the movie. But why did William Hurt get an Oscar nomination for his role? I’ve always really like him as an actor, but he was in the movie for maybe 20 minutes and nothing really stuck out as memorable. Am I missing something? SIAP
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38742 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 5:56 pm to
Caring that someone got an Oscar nomination two decades ago sure is something.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38742 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 6:17 pm to
Fine downvoters, it's a great movie, so I'll respond.


quote:

I just watched this for the first time. Overall, I really liked the movie. But why did William Hurt get an Oscar nomination for his role? I’ve always really like him as an actor, but he was in the movie for maybe 20 minutes and nothing really stuck out as memorable. Am I missing something? SIAP


It's not like he got one award nom and somehow strangely won, look at the Wiki page, not only did the movie get nominated everywhere, but Hurt specfically did and did nab a few. That always helps.

He's William Hurt, that also helps. He was at least due for another nomination.

He lost to Clooney in Syriana - not a super amazing performance. And was up against Gyllenhal, Giamatti, Matt Dillon in Crash (eww).

Other potential nominees:
Bob Hoskins — Mrs. Henderson Presents
Will Ferrell — The Producers
Kevin Costner — The Upside of Anger
Terrence Howard — Crash
Donald Sutherland — Pride & Prejudice
Chris Cooper — Capote
Edward Norton — Kingdom of Heaven
Peter Sarsgaard — Jarhead
Mickey Rourke — Sin City


Actually wrong year in last version, this was a bad year for supporting actor You wanted 20 min. of masked screen time from norton, or 30 min. screen time from Marv?

He definitely deserved it.

This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 6:27 pm
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13357 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 6:25 pm to
He was great in it. Reminded me of Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast five years earlier with the unrelenting intensity being conveyed in just a look. Also, they give the supporting nods to actors w/ very little screen time traditionally. Ben Johnson won for Last Picture Show w/ 9 minutes of screen time. Hurt had only 8 minutes 22 seconds, which would have set a new record.
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
32646 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:31 pm to
I watched this for the first time in my life last night too. Really good movie. Viggo Mortensen can act.

In terms of William Hurt though, while yeah he wasn't in the movie long at all, I did enjoy his accent for some reason.
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
20254 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:38 pm to
Jesus Joey.
Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
2140 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Crash


I forgot to look up when this movie was nominated. It all makes sense now.
Posted by THRILLHO
Old Metairie near Cleary
Member since Apr 2006
50474 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

He definitely deserved it.



Reading this:

quote:

Other potential nominees:



You're probably right. I'm a Chris Cooper-stan (his performance in Adaptation is one of my top 10 GOATs, whether leading or supporting). And I really like Norton, even though he's supposedly an a-hole. But it's tough to win an award when your face is covered the entire movie (Hugo Weaving deserved, at the very least, an Oscar nomination as V). Nothing else really stands out on that list.

I'll probably take some shite for it, but "A History of Violence" was a VERY well made movie that I liked, but didn't love. I felt the same way about "Master and Commander" (even superior in its "well-madeness") many years back, gave it a few rewatches, and ended up loving it. My rewatches of History of Violence haven't changed my opinion: very well made but doesn't have anything that makes it elite. I feel like it would have worked MUCH better as a 6-8 hour miniseries, giving more time settle into Viggo's mundane life, building up the pressure from his past life, and spending more time on his family's lives changing from this evolving threat. The final episode could be the final ~30 minutes of the film.

Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69123 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:51 pm to
I really liked that movie. Viggo Mortensen was incredibly charismatic.

Hurt’s character wasn’t on screen a lot, but it was a pivotal role and had a great scene with his brother(played by Viggo)…
Posted by THRILLHO
Old Metairie near Cleary
Member since Apr 2006
50474 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Hurt’s character wasn’t on screen a lot,


Ned Beatty says "sup".

Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
2140 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

pivotal role



No respect?
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 9:45 pm
Posted by PuertoRicanBlaze
Book Board Admin
Member since Apr 2024
7579 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 2:55 am to
I just remember the wife had a bush and got movie fricked on the stairs.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22645 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:32 am to
Great movie, Hurt was the worst part of it. He keeps calling Viggo's character bro- heim and it was dumb as shite
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32843 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 3:07 pm to
What’s so odd to me is how this and Eastern Promises are so different from the rest of Cronenberg’s films.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104663 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 3:08 pm to
I guess guys trying to slice the stars off you with linoleum knives was him getting his fill of body horror for one film.
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7917 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Great movie, Hurt was the worst part of it. He keeps calling Viggo's character bro- heim and it was dumb as shite


THANK YOU! Agree 100%. And I thought his accent was ridiculous.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41650 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:27 am to

Weak year. It was actually less than 10 minutes not 20. Against his normal typecasting is why he won. Although I am shocked Brokeback boy didn't win. Today he would easily win over Hurt in the exact same roles.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram