- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is the Washington Redskins Name/Logo Being Singled Out?
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
What about the "fighting irish"? It directly implies the stereotype of a drunken irish man who wants to fight at the bar.
Not this shite again.
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:29 pm to Degas
quote:
Cleveland "Indians"
Chief Wahoo certainly hasn't gone unnoticed. The Indians have been phasing out (allegedly) the Chief for four or five years.
eta. I would wager that the Redskins' logo would be less offensive it belonged to the Indians. Whereas it would be more offensive for the Redskins to have Chief Wahoo.
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:34 pm to 91TIGER
quote:
if you research it you'll find that 95% of native Americans don't find it offensive and actually use the nickname at their schools and came up with the name for themselves.
LINK
And you don't think there may be a little bias in that websites research?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:38 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Blackhawks are a tribe from the area. As long as they don't create caricatures of natives, it's not really a matter of racism.
![](https://assets.sbnation.com/assets/229610/chicago_blackhawks.gif)
None here. Move along.........
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:46 pm to Degas
Because Redskins sounds way more racist than Warriors
Posted on 6/10/15 at 3:51 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:The Sheboygan Redskins were an NBA team in the 1940's and '50's. Was that name intended to be racist, too?
Redskin was a racial slur used to describe Native Americans.
Were owners just naming their team racist names? Or do people from today look back and just assume it's racist even though it really wasn't?
![](https://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/files/CMS/image/Sheboygan%20Redskins%20Jerseys.png)
![](https://www.bmwcards.net/redskinsfrontlarge.jpg)
![](https://www.premierauctionsonline.com/ItemImages/000026/620106_lg.jpeg)
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:02 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:I really hope you aren't this dense.
The Sheboygan Redskins were an NBA team in the 1940's and '50's. Was that name intended to be racist, too?
It's been well documented that the original owner of the Washington Redskins named them that to appeal to a certain demographic of the country.
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:12 pm to JBeam
quote:What does that have to do with the Sheboygan Redskins?
I really hope you aren't this dense. It's been well documented that the original owner of the Washington Redskins named them that to appeal to a certain demographic of the country. This post was edited on 6/10 at 4:03 pm
And if the original owner of the Washington Redskins said he purposely named the team a racial slur, then prove it.
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:21 pm to Degas
Because it sounds better than the Washington Darkies
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:24 pm to Degas
Because it's the most overtly racist name.
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:43 pm to Overbrook
quote:
Because it's the most overtly racist name.
Then who's next in the pecking order...Blackhawks or Indians?
Posted on 6/10/15 at 4:57 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
University of North Dakota got fricked by the PC shite the most.
They completely honored the Sioux Indian with their logo and traditions. PC frickers got them, they fought for a long time, but NCAA try to cripple them if they didnt give in.
All it takes, is 1 dildo liberal to frick it up for everyone these days. Doesn't matter if 30K approve, knowing that 1 person is offended, trumps the 30K.
Now, Nort Dakota has some shitty, Notre Dame, ND looking logo.
They completely honored the Sioux Indian with their logo and traditions. PC frickers got them, they fought for a long time, but NCAA try to cripple them if they didnt give in.
All it takes, is 1 dildo liberal to frick it up for everyone these days. Doesn't matter if 30K approve, knowing that 1 person is offended, trumps the 30K.
Now, Nort Dakota has some shitty, Notre Dame, ND looking logo.
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:10 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Were owners just naming their team racist names? Or do people from today look back and just assume it's racist even though it really wasn't?
Are you serious? The intent doesn't have to be malicious. Ignorance is enough.
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:14 pm to 91TIGER
quote:
Because the owner doesn't give all of his money to Democrats / progressives.
When the persecution of rich white conservatives end? Did the police break up you pool party last weekend?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:21 pm to stlslick
quote:
University of North Dakota got fricked by the PC shite the most.
They completely honored the Sioux Indian with their logo and traditions. PC frickers got them, they fought for a long time, but NCAA try to cripple them if they didnt give in
I forgot the details, but I think one Sioux tribe wanted the university to keep the logo, but the other never gave the NCAA an answer, so the NCAA said the logo had to go.
Illinois got screwed, too. They had to give up Chief Illiniwek, even though the only living descendants of the Illini or Illinois Confederation are part of the Peoria Tribe of Oklahoma now. Hell, the state's name is just the French version of Illiniwek.
Ironically, the last Chief Illiniwek costume was donated to Illinois by the chief of a Sioux tribe.
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:26 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Out of all this dumb sensitive mascot shite, I actually, somewhat, understand how "Redskins" can be offensive. According to Native Americans they interviewed on ESPN, its the equivalent of calling a team "Ni***rs" or "Zipperheads". People in this country are so separated from Reservation society that I think we just don't realize it maybe?
the fact that you have to put stars in one of those words shows that it is not equally as offensive
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 6/10/15 at 6:34 pm to Degas
quote:
None here. Move along.........
![](https://assets.sbnation.com/assets/229610/chicago_blackhawks.gif)
![](https://www.findthatlogo.com/wp-content/gallery/minnesota-vikings-logos/minnesota-vikings-logo.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2815110476/033393c13e6dec0fd6cc5006453fbeb5_400x400.png)
![](https://www.eurweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/New_England_Patriots.jpg)
So we cant have logos with people in them?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)