- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why Bama would have a better resume than Texas if both win their conference
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:45 pm to Jon Ham
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:45 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
My argument is what the CFP committee has always said. They look for the 4 best teams based on resume
Ok but the committee has also said that head to head is part of the resume, perhaps most important when things are otherwise equal
1
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:45 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Just like you you’re not even going to try to address the tcu-Michigan game last year.
The TCU/Mich result was irrelevant to my argument that 10-2 Bama, with two close end of game losses on the road against two quality SEC teams, had a better resume than TCU who didn’t even win their shitty conference and had a shite non-con schedule. My argument was basically that the SEC is so much better than the Big 12, you cant automatically put a 1 loss Big 12 team higher than a 2 loss SEC team.
I was proven right when SEC representative Georgia beat TCU 65-7.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:48 pm to UnluckyTiger
You mean lik where the Playoff Committees FIRST CHARGE stated we must look at the whole season like they do in Basketball. By te way, to hell with Texas, FSU, Oregon and Wash. are not top 10 teams, its a joke looking at those teams who have played on the weak PAC 12 and Weak ACC where UK just beat a 10-1 Louisville. Just like injuries in Basketball, FSU without their QB is a scrub team whom Florida should have beat.
Anyone comparing the SEC vs any of those conferences is lu lu.Big Ten, got two teams in last year, both got beat.
Anyone comparing the SEC vs any of those conferences is lu lu.Big Ten, got two teams in last year, both got beat.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:49 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
perhaps most important when things are otherwise equal
Does this look like “otherwise equal,” or can you say that one team clearly has a better resume and therefore there is no need to go to any “tiebreaker” type rules?
Team A: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team
Team B: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:50 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
The TCU/Mich result was irrelevant to my argument
In a world where irrelevant means proven that it was complete shite, then yes the result of that game was very irrelevant to your argument.
quote:
I was proven right when SEC representative Georgia beat TCU 65-7.
What was the score of the tcu-Michigan game?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:51 pm to UnluckyTiger
quote:
Yeah except that whole head to head thing…
Bama is a different team now
Milroe no longer sucks
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:53 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Bama is a different team now
Well I claim the 2006 title for LSU now then
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:54 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
You just mean that you don’t like that when people consider the whole resume, they aren’t giving absurdly more weight to the result of one game that favors team B when the complete resume clearly shows that team A had a better season. And you don’t like that because of some subjective feeling of “what’s fair” while not considering the unfairness of your methodology.
My argument puts the results of head to head above subjective rankings of who they played. I can’t think of a more “fair” methodology than having seen an actual game with an actual result.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:56 pm to midnight_chopper
quote:
My argument puts the results of head to head above subjective rankings of who they played. I can’t think of a more “fair” methodology than having seen an actual game with an actual result.
So OU over Texas.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:00 pm to Jon Ham
Bama fans melting already is so glorious. I want this scenario to happen just to taste the delicious tears. Bama got away with so many extra shots they didn’t deserve they can’t handle not getting the special treatment.
Roll tears Roll.
Roll tears Roll.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:01 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Jon Ham
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:01 pm to H-Town Tiger
I hate Bama, not that it should matter.
Regardless of who your team is, we can all agree Team A has the better resume.
Team A: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team
Team B: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team
Regardless of who your team is, we can all agree Team A has the better resume.
Team A: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team
Team B: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:06 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Team A: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team Team B: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team
Yes when rankings are completely subjective, those resumes are as equal as can be.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:09 pm to Jon Ham
Damn only one way to find out, they should play each other
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:09 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
I hate Bama, should matter
Sure. The people who love them aren’t sucking them off more than you
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:11 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:Would you mind explaining this to me?
Bama got away with so many extra shots they didn’t deserve
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:16 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
Yes when rankings are completely subjective, those resumes are as equal as can be.
Where do you have 11-1 James Madison in your CFP rankings?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:16 pm to Jon Ham
As Phil Hartman playing Ed McMahon would say, 'You are correct sir!'
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
42-28
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:21 pm to DBG
quote:
Well I claim the 2006 title for LSU now then
They lost 2 games
Page 5 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News