- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who is the most accurate bracketologist out there?
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:33 am
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:33 am
Palm? Lunardi? Someone else?
10
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:35 am to lsutiger2
Lunardi and it's not close
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:35 am to lsutiger2
Lunardi is usually pretty accurate. He usually nails 66 or 67 of the 68 team field and has pretty good gauge on seeding. Except for LSU who will undoubtedly be a seed or 2 below projections.
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:40 am to GeauxLSU4
Poor LSU
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:47 am to lsutiger2
Lunardi the best at predicting the field, although his seeding is usually a bit off.
Posted on 3/7/22 at 12:03 pm to lsutiger2
Lunardi on who gets in. He isn't real great on seeding, but who is?
Posted on 3/7/22 at 12:03 pm to lsutiger2
Lunardi
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:24 pm to lsutiger2
Why do people think it’s Lunardi? Bracket matrix does a 5 year ranking to rank how accurate they are. Lunardi is 55th and Jerry Palm is 100th.
There are much better sources for bracket predictions and Lundari routinely missing basic bracket rules. On today’s bracket he had Alabama facing SDSU who they already played and a potential rematch against Iona in the second round. Neither of these would be allowed.
There are much better sources for bracket predictions and Lundari routinely missing basic bracket rules. On today’s bracket he had Alabama facing SDSU who they already played and a potential rematch against Iona in the second round. Neither of these would be allowed.
This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:33 pm to lsutiger2
Lunardi is a whole arse clown.
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:35 pm to Rb52224
You can have rematches if non conference. You can’t have conference play until sweet 16.
Each of the top four teams selected from a conference shall be placed in different regions if they are seeded on the first four lines.
Teams from the same conference shall not meet before the regional final if they played each other three or more times during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
Teams from the same conference shall not meet before the regional semifinals if they played each other twice during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
Teams from the same conference may play each other as early as the second round if they played no more than once during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
If possible, rematches of nonconference regular-season games should be avoided in the First Four and first round.
Each of the top four teams selected from a conference shall be placed in different regions if they are seeded on the first four lines.
Teams from the same conference shall not meet before the regional final if they played each other three or more times during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
Teams from the same conference shall not meet before the regional semifinals if they played each other twice during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
Teams from the same conference may play each other as early as the second round if they played no more than once during the regular season, to include the conference tournament.
If possible, rematches of nonconference regular-season games should be avoided in the First Four and first round.
This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:37 pm to lsutiger2
Lunardi is incredibly over rated
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:38 pm to lsutiger2
Lunardi is great I agree, but I still go with Bracket Matrix and go with what the consensus goes with because the comm. is so bad.
Posted on 3/7/22 at 2:29 pm to Coastrashtiger
Bracket matrix is good but they have a few brackets that are clearly formula driven that screw things up. Like a bracket that will have a consensus 1 seed as a 4 or a team every other bracket has out of the tournament as a 9 seed.
Posted on 3/7/22 at 5:56 pm to sms151t
quote:
If possible, rematches of nonconference regular-season games should be avoided in the First Four and first round.
So why wouldn’t SDSU be swapped with the other 12 seed in this scenario?
Posted on 3/7/22 at 6:13 pm to Rb52224
Seeding integrity and PODS
Posted on 3/7/22 at 9:28 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Bracket matrix is good but they have a few brackets that are clearly formula driven that screw things up. Like a bracket that will have a consensus 1 seed as a 4 or a team every other bracket has out of the tournament as a 9 seed.
that's actually the entire point of having bracket matrix to consolidate all of them and NOT have it screw things up.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 8:37 am to lsutiger2
I wouldn’t give Lunardi too much credit for how many teams he has in the tournament. If you follow college basketball, then you can probably get 65-67 of them right. Conference autos swallow up almost half the field, and at-larges generally go to the next 30 obvious teams. If you follow college basketball, you know who those teams are in a given season. The bubble teams are the hardest 3-5 spots to nail down.
The seedings are where these guys should be judged.
The seedings are where these guys should be judged.
This post was edited on 3/8/22 at 8:38 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News