- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which NFL team is worse?
Posted on 11/20/09 at 4:41 am
Posted on 11/20/09 at 4:41 am
Browns,lions,Tampa bay, Jacksonville,buffalo,or the rams? I'm not just talkin wins and losses. The weapons on the team and the general direction of the team?
5
Posted on 11/20/09 at 4:43 am to SquadFour
sweet and original thread topic. 
Posted on 11/20/09 at 5:06 am to SquadFour
i think the browns suck the most. the team flat out CANNOT score.. absolutely horrid. there is nothing worse out there..
In order of suckage to decent
Browns WORST
Raiders
Rams
Lions
Bucs
Bills
Jags BEST
In order of suckage to decent
Browns WORST
Raiders
Rams
Lions
Bucs
Bills
Jags BEST
This post was edited on 11/20/09 at 5:10 am
Posted on 11/20/09 at 7:31 am to beauchristopher
Why are the Jags on this list they are 5-4 and in the playoff hunt in the AFC.
Anyway out of that list Browns are the worst with the Raiders a close second.
Anyway out of that list Browns are the worst with the Raiders a close second.
This post was edited on 11/20/09 at 7:33 am
Posted on 11/20/09 at 8:39 am to 225rumpshaker
Browns and everyone else. As bad as the Raiders are, it's not even close.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 8:41 am to SquadFour
Why are the Jags mentioned and the Raiders aren't???
Posted on 11/20/09 at 8:43 am to Toula
Tampa's owner is $1.5 billion in debt. I'd say they are fricked worse than all of the other franchises combined as they quite honestly can't afford shite right now.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:11 am to SquadFour
browns no question
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:12 am to SquadFour
quote:
Browns,lions,Tampa bay, Jacksonville,buffalo,or the rams?
Awesome list.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:14 am to adammwilson
quote:
browns no question
who the hell lets their coach hire the GM
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:21 am to 225rumpshaker
quote:
Why are the Jags on this list they are 5-4 and in the playoff hunt in the AFC.
Anyway out of that list Browns are the worst with the Raiders a close second.
They can't fill their ground though.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:24 am to Mephistopheles
quote:
They can't fill their ground though.
Because the economy sucks doesn't mean that the team does.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:26 am to Sophandros
Browns may be the worst but they do have some talent if they can get the right coach and gm there. I don't think it'd take long to turn that franchise around.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:33 am to Sophandros
quote:
Because the economy sucks doesn't mean that the team does.
It certainly doesn't make them a bad team, and you've got to feel for the players and Del Rio because that team has been pretty good for most of the last 6 or so seasons. But in the long run, the Browns will keep going, the Bills and Raiders will probably move (and Al Davis will die), the Bucs will get sold, but the Jags are a good team in a tough division and are having real problems filling their stadium, and as far as I know, always have - what happens when the team loses a few key players and turns to shite?
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:46 am to Mephistopheles
They draft new players.
It's assinine to put a team with a winning record on a list of "worst teams in the NFL".
Now, if it was a worst fan bases or worst location for a time discussion, then you'd be money.
It's assinine to put a team with a winning record on a list of "worst teams in the NFL".
Now, if it was a worst fan bases or worst location for a time discussion, then you'd be money.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 9:54 am to Sophandros
quote:
It's assinine to put a team with a winning record on a list of "worst teams in the NFL".
+1
Posted on 11/20/09 at 11:17 am to beauchristopher
quote:Both of these teams have decent defenses, so I'd say they can't be worst.
Browns WORST
Raiders
quote:Worst, IMO.
Rams
quote:Do not belong on list. Should be replaced by
Jags
Chiefs.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 11:42 am to wrlakers
Cleveland has 30 players on the team that should not even be in the NFL.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 11:50 am to Muahahaha
The rams could be considered the worse.. but Steven Jackson alone is just a man among boys.. The rams can still score and Bulger has been a pro bowl caliber QB before.. The Rams actually have a good coach the players are actually trying to win for.
I just think a team that can't score whatsoever is absolutely horrid.. The Browns are absolutely painful to watch.. and they are an absolute mess inside and out.
I agree Oakland has a decent defense, and play makers.. but he said to take account everything.. including ownership, coaching, players etc.. which definitely puts the raiders in the bottom 3 overall.
I just think a team that can't score whatsoever is absolutely horrid.. The Browns are absolutely painful to watch.. and they are an absolute mess inside and out.
I agree Oakland has a decent defense, and play makers.. but he said to take account everything.. including ownership, coaching, players etc.. which definitely puts the raiders in the bottom 3 overall.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 11:51 am to beauchristopher
Yeah I'm confused about whoever said the Browns have talent? Please tell me where.. Their best player is a kick/punt returner..
And I agree about the Chiefs.. how did they get a pass on not being mentioned here. Haha.
And I agree about the Chiefs.. how did they get a pass on not being mentioned here. Haha.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News