- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What's wrong with the cavs?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:55 am to Boomshockalocka
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:55 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:
"Bron had no help. That's why he had to leave. 21/9 players grow on trees!"
I posted their record with lord and savior 21/9 Jamison.
11-47. Who couldn't jump on an 11-47 team and turn them into a title winner?! They had a 21/9 guy!!!
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:55 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:
In no way were they contenders without Jordan.
Bum. Stahp.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:56 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:
A contender is a team who has a legit shot to win a title. Bulls with no Jordan had NO shot. Their record and where they finished in the conference in and of itself doesn't make them a contender
Oh, gotcha. So like an 11-47 team (they had a 21/9 guy!!!)
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:56 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:How does a team filled with role player kinda guys win 55 games and snag the 2 seed?
In no way were they contenders without Jordan.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 11:58 am to Tiger Prawn
They were maybe contenders to win the east. Not the whole thing.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:04 pm to shel311
Dude the Spurs got the 2 seed last year with almost all role players and won 65+ games. They were NOT contenders. They never had more than a 5-10% at best shot at winning the title. 10% isn't enough for me to call you a contender. Regardless of record or where you finish in the conference. If your eye test can't distinguish between contender and not then I'm wasting my time.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:04 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
A contender is a team who has a legit shot to win a title
So by your definition the Rockets are not a contender this season. Thanks.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:06 pm to redfishfan
Borderline. I wouldn't throw a fit like the Lebron fanboys are in this thread if someone said they weren't that's for sure.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:06 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:My bad, I had originally thought the Spurs had the MVP runner up, but i guess they just had a role player instead.
Dude the Spurs got the 2 seed last year with almost all role players
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:06 pm to shel311
quote:
How does a team filled with role player kinda guys win 55 games and snag the 2 seed?
They needed a guy like Antwaun Jamison to push them over the top.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:07 pm to shel311
YEa you right your bad you must be too dumb to know what 'almost all' 'means.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:07 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:THere's only 2 contenders this season.
10% isn't enough for me to call you a contender.
Which site's playoff probabilities you using these daily as most reliable?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:08 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Dude the Spurs got the 2 seed last year with almost all role players and won 65+ games
You do know that pretty much every NBA GM would take Leonard over Harden right?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:09 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
YEa you right your bad you must be too dumb to know what 'almost all' 'means.
You might literally be retarded.
The Spurs weren't contenders because "almost all" of their players were role players.
That describes every team that ever existed.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:12 pm to shel311
quote:
There's a difference between management building a teams and the new movement ushered in by Lebron of the best players in the game teaming up to win a try to win a title --- And that difference is what?
You really don't see a difference? LeBron's two switches of teams have involved a package of somehow getting a big 3, and yes LeBron knew Love and Bosh were going with him otherwise he wouldn't have agreed
Also, LeBron needed the best three point shooter of all time along with 3 top 5 2003 draft picks (arguably best draft class ever) to win a ship, and hes doing the same exact thing with Korver this year
Jordan's team was developed into a "super team" by good management and over time became dominant, while LeBron sold himself in packages to get championships
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:13 pm to redfishfan
quote:
You do know that pretty much every NBA GM would take Leonard over Harden right?
Wrong. Every GM would.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 12:15 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
None would
Leonard is probably the 3rd best player in the world. The best defender in the NBA by far.
Popular
Back to top


0




