Started By
Message

re: What's wrong with the cavs?

Posted on 1/25/17 at 1:50 pm to
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
5496 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

well that's when you see another rd 2 exit.


Yea considered a bad thing for the Spurs and a good season for the Rockets.
Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I can Intepret how I see fit.


So you want to just live in "Boomland" & create your own rules for what constitutes a " contender"?


The Bulls weren't "any team". They were the defending NBA champs who win the East if Pippen (only played 72)stays healthy.




Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 1:54 pm to
No that's par for the course for the Spurs these days. Timmy is gone. Parker and manu are washed up. Those days are OVER. 2 STRAIGHT seasons without 2 playoff series wins.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 1:55 pm to
I use what I see with my own eyes. So yea it is I guess. I'm not gonna call a team a contender just bc they have a certain amount of wins. I remember those bulls teams. They weren't impressive at all IMO. Not a contender.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22283 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 5:01 pm to
Need a back up PG Lebrun playing to many minutes
Posted by Aggie Fishfinder
Republic of Texas
Member since Feb 2012
4260 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Need a back up PG Lebrun playing to many minutes


I used to say that Lebron was playing too many minutes. But 6 straight trips to the finals doesn't lie. Minutes won't be the issue if the Cavs don't repeat.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112832 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

remember those bulls teams. They weren't impressive at all IMO. Not a contender
You guys do know why Boom is saying this, right?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 6:25 pm to
Yea bc their SRS which is based on net rating had them as ab the 10th best team. Clear contender!! LINK
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112832 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Yea bc their SRS which is based on net rating had them as ab the 10th best team. Clear contender!! LINK

Ahh, you're using Bref as credible now?

Good to know. Why the flip flop?

From that list in 1994, Houston was closer to the Bulls than they were to #1. Nailed it!!!

Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 6:34 pm to
Never once said they weren't credible. And CC got the name clutch city bc of those playoffs. So the lone exception doesn't help your case ....
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112832 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

So the lone exception
That eye test tho!!!
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 1/25/17 at 6:37 pm to
My eye test blows yours out the water we've known this for years.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 13Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram