Started By
Message

re: What are the top 3 college sports?

Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:16 pm to
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27167 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:16 pm to
Lacrosse
Posted by LSUtigersarefun
Member since Aug 2009
9602 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:18 pm to
More money is spent on women's basketball, but more money is made on baseball.
I don't know that a women's basketball team has ever made a profit.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
17843 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Lacrosse
In that region, why not? It's a huge deal and there's no clear 3.

The answer to the thread varies by region.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

college baseball means nothing to most all college sports fans outside of a the sec and a few other schools. it and hockey are probably on the same level.


Baseball is definitively nothing in a lot of places, but I'd say baseball by default, mostly because there are 300-plus D-1 teams. Hockey and Lacrosse are unquestionably more popular than baseball in certain areas but both have only about 60 teams and major chunks of the country have zero teams--not interest, but teams. Baseball is more of a common denominator.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9032 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:32 pm to
It's baseball for the simple reason that it's the only other true national sport. Now a large part of the country may not care that their school has a baseball team but at least the vast majority of D-1 schools have a team. Thanks to Title IX men's soccer, lacrosse, and hockey won't ever get the chance to grow to that size
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
93629 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

What's number 3? Women's Basketball



Posted by RandyVandy
Member since Nov 2011
954 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:20 pm to
quote:


Baseball is definitively nothing in a lot of places, but I'd say baseball by default, mostly because there are 300-plus D-1 teams. Hockey and Lacrosse are unquestionably more popular than baseball in certain areas but both have only about 60 teams and major chunks of the country have zero teams--not interest, but teams. Baseball is more of a common denominator.



Why does # of teams matter? There are more women's soccer teams than Football teams; does that make it more popular? Final Four lacrosse games get crowds of over 40k.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9032 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:46 pm to
It's not the number of teams per se. It's how widespread they are. No one doubts how popular Lacrosse is in the northeast. But that'd be like saying NASCAR is the second most popular sport in America bc certain races draw upwards of 100k. You could get as many as 500k rednecks to attend a nascar race and it still wouldn't be an argument as to nascars national popularity. Same with lacrosse
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177328 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:49 pm to
The top 3 in college is the same as the top 3 professionally. Baseball teams in the north suck so they don't care or put any effort into it.

It's too cold.
Posted by RandyVandy
Member since Nov 2011
954 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

It's not the number of teams per se. It's how widespread they are. No one doubts how popular Lacrosse is in the northeast. But that'd be like saying NASCAR is the second most popular sport in America bc certain races draw upwards of 100k. You could get as many as 500k rednecks to attend a nascar race and it still wouldn't be an argument as to nascars national popularity. Same with lacrosse


In raw viewership, NASCAR is the second most popular sport in the US.
This post was edited on 4/1/12 at 11:55 pm
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9032 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:18 am to
Define raw viewership
Posted by the crue
Chackbay-Thibodaux
Member since May 2008
4077 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:24 am to
quote:


heavily depends on what are of the country you're in...
if your in the midwest it's wrestling hands down. my wife is from iowa, & father in law was going crazy watching iowa wrestling like i am with lsu baseball. so i agree with what part of the country you are from.
Posted by RandyVandy
Member since Nov 2011
954 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:33 am to
quote:

Define raw viewership


# of people that attend races or view races on TV.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:36 am to
quote:

Men's baseball and it isn't even close.


West Coast and SEC tip the scales here.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:36 am to
baseball has a much better geographic base any of the other sports in this thread. On the west coast, USC has far and away the most national titles, and Arizona State, Oregon State, CSF, UC Irvine, etc. are strong programs. The Big 12 brings teams to the CWS consistently with Texas and Nerbraska (no longer Big 12) being two of the bigger programs. SEC is of course dominant and ACC has a few good programs like UNC and da U. Even small private schools like Rice and Tulane have been among the elite of college baseball at times.

CWS games come on at primetime on ESPN during the summer, at least from semi-finals on.

hockey and lacrosse are not even close.
This post was edited on 4/2/12 at 12:38 am
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9032 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 12:38 am to
I have a hard time believing that. There's way more baseball, basketball, and hockey games for people to attend. Plus basketball and baseball get higher ratings.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Why does # of teams matter? There are more women's soccer teams than Football teams; does that make it more popular? Final Four lacrosse games get crowds of over 40k.


Ok, well the OP never defined "Top" so it's subjective. IMO baseball is No. 3 becasue there are teams accross the country. Lacrosse and Hockey are, for the most part, isolated to certain geographic regions, thereby limiting their impact and interest accross the country.

If someone is serious about this topic, the OP should look up info like revenue, attendence, etc.



Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9656 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 9:14 am to
Iowa Wrestling gets over 9,000 fans a meet and has had close to 16,000 for huge meets. College wrestling is big in the midwest along with hockey. Baseball is non-existent since they have a hard time competing with the South's weather advantage.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 9:31 am to
quote:

isolated to certain geographic regions, thereby limiting their impact and interest accross the country.


So is baseball. Although baseball is more widespread than hockey or lacrosse.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126745 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Hockey is bigger than Baseball in the midwest and east.



wrestling can be thrown in the mix as well
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram