Started By
Message

re: Trump expected to sign executive order soon on NCAA transfer portal, NIL, and eligibility

Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:07 pm to
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162928 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:07 pm to
Great you just rang the politard bell….
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
1247 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 1:07 am to
None of it is enforceable. Unlimited transferring with no sit out period is the entire reason players can maximize their worth. Taking that away will be deemed unconstitutional.
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3740 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 1:47 am to
I look forward to seeing the MAGA Attorney Generals (lead by Ohio's Dave Yost) whose original lawsuit against the NCAA saying limiting transfers was unconstitutional now try and walk their words back to appease Daddy.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5204 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 2:07 am to
quote:

None of it is enforceable. Unlimited transferring with no sit out period is the entire reason players can maximize their worth. Taking that away will be deemed unconstitutional.


Universities which take federal funding are absolutely subject to federal regulation.

If a University wants to forgo all public funds and make up their own rules they certainly can.

But you can't demand money from the tax payers and then cry foul when that money comes with conditions.

This executive order is designed to strong arm universities into "voluntary" compliance by withholding funds.

Schools cannot both simultaneously claim to be private organizations hat can do whatever they want while also taking tax payer money.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63763 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:15 am to
quote:

Attorney Generals


*attorneys general.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69540 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 6:02 am to
This is amazing and pretty well done.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
25733 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 6:08 am to
DJT focused on the important issues
Posted by SA4LSU
AZ
Member since Sep 2005
4969 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

I'm MAGA to the bone. But, this here ain't none of his business.


Then whose business is it? I mean we would all agree some guard rails need to be put in place here right?
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
27939 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:02 am to
quote:

allowed to transfer once without penalty, but a second transfer would trigger an automatic redshirt season

i've said this for years...
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61014 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Universities which take federal funding are absolutely subject to federal regulation. If a University wants to forgo all public funds and make up their own rules they certainly can.


quote:

This executive order is designed to strong arm universities into "voluntary" compliance by withholding funds. Schools cannot both simultaneously claim to be private organizations hat can do whatever they want while also taking tax payer money.

I really can’t wait until the next time there’s a D in the White House and they use arguments like this
This post was edited on 4/4/26 at 8:19 am
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61014 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

But, this here ain't none of his business.


Of course it’s not.

quote:

Then whose business is it?


The NCAA and or the schools themselves. It’s fricking amazing how one Game Show host becomes President and suddenly the right is in favor of the Government intruding into every aspect of life

quote:

I mean we would all agree some guard rails need to be put in place here right?


Define guardrails.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23008 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I really can’t wait until the next time there’s a D in the White House and they use arguments like this

Like Democratic Presidents have always done?

But this isn't a D v R discussion. Will this stand up in court? Probably not but it depends on what regulatory power in education funding that Congress has ceded to the executive. If it's broad, and it is a restriction of general funds then it might stand up to a challenge. If the funding Trump is saying to restrict is from restricted funds or appropriated for a specific purpose then it won't. However, it's worth a fight and maybe Congress will see it's popular and pass actual legislation regarding this.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
5364 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:24 am to
The only guard rail that can be put in that will pass judicial scrutiny is a collectively and mutually bargained agreement between the players and the colleges.

Fans act like college sports are something unique and special. In 2026, they are not. They are an entertainment business just like any other business and subject to the laws that govern all other businesses about restraint of trade and hindrances placed on people trying to seek fair market compensation for their talents and barring mutually and contractually agreed to restrictions to seek that compensation from a different employer.

This whole thing was a house of cards for generations and was destined to collapse when the right case got before the right judges and I remind you that the Supreme Court case that cleared the way for this was decided 9-0 with some justices signaling strongly that they were willing to go even farther in the players’ favor.

This action is a publicity stunt designed to shore up the midterms. But fans who think they have a tangible sense of ownership in this product … they never really have and never really will … like I said are going to ejaculate on themselves thinking that Daddy has fixed everything and is going to bring those uppity players to heel and restore everything to its true and righteous and rightful state.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71158 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

This action is a publicity stunt designed to shore up the midterms.


This is patently absurd. I don't know if you have been paying attention to what's been going on in the world over the last few weeks, but relatively few people are paying attention to collegiate athletics right now. The midterms will be won or lost on the strength of the economy, not on updated transfer rules for collegiate athletes.

I also happen to believe Trump genuinely cares about this issue. It's no coincidence that he held a meeting with some of the most prestigious voices in college football during the last week of March ahead of signing this EO in early April.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
5364 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:49 am to
Again, the only fix for this that will survive judicial scrutiny under the laws of the US that govern businesses and intrastate and interstate commerce will be negotiated and contractual.

I am 100% for reining in the Wild West portal. But I understand that the money is not going away and that the days of players being viewed as gladiators existing only for the fans’ entertainment and coaches being absolute dictators and treating players like Sgt. Hartman from Full Metal Jacket is never coming back.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5204 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The NCAA and or the schools themselves


In case you haven't been paying attention the entire reason college sports is a cluster is because state legislature and numerous state and federal courts have basically been telling the NCAA they CANT make their own rules.

The system, flawed as it was, worked fine, for a long time.

All this federal action isn't just out of the blue, it's a reaction to previous government intervention.

The hypocrisy of being for/against certain actions depending on party is definitely real but you're the one strongly on the wrong side of that this time.

Every single power conference every single major coach and AD has come out in favor of this. They still want legislation because that is far more stable than executive orders. The executive order is sound and a good idea but a temporary band-aid until legislation can get passed which is obviously a nightmare to do
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61014 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Like Democratic Presidents have always done?


I would agree the Democrats/ left in general tend to be worse of failing to grasp that massive expansion of Federal government power will one day be used by the other party, a lesson crystal clear with this President, The question is should we oppose overreach as a matter of principle or do you just oppose it when it’s the other side because that’s a really terrible way to govern.

quote:

If it's broad, and it is a restriction of general funds then it might stand up to a challenge.


This would be a disaster on many levels.

quote:

However, it's worth a fight


It seems to be the biggest problem is some, most older men, don’t like it. People not liking the transfer portal or NIL doesn’t make them a problem per se. Someone need to articulate the downsides, how it’s harmful and on the players or sport.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
5364 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:39 am to
The legislatures and courts are recognizing that there is nothing … N-O-T-H-I-N-G … different or special about college sports compared to any other business. The power conferences and the coaches of course want to see the status quo return because it’s in their best interests and fans just want their bread and circuses.

Again, the fix for this is a collective, contractual agreement with the athletes.

I will remind you that the Supreme Court can overturn legislation from Congress, and that their decision clearing the way for where we are now was 9-0 with strong signals that they are ready to go farther toward the athletes’ side.
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
1247 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 11:03 am to
Yeah there’s no way this would stand up in any court bc of the leverage you’d be giving colleges to restrict pay.

For example, take Nick Marsh.

2024- Michigan State
2025- Michigan State
2026- Indiana

Indiana paid Marsh a lot of $$$$ to transfer to IU for 2026. But if that rule of “only 1 time no sit out transfer” was in place, what would stop Indiana from deciding in 2027 to pay him nothing or drastically less? Knowing he couldn’t find another job without sitting out the whole year.

Once you pay the players the cat is out of the bag. Unlimited transfers is just the byproduct of it. It can’t be reversed without also eliminating all Rev Share/NIL
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
5364 posts
Posted on 4/4/26 at 11:15 am to
Once this became a zillion dollar business, where we are at today became inevitable.

Of course there are people who will come on this board and argue with a straight face that the people who are putting their asses on the line to entertain them should be content to play for tuition, books, room and board and the glory and honor of a school and its colors.

I can tell you, having talked to athletes 40 years ago, things haven’t changed that much, they’d have been all over the portal and NIL if they could have and they especially only tolerated their coaches’ s**t and having to deal with the fans because they had to, they played for themselves even back then.
This post was edited on 4/4/26 at 11:16 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram