- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:25 pm to popeyeaux
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:25 pm to popeyeaux
It is up for interpretation, there is no right answer. It depends what each indivual considers a football move. I think extending the ball with possession for the goal line is a football move. So I say catch by the rulebook
0
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to BayouBengals03
PEaria is a POS who wasn't good enough to be an actual ref anymore. he doesn't know how to explain the rules. What a POS> I hope he has a flat tire on the way home
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to shel311
Either way, it doesn't matter. The rule book clearly states that a player must maintain possession all the way through. It doesn't matter.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to shel311
the "dive" is absolutely up for debate, and the ball was jostled loose during his first step
The steps are somewhat irrelevant, though. He was going to the ground with possession, and he had to maintain it all the way through.
When he didn't do that, he didn't complete the catch.
The steps are somewhat irrelevant, though. He was going to the ground with possession, and he had to maintain it all the way through.
When he didn't do that, he didn't complete the catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
The football move is when he tried to reach the ball into the end zone and score.
dez CLEARLY moves his upper body to stop falling and to allow him to propel his body towards the end zone, which he does
if the act was one "fall", then he would have fallen on his back or side and not on his stomach. that turn and reach = football move
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to DelU249
Wasn't a catch. I knew it when the play happened and I knew it would be revered.
And I was HOPING it would be a catch!!!
And I was HOPING it would be a catch!!!
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to Tigerstudent08
The act of diving for the endzone is in fact a football move. The play Should have stood based on it being called complete on the field. The official called it complete because he considered that a football move. Its certainly disputable and not conclusive that the dive was controlled enough to be considered a football move therefore whatever was ruled on the field should stand.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm to WestCoastAg
Wow, a lot of you obviously do not know the rules. It was not a catch. He has to maintain control/possession when going to the ground and he did not. It has nothing to do with how many steps he took or if he made a football move. Jesus. 
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to ButchItUp
quote:No, it says football move completes the catch as well. That is up to everyone's interpretation
Either way, it doesn't matter. The rule book clearly states that a player must maintain possession all the way through. It doesn't matter.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to OneMoreTime
and that angle opens up the issue of whether the ball even hit the ground or not
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
PEaria is a POS who wasn't good enough to be an actual ref anymore. he doesn't know how to explain the rules. What a POS> I hope he has a flat tire on the way home
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to OneMoreTime
Falling the whole time
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to OneMoreTime
just saw a catch
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to DelU249
Was it a catch? Yes
However, it was not a catch according to a very poor NFL rule introduced about six years ago. The problem is that the rule was misapplied in this case.
However, it was not a catch according to a very poor NFL rule introduced about six years ago. The problem is that the rule was misapplied in this case.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to ButchItUp
quote:You're saying it doesn't matter if he completed the act of a catch? Not sure what you're saying at all here.
Either way, it doesn't matter. The rule book clearly states that a player must maintain possession all the way through. It doesn't matter.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to shel311
quote:
quote:
he didn't get 3 steps.
He definitely took 3 steps after th the catch, then a
dive.
He was falling and stretched out. Good call
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to ButchItUp
quote:
The rule book clearly states that a player must maintain possession all the way through. It doesn't matter.
only if the catch hasn't been completed
once it's completed, that section does not apply
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to lsupride87
He didn't make a football move. He fell to the ground.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to NawlinsTiger9
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:31 pm
Page 9 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News